Monday, 18 May 2026

Than At Any Point

There was no recession on the day of the 2010 Election, as there had been none for years when the polls opened in 1997. Likewise, no one down the Dog and Duck gives a dog or duck about your growth figures or your IMF forecasts. They do not believe you, and they never will.

Nor are they the only ones. According to Wes Streeting, whom you have always wanted to be Prime Minister eventually, Brexit, which you have always opposed, has been "a catastrophic mistake" that has "left us less wealthy, less powerful and less in control than at any point before the Industrial Revolution". Yes, he really did say that. And he is planning to make a resignation statement to the House of Commons. So which is it? Is Britain going gangbusters under Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves? Or are we poorer than ever before?

And Everything As You See Me

Cork City Council is thinking of putting up, “a statue to the mosquito or midge that bit Oliver Cromwell during his siege of the city, later causing his death through ‘Cork fever’ (malaria); and that this statue shall be the ‘world’s smallest public statue’.” Cromwell lived for nine years after the Siege of Cork, but why let that spoil things?

Well may Rupert Lowe charge £2500 per annum for membership of his Cromwell Club. Anticipating the bourgeois capitalist revolutions of 1688, 1776 and 1789, the regime that executed Charles I also persecuted the Levellers and the Diggers for their appeals to “the Ancient Constitution” and to “time out of mind”. In 1661, Cromwell’s corpse was dug up, tried, convicted and hanged. Today, his statue appears to guard the entrance to Parliament. But as Alex Nunns, the Labour Left’s preeminent present chronicler of itself, once said to me, “John Lilburne himself would pull down the statue of Cromwell, if he were not 350 years dead.”

The proposal to erect that statue nearly brought down the Liberal Government of the day. It went up only because the Liberal Unionists decided that making a point against the Irish Nationalists was even more important than making a pro-Tory one. So they voted for it against the ferocious opposition both of the Irish Nationalists and of their own Tory allies. It is pointedly not inside the Palace of Westminster, and not a penny of public money was spent on putting it up even where it is. In fact, it exists only because of a donation by the Liberal former Prime Minister, Lord Roseberry. He then gave an address at its unveiling. But almost no one knew that that was why he was the speaker. His donation had had to be made anonymously.

Places Like Ours?

“Politics isn’t working for places like ours,” says Andy Burnham of the place where he has been Mayor for the last nine years. Mayor of Greater Manchester. One of the most powerful subnational positions in Europe. Speaking of Europe, Burnham would not seek to rejoin the EU, but he may as well, since he would stick to Rachel Reeves’s fiscal rules. I have just heard (“I didn’t like to call you during Corrie”) that Ed Miliband was reconsidering his endorsement of Burnham in return for the Chancellorship if the Chancellorship were going to mean that.

Yields have been going up the world over, so that was never anything to do with Burnham. Now, though, what is? Well, there is always devolution. In the areas that Burnham has in mind, how many councils does Reform UK have to take, or at the very least does Labour have to lose? Labour is tied with Reform for a distant second place at Holyrood, where it has not governed in 19 years, and it is in a very distant third place in the Senedd. Dawn Butler has rowed back on the suggestion that she might stand for Mayor of London, since the Greens are highly likely to take it, heaven help all concerned, and even more so without Sadiq Khan. There have been seven elections to the London Mayoralty, and Labour has only ever won four of them, three with Khan and the fourth with a man who, having already wiped the floor with Labour as an Independent, would have done so again.

And there is always Proportional Representation. But the arguments for that and the arguments for First Past the Post are both rubbish in their own terms, so the case for change has not been made, while at the same time the change itself would not be the end of the world, even if organisationally it might very well be the end of the Labour Party. Under the supposed Holy Grail that is the Single Transferable Vote, every Taoiseach has been the Leader either of Fianna Fáil or of Fine Gael. In any case, Burnham is surrounded by people who would want to put it to a referendum. The electoral system for directly elected Mayors has changed twice without a referendum. There was no referendum on the introduction of STV for local government in Scotland, which entertainingly led to a reduction in the number of Liberal Democrat councillors, nor was there a referendum on the drastic alteration of the arrangements for electing the Senedd. But Burnham’s associates would insist on one. Call it the Stopped Compass.

