Sir
Cliff Richard was named by the Police in the media before he had been, as he
never was, arrested. Not charged. Arrested. Think on.
The
heavily orchestrated front page lynching of Sir Cliff not only made it
impossible for him to receive a fair trial, but was possibly the greatest act
of playground bullying that this country had ever seen. The cool kids in Fleet
Street, on the BBC and on Sky had waited a very long
time for that. Longer, in fact, than most of them could remember, or than well
over half of them had been alive.
There
is a strict canonical text of the history of this country's ubiquitous popular
music. To be honest, I generally prefer the canonical acts to the apocryphal
and pseudepigraphical ones. But that Authorised Version is incomplete to the
point of falsehood.
Look
at the charts in any week, month or year since pop music can reasonably be said
to have begun. The apostles and prophets of the given period are all there, of
course. But so are all sorts of other people, and not as novelty acts: they
took themselves entirely seriously, as did the fans who bought their records by
the bucket load.
Cliff
was originally so cool that when my father, as a curate in 1950s Leicester, was
deputed to take the church youth club to see him, they became so excited that
they smashed up the theatre and broke my father's arm, which was never right
again. In causing my father to be permanently injured, Cliff succeeded where Rommel, Mussolini and the Stern Gang had all failed.
But
for most of British pop's history, Cliff has been the towering, the
supreme, the definitive uncool act. Even stations dedicated to oldies have
written policies of not playing him, bizarrely describing the long-dead as more
enduring than a man who still performs live and who continues to record.
His
response is to be the single biggest-selling British solo artist ever, and the
third biggest-selling act in British chart history, beaten only by the Beatles
and by Elvis Presley. He has had more Top 20 hits than any other artist. Only
he and Elvis had hits in all six of the first decades of the UK Singles Chart.
Only he has had a Number One single in each of five consecutive decades.
In
this country, he has sold twice as many records as, say, David Bowie, and well
over twice as many as the Rolling Stones. Now, give me Bowie or the Stones any
day. But the numbers don't lie.
Moreover,
he is only three years older than Paul McCartney, he is only two years older
than Mick Jagger and Keith Richards, and he was born in the same year as John
Lennon. Yet he has been famous since well before any of them ever was. Let's
face it, we are talking about being seriously famous here. Seriously rich with
it, too. All as, and by being, something approaching an unperson to Everyone
Who Matters.
Look
how a Billy Graham Crusade was dragged into this long-predictable attempt at a
takedown. And look how that event, already too ghastly in itself, has managed
to surpass even that by being held in Sheffield.
No wonder that it was played out on
television. Anyone would assume that it were the script for a work of fiction.
One of those ones which are not as clever as they think they are, and which are
only about laughing at the common people.
If
Sir Cliff had been guilty, then he would have deserved whatever he got
from the courts. At least the same is deserved by Bill Wyman. He was 47 when he
repeatedly and flagrantly had sex with a girl who, at 13, was probably younger
than the alleged victim in this single instance.
Notice
how, while the man who had the effrontery to have a hit with Stairway to Heaven featuring
a wobble board is now in prison and ruined, Jimmy Page himself has never faced
any action whatever in relation to his 14-year-old girlfriend of yesteryear. Rolf
Harris has rightly been stripped of his CBE; Page was awarded his OBE long after everyone
knew about him.
I
have often had cause, in relation to a wide range of artists, to wonder if I
can love the music while hating the drugs. I have decided that I probably can. But
I am starting to doubt that. The elevation of Sex, Drugs and Rock'n'Roll into a
kind of national and global substitute for politics, patriotism and religion
has led both to the worship of idols and to the persecution of heretics.
While the law is the law, Page and Wyman didn't really do anything morally wrong.
ReplyDeleteThe age of consent was 13 until the late 19th century and it was only increased to 16 to combat prostitution, not because of any sudden discovery about when it's appropriate to have sex.
Now, I am only interested in fully grown women, but let's be honest, we're not talking about rape here, let alone paedophilia.
Yes, we are.
Delete