Remember, we must remain in NATO in order to defend us from Russia. Even though, as Daniel Larison writes:
Sweden will not make a formal bid to join NATO for fear
of escalating further the already tense situation that exists between the West
and Russia over the annexation of Crimea and the continued crisis in Ukraine,
the country’s defence minister said on 17 May.
That’s the right move for Sweden to make, and it does
remove a potential cause of friction between Russia and NATO.
Pursuing
membership in the alliance would have caused the Swedish government nothing but
headaches in exchange for a guarantee that it doesn’t need and wouldn’t receive
for many years.
Formal neutrality has worked very well for Sweden over the last
century, and it would be strange for them to abandon that tradition after all
this time.
“It is precisely the zone of
unincorporated countries made up by Finland and Sweden which supports the
stability of the Baltic Sea region.”
And so Finland will not be moving any closer to joining
the alliance anytime soon, despite the report published in Finland on the
possible effects of NATO membership, which, without outright suggesting it,
considered membership likely.
One obstacle is public opinion, and Finns who would be
supportive of possible Finnish membership remain very much the minority.
And
Sipilä, at least, intends to take public opinion into account.
Expanding the alliance into more of northern Europe
doesn’t make sense for these countries, and their governments are smart to
recognize that.
The good news for the alliance in this is that this closes the
door on one path to further expansion that the alliance doesn’t need and
shouldn’t be seeking.
No comments:
Post a Comment