Holding out for something better, Angela Rayner turned down Health Secretary, so the opponents of assisted suicide have lost the position. James Murray is also a departure from Wes Streeting, whatever Streeting’s other faults, in that while Streeting was ambivalent, or inconsistent if you prefer, about gender identity, Murray is a true believer who now runs England’s NHS while unable to define a woman. And where does this preposterous idea come from, that Jeremy Corbyn would have the slightest desire to be back in the Labour Party? An interviewer should ask him. Like them or not, he has always given very straight answers. We former members of the Labour Party get everywhere. Lee Anderson, who was a Labour councillor into his fifties and well into the Corbyn Leadership, is now the Chairman of Reform UK. It is notable that he has been given that job while remaining Chief Whip. It is, though, wholly unremarkable that he should have it while having been Deputy Chairman of the Conservative Party under Rishi Sunak. Not Boris Johnson. Not Liz Truss. Rishi Sunak. Think on.

Account Ability

Anna Gross writes:

Nigel Farage’s claim that he paid for a £1.4mn house with his fee from a reality TV show has been challenged by corporate accounts that appear to show that the income remained on his company’s balance sheet after the property purchase.

Farage bought a £1.4mn house in Surrey on May 10 2024, just weeks after receiving £5mn from crypto billionaire Christopher Harborne, but did not register the gift in his MPs’ register of interests after taking office the following month.

On Thursday, the parliamentary standards commissioner announced he had launched an investigation into the Reform UK leader’s failure to declare the gift, which Farage has said was to pay for his security.

Farage’s spokesperson told the BBC on Friday that he had paid for the Surrey property with his fee for participating in I’m a Celebrity . . . Get Me Out of Here! in late 2023, which was roughly £1.5mn before tax, and that he had not used the money given by Harborne.

The Reform leader told the FT last year that his earnings from the reality show were paid to his personal media company Thorn in the Side Ltd.

Accounts for the company show its cash position increased from £300,000 on May 31 2023 to £1.7mn on May 31 2024, and suggest that no dividend was paid out in the period.

Property records show that Farage, not Thorn in the Side, bought the Surrey home and that there is no mortgage on the property. Nimesh Shah, a tax expert at accountancy firm Blick Rothenberg, reviewed the company accounts for the FT and said that they suggested money from Farage’s reality TV show appearance was not used to purchase the house.

He said Reform’s claim that the house was purchased using money from the reality TV appearance fee “needs to be clarified because the company’s accounts are not consistent with their statement”.

If Farage is found to have breached parliamentary rules by failing to declare a gift, he could be suspended from the House of Commons and a by-election could be triggered in his constituency.

Responding to a question about the source of the funds for Farage’s house purchase, Reform said: “Nigel has multiple sources of income, as you can see from his parliamentary register.”

The apparent inconsistency in Reform’s explanation adds to questions about Farage’s transparency over the purpose of the £5mn gift, which Harborne gave to him about two months before Farage announced that he would stand to be MP for Clacton at the 2024 general election.

Farage has repeatedly said that Harborne gave him the money to pay for his security, saying earlier this month that “Christopher is an ardent supporter who is deeply concerned for my safety.”

But on Thursday he told The Sun that the money was a “reward for campaigning for Brexit for 27 years”.

MPs are obliged to report financial benefits they receive in the 12 months before being elected. Farage was elected in July 2024 and did not record the gift in his parliamentary register of interests.

There is an exemption in the parliamentary rules for strictly personal gifts, “which could not reasonably be thought by others to be related to membership of the House or to the Member’s parliamentary or political activities”.

Harborne, who has lived in Thailand for the past two decades, donated £12mn to Reform last year, making him one of the biggest donors in British political history.

According to Farage’s register of interests, the Reform leader made about £1mn on top of his MP salary in his first year in office, including from his role presenting on GB News, videos for the Cameo platform, speaking engagements and his ambassador role for Gold Bullion.

Another England


It was just after Midday at the start of Tommy Robinson’s Unite the Kingdom rally and a giant Carl Benjamin was holding forth in front of the Cenotaph. “Can you feeeeeel the winds of change blowing,” he crooned on a massive flat screen TV, trying to warm up the crowd for an afternoon of Katie Hopkins, Ant Middleton and a man who played the cello while covered in rashers of bacon.

Benjamin was a vastly different entity in the flesh compared to the trailblazing polemicist online. He had the seedy attire and haunted charisma of a gigging magician who carried the shame of one too many children’s birthday parties. Benjamin’s lacklustre overture set the tone for the afternoon’s official proceedings. A carnival of pride for the forgotten — one that sought to accommodate everyone from Elon Musk to the families of those who had been raped by hotel migrants, ended up coming across as incoherent and hammy.

