Here:
Attacks in Russia must be considered as serious as those in London and New York, and they require an international response since many countries in the world could be threatened, Neil Clark, journalist and broadcaster, told RT.
Attacks in Russia must be considered as serious as those in London and New York, and they require an international response since many countries in the world could be threatened, Neil Clark, journalist and broadcaster, told RT.
RT: We've heard a lot of
reaction from the international community. Will there be any action in your
opinion?
Neil Clark: It’s nice that the
NATO Chief condemned this terrible attack and yesterday’s attack as well. But
what we are going to do in concrete terms? Because the Western approach to
terrorism is very inconsistent. We are told, on the one hand, that the West
totally opposes terrorism and radicalism.
On the other hand we have the West
lining up with radical Islamic terrorists in Syria, backing Al-Qaeda which is
trying to topple a secular government now. The Syrian authorities actually
repelled an Al-Qaeda attempt to bomb the US embassy in Damascus in 2006. And
what the US is doing in response? They are trying to topple the Syrian
government.
So there is an inconsistency here and I think
that unless the West actually stops this inconsistent approach and actually
does fight terrorism across the world and work with Russia closely, these
problems will only continue to present a danger. But when terrorism occurs in
Russia, it’s a kind of dismissed or disregarded that it is not really the same
thing.
There have been some shocking articles in the Western media when similar
terrorist attacks have occurred in Russia; they were blaming the Russian
authorities for this.
For example, when there was a Moscow bombing in 2011, an article was saying that the Russians actually brought it on themselves by their policy towards Chechnya. And you wouldn’t write articles like that on the bombings in London, in New York. So I think there are double standards here.
For example, when there was a Moscow bombing in 2011, an article was saying that the Russians actually brought it on themselves by their policy towards Chechnya. And you wouldn’t write articles like that on the bombings in London, in New York. So I think there are double standards here.
We need to take these terrible attacks in Russia
very seriously, as seriously as we take these attacks in New York or in London.
Until this happens, until the West does take serious action… But I’m afraid we
are not going to take action needed to stop these attacks taking place in the
future.
RT: What kind of international action you are talking about?
RT: What kind of international action you are talking about?
NC: The West needs to change its
policy towards Russia because there is a war being carried against Russia.
That’s a kind of soft war, a propaganda war which has been orchestrated by the
Western neo-conservatives and what I call the “fake left” in Western
countries, which is actually trying to demonize Russia for any reason, whether
it’s Pussy Riot… whether it’s the gay rights law…
In terms of terror threats, I think, the West
should change its [alliance] with Saudi Arabia which is a major sponsor of
radical Islamic groups throughout the world. The trouble is, if you look at
Syria for example, the West is actually on the same side as the terrorists
because of its relations with Saudi Arabia and Israel, who both want the regime
in Syria to be removed.
So I think we need a shift in the Western
capitals. I think we need to work closer with Russia. We saw close cooperation
at the Boston bombings, when we had the Russian warnings about the Tsarnaev
brothers, but they were ignored by the Americans because again it’s Russian
warnings.
The West [must] cooperate more seriously with Russia, as equal partners, in this battle against the radical terror groups; that’s a major shift that’s got to happen. On the one hand, they say they are going to work with Russia; on the other hand, there is this kind of Cold War propaganda against Russia.
The West [must] cooperate more seriously with Russia, as equal partners, in this battle against the radical terror groups; that’s a major shift that’s got to happen. On the one hand, they say they are going to work with Russia; on the other hand, there is this kind of Cold War propaganda against Russia.
RT: Back to Volgograd - Two
attacks in less than 24 hours, both are now thought to have been carried out by
male suicide bombers. What kind of message do you think the attackers are
trying to send in that city now?
NC: They are clearly trying to
intimidate, to scare people. It’s their daily business, you know. Bombing
crowded buses on Monday morning, bombing railway stations…It’s about terrorism.
And of course this is linked again to the Olympics coming up; it’s an attempt
to scare people from going to the Olympics.
On the one hand, we have those in the West
telling people: “Don’t go to the Olympics because Russia has oppressive
laws on this or that… ”, on the other hand, we got terrorists. This is
psychological warfare going here and it’s about saying to Russian people, in
particular Southern Russians: “Look, we can get you wherever you go,
whether it’s a bus or a train station,” and trying to intimidate people.
The only response to this is of course
international action. Who knows who funds these people, who carried out those
attacks; it could be international, we don’t know. It requires an international
response because many countries in the world are threatened by this.
And what
can you do? You can’t put metal detectors on buses, it’s absolutely
impractical. So I think it needs a massive international response.
No comments:
Post a Comment