John Mills (is he "anti-business"?) writes:
Despite the government’s rhetoric to the contrary, the UK
economy is in trouble. Government debt is increasing at about 3 per cent of GDP
per annum.
By 2020, at this rate, gross government debt as a percentage of GDP
will be well over 100 per cent, with no sign of any let-up in sight.
To
have a hope of getting government finances under control, as a starting point,
we need giant corporations to pay the right amount of tax.
Last
week we discovered that, far from paying their fair share, Google had cut a
deal with the government which saw it pay just £130m in back taxes covering
trading in the UK since 2005, amounting to a tax rate of no more than 3 per
cent.
Meanwhile,
Google’s global company profits were up 19 per cent in 2014, standing
at $66bn for the year – with, reportedly, 9 per cent of this figure
coming from UK sales.
To
add insult to injury, it now transpires that the UK deal is nowhere near as
good as the ones cut by the French and Italian governments, even though Google
makes substantially less profit in both of these countries.
Google
appears to have argued successfully that its three separate rented offices in
London, with more than 1,000 desks, a gym and a cinema, are just temporary
branch offices and that its main ‘permanent establishment’ HQ is in Dublin.
Of
course, this inability to commit to the UK is nothing to do with Ireland’s
famously low corporation tax rates.
In fact, Google have a long track record of
promising that they will move their European HQ to a purpose-built complex in
Central London.
But
they have spent the last year hiring and then firing architects – one design
with a swimming pool on the roof was, allegedly, deemed ‘boring’, and the
architect let go.
Now
that a tax deal has been cut, perhaps we’ll see how serious they really are
about moving ‘permanently’ to the UK – or perhaps they’ll just continue their
search for an interesting architect.
But then, when you’re a business with
reportedly $72bn in cash sitting in the bank, you can afford to be choosy.
But
Google is not alone.
A large number of global corporations with big footprints
in the UK pay their tax elsewhere – or, rather, try very hard to pay no tax
anywhere. They have armies of tax consultants who spend all their time finding
and exploiting loopholes.
For
example, Netflix paid absolutely no UK corporation tax in 2014 despite being
estimated to have around 4.5m subscribers here. It did pay tax in Luxembourg,
however, but at the rate equivalent to 5 per cent.
And
it’s not just global tech companies that don’t pay much, if any, corporate tax.
According to Jon Ungoed-Thomas writing in the Sunday Times, Lloyds Banking Group said it
paid no corporation tax in 2014 after offsetting losses in previous years
against a profit of £1.76bn.
British
American Tobacco (BAT) made global profits of £4.55bn in 2014 and paid £1.4bn
in corporation tax around the world, but not a penny in Britain.
Similarly,
Vodafone made £1.97bn of profits in the year to March 31, 2015 but confirmed
this weekend that it paid no UK corporation tax in 2014/15.
In
fact, of the 10 top companies on the London Stock Exchange, six paid no UK
corporation tax in the period covered by their latest annual accounts — 2014 or
2014/15.
This
is a national disgrace. How can the government let this happen?
Most
businesses pay the full amount of tax in the UK because they don’t cut deals
with ministers and civil servants to get out of paying what they need to
contribute to keeping the UK a civilised place, let alone avoiding making a
reasonable contribution to the cost of educating their staff and failing to
provide funding to the government to help to provide the infrastructure and the
stable environment on which their operations depend.
And
individual taxpayers – most of them employees – have no choice as to the amount
of tax they pay. Many are struggling to keep their heads above water.
It’s not
good enough to imply that we must cut deals with these giant corporations
because we need them more than they need us.
Globalisation
is not going to suddenly start reversing. Quite the opposite.
And we need to
ensure these giant global corporations pay their fair share.
Scrapping
the confidentiality of tax returns for large global corporations is something
we could do tomorrow.
And if, as many people have suggested, the best way to
encourage proper compliance is to name and shame, then this is something we
should do.
But
the underlying problem is that this government cosies up to global business. It
doesn’t put the British working people first – instead, it puts the interest of
big business at the very top of their list of priorities.
And
until we can tackle this inherent bias, this star-struck attitude to corporate
money and the people that make it, no amount of small fixes will solve the tax
inequality in our system today.
No comments:
Post a Comment