During the Queen’s funeral, it was noted that this would be the last outing for Imperial London and all its pomp. Central London on a weekend now feels like a city that only really comes alive as a competing arena for protest and grievances. “Tommy Robinson is having one of his marches,” said one father to his child outside Charing Cross Station, as if this were now a fixture in league with the Changing of the Guard. Gormless statues of Nelson Mandela and Gandhi in Parliament Square were commandeered with St George’s flags and pensioners from Southend, Dagenham and Wigan picnicking and listening to Rikki Doolan, Robinson’s pastor dressed in a Union Jack three-piece as he belted his aspiring chart topper God’s Kingdom.

The smell of marijuana and lager was mixed with one of those fresh Spring mornings that made the world feel young and anything possible. One effete lady from Faversham, a retired social worker who resembled the late Victoria Wood, was nattering away to a pair of police officers about the Kalergi Plan, the conspiracy to depopulate the West’s white population. “Right, well I haven’t heard of that one” said the officer trying to be generous. Spanish schoolchildren were curiously milling about with a vanguard of motability scooters at the top of Whitehall, taking photos of their home made placards that read: Keir Starmer is a wanker.

Seen through the eyes of tourists and global onlookers, such scenes seem to have seamlessly blended into the “brilliant bonkers Britain” package. This mix of laboured quirkiness and iconic symbols has finally gone fittingly berserk: Paddington Bear, Morris Dancers, and now Unite the Kingdom with its processional danse macabre of dogs in Union Jack bunting and reformed football hooligans. Robinson lifers on their sixth cans were subdued by all the Christianity. One marcher resentfully described it as noticeably more “middle class and established” than September’s inaugural protest, as if this were some undiscovered festival that had been ruined now that word had got around.

One man, a construction manager in his forties from London, was one of the curious newcomers. He was hoping the lineup would include his YouTube favourites: Edward Dutton (aka “The Jolly Heretic”) and the Lotus Eaters who he reeled off like a lineup at a festival. “You see, people are more into their politics these days than their music, so these will end up becoming the new Glastonbury” he said with an air of resignation.

The Glastonbury analogy worked on many levels. Both events attract a certain demographic from a certain part of the country, who though not exactly united in their taste, are free to pursue their interests in a broadly sympathetic setting. Just as Elbow and new age crusties can co-exist in the fields of Worthy Farm, so too at the Unite the Kingdom can a belief in the restoration of the Shah of Iran and the hero worship of Stephen Yaxley-Lennon.

Britain’s media has yet to really catch up with this novel coming together, still relying on exhausted Brexit era-hermeneutics of the “somewheres” and “left behinds” to prop up interminable studio debates about whether the protestors are “far right” But this is less a political rally, more a coming together of all the burgeoning YouTube cults, community entrepreneurs and paranoid and conspiratorial civic networks that now thrive in the hinterlands of England. This is a subculture well articulated in a recent piece by Jonny Ball on Liverpool’s “Cosmic Scousers”. But they can be found across the country wherever there are steadily accumulating folk traumas of grooming gangs, migrant misdemeanours, murky HMOs and an increasingly surreal breakdown and malaise.

Contrary to a country wrongly bemoaned as “atomised”, those who have filled this vacuum represent a thriving and self-sufficient world virtually unknown to the public intellectuals who waffle away at conferences on how to reestablish a meaningful sense of top-down social cohesion. Another England, set well on course for the 21st century, is taking shape through this highly localised anti-establishment aesthetic of gaudy patriotism, community vigilantism and God-tinged spiritualism. These are anxieties unlikely to be assuaged by Westminster foibles like “Pride in Place” and even Reform’s pledge to teach a more “patriotic curriculum”. Labour’s Mike Tapp was recently lampooned for an AI video picturing him walking his dog amidst an AI generated blizzard of spitfires on the cliffs of Dover. But he was at least attempting to work inside the form.

Something barmier and more metaphysical has awakened in the English psyche. You could watch this tension play out as journalists tried to interview its denizens. DJ Mike, a man who had turned his Brompton bike into a portable karaoke machine was singing a doozy about the “enemy within”. DJ Bob was trying to politely imply he was too eccentric and mentally unwell to parley with a vox popping YouTuber about whether woke had gone too far. He was too preoccupied with a grander battle unfolding between the forces of Good and Evil.

