Peter Hitchens writes:
Has anything been happening while
much of our media have been obsessed with a foreign contest between two
mediocrities for a post that isn’t as important as it looks? Well, how about
this blood-freezing statistic? More than 50 rapists have been let off with
cautions, without ever facing a trial.
No doubt you thought that cautions
were the sort of thing they gave to teenagers found drunk and flat on their
faces in the street. But rape? Isn’t that important? In fact, isn’t it – thanks
to political correctness – one of the few crimes that everyone still takes
seriously, even Guardian readers? And more than 50 rapists, who have admitted
the offence, have been given cautions for it? Shouldn’t the Government have
fallen? You might expect the Tories to make a fuss about this but –
now of course you remember – the Tories are in this Government and, in
fact, dominate it.
Actually, this is only a small
part of a much bigger problem uncovered by the Magistrates’ Association, whose
members had begun to wonder why business in their courts was getting so slack.
Had crime stopped? No, it hadn’t. Something else had happened. Criminals, the
Government and the police were co-operating in a vast project which benefits
everyone except the British public.
The police benefit because they
look as if they’re doing something, when they’re not. The criminals benefit
because they get let off so they can go and commit more crimes. And the
Government benefits because it does not have to build the hundred or so huge
new prisons that would be needed to house malefactors if we still took crime
seriously. Actually, it’s far worse than I can fully state here, a horrible
catalogue of unpunished evil, under which severe violence, child cruelty,
burglary and even blackmail have been dealt with through the law’s equivalent
of a shrug.
I plan to put a much fuller
version of this scandal on my blog in the next few days, drawn from the
jaw-dropping report by the Magistrates’ Association which should by now have
been on every newspaper front page in the country. When you read – as you often
do – that ‘crime is falling’, you must understand what this really means. It
means that large numbers of wicked acts are no longer considered as crimes by
the authorities. If we had the standards of 60 years ago, half the young people
in the country would be locked up. If the police and courts of that era had
judged crime by our standards, their prisons would have been empty.
It is not crime that has fallen,
it is partly our own moral standard, our expectation of good, considerate,
honest behaviour from our neighbours that has fallen. But it is also that the
police and the Government, seeking a quiet life, have found it easier and
cheaper to ignore wrongdoing until it gets out of control. Like all appeasement
of evil, this policy invites a reckoning in the future.
The promised much fuller version is here. Too long to reproduce, but an absolute must-read.
"If we had the standards of 60 years ago, half the young people in the country would be locked up."
ReplyDelete1-Can he prove half of young people are committing crimes?
2-What percentage of those crimes would warrant a prison sentence?
I mean you can already go to prison for making a joke on Facebook.