A novel study in what this New England does to the soul was Brian, a thirty year old post-graduate student from Suzhou who had turned up with all the latest Restore merchandise: a tasteful chrome water bottle and a navy hat that read: Make Britain Great Again. Just a year of living in Wembley had driven him to the streets in protests. Modelling the rhetorical turn of his idol Rupert Lowe, he was upset to discover the England he had grown up watching in China — of James Bond and Paddington Bear — did not really exist.

By the late afternoon, even Robinson seemed unable to contain these multitudes. Yaxley Lennon, who in his born again reinvention, has taken on the tedious emoting of a theatrical old ham. It’s now possible to imagine a Stephen Frears or even a Ken Loach, lurking off stage, directing him in some dirge about a reformed far-right football hooligan. There was plenty of ripe material on stage: the parents of Rhiannon White, the hotel worker who was stabbed to death with a screwdriver by a Sudanese migrant gave a speech that drew tears.

By late afternoon an apocalyptic exodus of crowds was taking place across London. Helicopters were lurking in the sky and there was a roving, unsatisfied mood that recalled the ending of Nathanael West’s The Day of The Locust. The finale is a Hollywood premiere sunk by a vengeful crowd that comes to realise they have been played along. “Their boredom became more and more terrible,” wrote West, “If only a plane would crash once in a while (like in the newspapers and movies)… But the planes never crash.” The rumoured Civil War, the 2nd coming of Christ might not come after all. And all they will be left with is the England that now exists beyond Unite the Kingdom.

As Jonny Ball does indeed write:

“The magic of Liverpool is that it isn’t England,” the leading Left-wing campaigner Margaret Simey said in the late Nineties. She was expressing a mood that had become pervasive in the city by that time. Liverpool has long seen itself as exceptional, set apart from the country proper: a bolshie, rebel city, so the legend goes, defined by its Labour politics, its working-class culture, its port and Celtic air. An only semi-ironic separatist ethos still shapes Scouse identity today. It’s the reason why crowds at Anfield stadium chant “Scouse not English” and “Fuck the Tories” (the Anglo party par excellence), while at Wembley Liverpudlian hordes boo when they hear “God Save the King”. The militant city, by its own mythology, bravely fought the “managed decline” of Margaret Thatcher while the rest of the industrial North swallowed her iatrogenic medicine whole.

As with any founding myth, a kernel of truth lies within the layers of hyperbole and self-aggrandisement. But it is hard to square Liverpool’s self-referential and pre-supposed Leftism with some of the results from this week’s local elections in neighbouring boroughs within Liverpool City Region (the city of Liverpool proper doesn’t go to the polls until next May). In Halton, just a stone’s throw away from Liverpool John Lennon Airport and Halewood car factories that were once the sites of legendary strikes, Reform has just swept the board. To the north, Sefton council has swayed towards Nigel Farage’s barmy army, reducing Labour’s once-mammoth majority, with Reform taking five seats and missing out on many more by a whisker. Three years ago, this Merseyside enclave, the birthplace of Jamie Carragher, was home to 51 Labour councillors. Today, the streets that Carragher – a Labour donor – once played football in as a boy are represented by a Holocaust-denying Reform councillor. Then there’s Knowsley, which in 2023 experienced some of the first violent anti-migrant hotel riots in England. This week, the Labour seats that were up for grabs were decimated, with Independents and Reform benefiting from the Left’s collapse.

Liverpool, then, the quintessential “Red City”, currently stands within a soft, mushy doughnut of turquoise populism. Today’s results could well portend those of Liverpool City Council next May: Labour activists and councillors tell me that their once-solid wards in the north of the city are being dragged rightwards.

Merseyside’s political culture is clearly in a state of flux. And this is in no small part down to the emergence of a new, peculiarly Liverpudlian subculture: the Cosmic Scallies. “Scally” for their roots in Scouse working-class street culture, and “Cosmic” for their predilection for bizarre, New Age-coded, anti-systemic worldviews and lifestyles. These track-suited eccentrics don’t conform to the stereotype of the Leftist Scouser, backing Labour come what may. But they’re certainly not Tories either. Rather, the Cosmic Scallies are Liverpool’s own manifestation of the very online reactionary Right.

This is a broad church without a single, well-defined school of thought — a diffuse medley of influencers and their followers. But, generally speaking, the Cosmic Scally combines a devotion to deranged conspiracy theory, alternative medicine, gym culture, self-help, and men’s mental health discourse, with a side-helping of anti-migrant hostility and “common sense” anti-wokism. Some advocate for the use of psychedelics. Others swear by meditation. Still more are ex-addicts celebrating their sobriety on socials. And their rise, in the streets and online, is part of what’s driving a slow divorce between Liverpool and its Labour traditions.

The Cosmic Scallies were born out of the city’s distinctively proletarian customs. Think not of what tabloid Britain might have called the “chav” — an archetype that was rarely found in Liverpool — but of young(ish) lads in head-to-toe sportswear, Under Armour tracksuits and Nike Air Max trainers. In many cases, the short back-and-sides of yesteryear have been replaced by the “ketwig” — a huge mop of curly, unkempt locks, so-named because of many of its wearers’ enthusiasm for ketamine. Many of these Scouse denizens will be footsoldiers of the Cosmic Scally multiverse.

A typical Cosmic Scally is the lad in North Face with a joint behind his ear who insists on regaling you with muddled tales of Masonic control, chemtrails, corrupt police and the Great Replacement theory at a pub on North Liverpool’s Country Road. Or the taxi driver I met not long ago who turned down the TalkSport phone-in to tell me that the Labour Party was a thinly disguised front for paedophile elites intent on “importing the Third World”, before warning me not to “pump shit” into my body via vaccination.

Their dubious intellectual gurus can mostly be found on social media, where Cosmic Scally influencers push a bewildering range of insidious political messages. Rescuing children from unnamed malcontents is a common theme. After the Southport murders in 2024, it was a “Save Our Kids” protest promoted by the Cosmic Scally cyberspace network that descended into a riot that spread across the country. Other political themes include Stop the Boats, Islam, and migration.

One of the most well known of the bunch is the former Olympic boxer Anthony Fowler, who has built a solid fanbase of more than 200,000 followers selling CBD oil alongside Kerry Katona and Katie Price. He extols the benefits of staring at the sun to avoid sunburn and claims he cured his infant daughter’s cancer with his own CBD oil and an organic diet. Peppering his endless face-to-camera sales pitches are nods to stories of migrants attacking children: “Dont [sic] touch my little sister she’s 12,” he posted, after footage emerged of a Scottish girl brandishing knives, apparently to protect her sister from a migrant attack. “If her parents or legal team can be contacted I am happy to help cover any legal fees,” Fowler said. He implores followers to “Protects [sic] your children”. “If your daughters in the bathroom you see who’s in there [sic],” he once posted, alongside an AI image of a sturdy MAGA man blocking a trans activist from a toilet.

Then there’s the former crystal-meth addict, Muay Thai fighter and stuntman Billy Moore, who makes a tidy living documenting “raise the flag” street protests, talking to the residents of homeless encampments and making fun of the people on Liverpool’s Antifa demos. Last month, he posted footage of a man confronting him and calling him a “little Rightwing piece of filth, taking advantage of homeless left, right and centre”. Moore said that his accuser was “a Leftwing bigot” who “voted the Green Party, loves LGBT stuff” and was “probably gay”. His videos regularly garner several hundred thousand views — the stuff of dreams for any beleaguered local Labour politician.

The unofficial King of the Cosmic Scallies is perhaps Sine Missione, an elusive, Banksy-style local graffiti artist. He played a central role in anti-lockdown protests, pushing QAnon, flat-Earth theories and “sacred geometry” psychedelia on his socials. He has since been overtaken by newer, self-styled gurus and accounts, and has deleted his socials. But his message lives on.

When the digital crosses into the real, it can take strange forms. In a Liverpool park, Cosmic Scally-coded “We Stand for Freedom” protests push every slogan and conspiracy under the sun: from “Stop the Boats” to dire warnings of man-made weather, mind-control techniques, and government planes spraying unknowing citizens from grey skies overhead.

The local poet and author PJ Smith (aka Roy) lamented the rise of the Cosmic Scallies in his hip-hop track, “Loss is not infinite”, listing, in doleful resignation, some of the core features of the subculture: “5G conspiracy scalls/ Ayahuasca nuts in Mammut kecks…/ Meditation meatheads/ Anti-vaccine stoners.”

Antonio Gramsci might have described these influencers as the “organic intellectuals” of the Cosmic Scally movement. Not intellectuals in the sense of their academic credentials, of course, but in their bottom-up articulation of a “new social type”, giving a “homogeneity”, a kind of collective consciousness and projected voice to the Cosmic Scally strata. Theirs is a diffuse and hybrid identity, combining the solidly plebeian traditions of the modern Scouser with an incredulity towards any-and-all established authority and an unusual blend of back-to-nature hippydom, individual self-empowerment and blood-and-soil nationalism.

The Cosmic Scally influencer is what Alan Finlayson, a Professor of Political & Social Theory at the University of East Anglia and researcher into the digital Right, calls “a new kind of ideological entrepreneur”. No longer constrained by the “old institutions” that once defined the city’s politics — political parties, newspapers, broadcasters, the Church, the trade unions, working men’s clubs — these online influencers act as “independent operators producing new ways of thinking about the world”, creating novel, unconventional political thought.

Social media, the great leveller, has been the driving force behind this. No longer do the gatekeepers of traditional broadcasting keep the Overton window narrow. Where once the realms of political debate were kept focused and respectable, today all sorts of ideas and symbols compete for likes and subscribers in the infinite nexus of “content”. The Cosmic Scallies are a product of the evolution from top-down, one-to-many media communications to a schizophrenic, many-to-many mesh of ideas, poses and products.

This isn’t a self-conscious political tribe: there is no coherent ideology, leader, or formal organisation. There’s no Tommy Robinson-type at the top giving orders, nor are there ageing National Front or BNP hard men talking about white supremacy over warm beer in flat-roof pubs. Instead, the Cosmic Scallies constitute what the Marxist cultural critic Raymond Williams referred to as a “structure of feeling”: an ephemeral collective imaginary, a shared vibe or atmosphere.

But while the movement may be amorphous, it is influencing the reconstitution of the politics of Liverpool. While voting for the Conservatives is still anathema to most Scousers, the Reform brand is untainted enough to satisfy the very real anti-establishment culture of the city’s popular classes, particularly in the poorer North End.

“We’re going to get torn apart in the locals next year,” a door-knocking Labour activist tells me over text. “We’re fucked. Bricking it.” Every ward in Liverpool goes to the polls in May 2027. In traditionally solid Labour areas, where “Tory” is used as an insult spat out by contorted faces, many voters are likely to join the Faragist insurgency, just as some of their neighbours have in Knowsley, Sefton and Halton. The demographic here, the miserable Labourite tells me, includes a lot of “very young, semi-drug dealing, or make-up artist-y, Cosmic Scousery renters”. Their fuck-off Scouse animus that once found expression through the labour movement and militant trade unionism could now be set to banish Labour entirely: “The issue will be Reform, or independents,” the campaigner tells me. After several seats in nearby Knowsley fell to Reform, including the home ward of the Corbynite Labour MP Ian Byrne, the activist texts again: “I never thought it would be this bad.”

Part of the problem, they tell me, is that the contemporary Labour Party has alienated so many on Merseyside. Liverpool’s brand of Leftism was once solidly workerist, rooted in industrial struggles and class warfare. Now, the Cosmic Scallies are uniting in opposition to what the US Right have called “gay race communism” — a New Left degradation of the labour movement tradition, dominated by studenty, middle-class cohorts and rooted in politically-correct discourses and the pained language of the perma-activist class. If this is what the modern Left is, says the weary door-knocker, then it’s driving a wedge between itself and many Scousers.

Then there’s the fact that nobody in Liverpool is listening to Labour HQ’s increasingly desperate comms. Labour politicians have no idea how to adapt to a world of short-form vertical video in which the currency is outrage and eyeballs-at-all-costs extremity. They’re still giving speeches and hoping to be featured on the Today programme, while the old bastions on the Mersey are being dragged towards an outfit that does understand the new times — perhaps aided by the mad, anti-systemic obsessions of the Cosmic Scally ecosystem. Finlayson’s “ideological entrepreneurs” have filled the void left by the collapse of Christianity, socialism, and syndicalism, channeling the combative spirit of the city towards paranoiac fantasy and Right-wing populists.

Further fuelling Liverpool’s collective disenchantment are the usual culprits of economic decline and rapid demographic change. Merseyside has never truly recovered from the containerisation of global shipping, which mechanised the loading and unloading of merchant ships, obviating the need for a city full of raucous dock-labourers. That occurred in tandem with the rapid collapse of the commercial trade routes of the British Empire, as well as with the painful move from goods-producing heavy manufacturing to a local hodgepodge of public service behemoths, hospitality, tourism and the culture industry. Add to the mix an inward flux of mainly poor migrants requiring housing, jobs and services, and you have a recipe for political convulsions.

This sense of political despair was accelerated by the pandemic, when locked-down Liverpudlians found themselves travelling deep into online rabbit holes. Rumour, half-truth, and hearsay proliferated as the city’s common culture gave way to the addictions, neuroses, and alienated hyper-individualism of the tailored feed. Liverpool emerged from the crisis with an economy defined by uncertainty and a postmodern epistemological model to mirror it: nothing works, trust no-one, anything is possible. It was the ideal breeding ground for would-be gurus, mini-Caesars and quasi-political entrepreneurs on the make — boom time for the Cosmic Scallies.

During the anti-migrant riots in Liverpool in 2024, a library was burnt down only a few miles from the gleaming city centre waterfront. Minority-owned businesses were attacked. The severity of the disturbances here surprised some — though none of it shocked those who had glimpsed the new Cosmic Scally phenomenon percolating through cyberspace.

The result of all this is a city with a very different complexion to the one it had not long ago — a city that imagines itself as a Labour citadel, but in fact looks rather different. No doubt, Liverpool is still a bastion of anti-Toryism. You’ll still find MMA fighters and sportsmen here indulging in popular scorn against established conservatism. That kind of default anti-Tory politics is as much a marker of local identity as the accent — the only English dialect that is strengthening rather than being subject to slow homogenisation into “estuary English”. But anti-Toryism won’t stop the populist Right. Reform seems to be emerging as the vehicle of choice for those Liverpolitans who swim in the broad waters of counter-cultural conspiracy and nativism.

This is no aberration. Set aside the myth of Scouse exceptionalism for a minute — that familiar story of class struggle, with Scousers as the plucky subalterns and everyone else the effete bourgeois — and you’ll see that Reform’s insurgency is fully compatible with Liverpool’s history and character. For while its recent civic story is replete with political and industrial militancy, Liverpool was never really a socialist or progressive urban area; that was always a myth. Right up until the Seventies, when religious sectarianism was alive and well, a local “Protestant party” fought against Irish immigration and apparent papal influence, with an effective Tory operation keeping Labour out of power for decades while other Northern cities became Left-wing heartlands. For every famous historical Liverpool strike or uprising, there’s a local race riot or an Orange Lodge firebrand successfully mobilising working-class Protestants against their Catholic neighbours. We may not like to admit it, but the Left-aligned “Rebel City” origin story is a recent invention.

In fact, John Belchem, a local historian and specialist in so-called “Liverpool exceptionalism”, tells me that many of the wards flirting with Reform today would have had a strong Protestant Party presence in the mid-20th century. There is, then, nothing new about Right-wing populism here. Indeed, the plague-on-all-your-houses symbolism of a populist protest vote sits well with Liverpool’s innate us-against-the-world mentality.

The Cosmic Scally is not, then, an imposter bringing alien politics into a Leftist heartland; on the contrary, he is a product of Scouse culture. He is as much an outgrowth of Liverpool’s supposed exceptionalism as the striking docker, the loud Scouse separatist, or the footballer decrying Thatcherism more than 30 years after her downfall. There’s a spirit of communitarian togetherness in Liverpool that gives the city an unusual sense of cohesion for a large urban area. But that same spirit also creates a punishing environment for those who get “too big for their boots”. Labour may have become too establishment, too arrogant, too complacent, too middle class, too metropolitan to fit in with that all-in-it-together plebeian Scouse pneuma. The Cosmic Scally is merely the strange, Scouse reification of national trends. Perhaps “the magic of Liverpool”, is that it is England, after all.

Sunday, 17 May 2026

Beyond Satire

The Official Monster Raving Loony Party has expressed its intention to contest the Makerfield by-election.

It should do so on a platform of keeping Sir Keir Starmer as Prime Minister, since that will not be the policy of any other candidate.

Then again, as the late Screaming Lord Sutch was fond of pointing out, he had been the first to suggest passports for pets, and those had eventually come to pass.

The Risk of Prejudice


Yvette Cooper wrote a newspaper column about Palestine Action despite prosecutors warning it could prejudice criminal proceedings against six activists from the group, it can be revealed.

The then-home secretary wrote the column justifying Palestine Action’s proscription even though the Crown Prosecution Service advised it might unfairly impact a trial concerning a 2024 break-in at an Israeli arms manufacturer’s factory.

After a retrial, four of the defendants were convicted last week in relation to the raid on the Elbit Systems UK site near Bristol. It can now be reported that defence lawyers sought to halt the proceedings for alleged abuse of process, claiming Cooper’s column for The Observer was “an egregious example of contemptuous reporting which directly interferes with the court process”.

The article, on 17 August, said that charges against Palestine Action activists included a “terrorism connection” and also referred to violence, intimidation and “disturbing information” about future attacks.

In written submissions arguing that a fair trial would be impossible, the defence lawyers said the article was “dripping in innuendo. In one breath, she is saying that many important details cannot yet be publicly reported; in another, she is reporting some of those very details herself”.

In a pre-trial ruling last November, Mr Justice Johnson said: “It is to be taken that the home secretary was specifically advised that going ahead with the article might prejudice these proceedings, and that she went ahead anyway … The CPS made representations to the home secretary about the risk of prejudice.

“It follows that the home secretary took the action that she did, and made the public statements that she did, in the knowledge that these proceedings were extant and that there might well be a question as to the impact of her conduct and her statements on these proceedings.”

However, Johnson dismissed the defence application for abuse of process, saying: “The decision to proscribe Palestine Action was highly controversial and required public justification. It is unsurprising that the government sought publicly to justify the decision that it had taken and that it relied, in general terms (without naming individuals), on Palestine Action’s activities, including the activities that have resulted in these proceedings.

“In doing so, the home secretary ran a risk of causing some prejudice to these proceedings, but that is different from deliberately flouting a reporting restriction order.”

In arguing that there were “false and irremediably prejudicial public statements made by the government when seeking to justify proscription”, defence lawyers cited other articles, including a report in the Times that Home Office officials claimed Iran could be funding Palestine Action. The Home Office later distanced itself from the claim, which Johnson described as “misleading”.

The defence team also claimed there had been an abuse of process in the charges against the defendants having a terrorist connection, claiming that the authorities wanted to ban Palestine Action and “they were aware that this could not be done without pursuing terrorism related charges”. The jury was not told during the trial about the terrorist connection allegation, which could have resulted in Charlotte Head, 29, Samuel Corner, 23, Leona Kamio, 30, and Fatema Rajwani, 21, receiving much harsher sentences on 12 June for criminal damage.

The third and final ground for abuse of process alleged “collusion between the government and the Israeli state, Elbit Systems and the pro-Israeli lobby regarding the proscription”, citing meetings and/or communications involving the named parties.

Johnson ruled there was no political interference in the charging decision and that the communications with groups outside government did not come close to establishing improper conduct.

A Home Office spokesperson said: “The judge concluded that the article did not prevent a fair trial taking place.

“The trial found four Palestine Action members guilty of criminal damage, and one was also found guilty of grievous bodily harm.”

Yvette Cooper is a wretch. On 23 June 2025, I was refused the tag that I had twice been promised in writing, the decision of a Home Office headed by that close ally of the former Labour Leadership of and then on Durham County Council, and I was released on 7 August only because the judge had specified that I must be, every effort having been made to keep me banged up at least until 7 November.

Having publicly called for hotels with human beings in them to be burned down, hotels and human beings that have since been attacked, Lucy Connolly was made to serve only 40 per cent of her sentence. Whereas after I had been due to be tagged, this guilty-pleading convict of non-violent, non-sexual, non-domestic, non-terrorist, and non-drugs-related offences watched that close ally of the former Labour Leadership of and then on Durham County Council tag wifebeaters, drug-dealers, and ringleaders of last year’s race riots. The Leadership of what little Labour Group remains on that authority has passed to the old NUM Left from the Strike; to the last of the five Councillors who were suspended from the Labour Party in 2008. But the mere electoral will of the people is irrelevant to these matters.

Nevertheless, let Cooper feel it when an acquitted or even a convicted Palestine Action defendant contested what she had already turned from her safe into her marginal seat. Will Reform UK, which is predicted to win it, field Connolly as its candidate? If not, why not? The law on local elections is tighter in this as in many other ways, but I had been sentenced to 12 months in 2021, and although I had to withdraw due to ill health, my nomination to contest the 2024 General Election was accepted without difficulty. Think on.