Neil Clark writes:
All we have to do to highlight the enormous hypocrisy and double standards which are the hallmark of domestic and international politics is to switch the names around.
Actions taken by Western establishment approved countries and actors which are deemed to be totally uncontroversial, would be deemed to be ‘absolutely outrageous’ if done to them.
Here’s a few examples:
Just imagine… if a close Russian ally, whose forces were trained by Russia, was bombing the poorest country in the Middle East, with cluster bombs supplied by Moscow.
Furthermore, in the country that was being attacked, a famine threatened the lives millions of people.
Well, the poorest country in the Middle East is Yemen, and it’s being bombed to smithereens by the one of the richest, Saudi Arabia, a close ally of Britain, using UK-made cluster bombs.
And guess what, the West’s Something Must Me Done brigade, who expressed so much ‘humanitarian’ concern over the fighting to regain Aleppo from Al-Qaeda/Al Nusra terrorists, are silent.
Just imagine… if a plane carrying members of a famous French military choir had crashed on Christmas Day, killing everyone on board.
And that shortly afterwards, a leading Russian ‘satirical’ magazine had mocked the tragedy, drawing cartoons of the choir singing to ‘a new audience’ on the seabed and posted a caption saying that the only ‘bad news’ about the crash was that French President François Hollande had not been on board.
There would, I’m sure, have been plenty of ‘superior’ discussion in Western media about the ‘moral depravity’ and the ‘dark soul’ of the Russian character.
But the plane that crashed was carrying Russian singers.
And it was the elite-approved Charlie Hebdo magazine that poked fun at the dead.
So there was no outcry in the West. And no accusations of racism.
Just imagine… if it had been NATO, and not the Warsaw Pact, which had been disbanded at the end of the old Cold War.
And then Russia, breaking the promises it had made to the US President, had expanded the Warsaw Pact right up to the borders of the USA, deploying thousands of troops and dozens of tanks and other military hardware in Mexico and Canada.
Would commentators in ‘respectable’ establishment journals be calling this ‘American aggression’? I think not.
Just imagine... if a senior political officer at the Russian Embassy in London had been caught on film talking about the ‘take down’ of a British Foreign Officer Minister deemed to be too critical of Russia and who was causing the country ‘a lot of problems.’
That there was a group called ‘Labour Friends of Russia’ and the political officer said the Embassy had a fund of more than £1m for them?
We can be sure that the revelations would have led, at the very least, to diplomatic expulsions, the announcement of a full-scale government investigation, as well as a plethora of articles on the ‘outrageous’ interference by Russia in British political affairs.
But the senior political officer caught on film was working for Israel, so a potential plot about the ’take down’ of a UK minister was deemed to be not a very important news story.
By more or less the same people who would have been telling us it was a very important news story if it had involved Russia.
Just imagine… if Hillary Clinton and not Donald Trump had won the US Presidential election in November and Trump’s supporters had behaved in the way that Clinton’s have.
That intelligence officials had tried to de-legitimize Clinton’s victory by claiming Saudi interference in the election, and produced as proof of this a document which drew attention to Saudi TV’s alleged pro-Clinton stance.
Then, a week before the inauguration of President-elect Clinton was due to take place, the US media publicized a dossier compiled by an ex-intelligence officer from another country claiming Saudi Arabia was blackmailing Clinton, even though the dossier was unverified and contained glaring factual errors.
The papers would I’m sure be full of commentary from ‘liberal’ pundits raging about a ‘coup’ and anti-democratic attempts to overturn the election result.
However, Trump won on November 8th, and not Clinton, so he’s fair game for Deep State attacks.
All in the name of democracy.
Just imagine… if UK Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn had urged MPs to support a socialist Peace Rocket, which would cost the British taxpayer at least £31 billion and possibly as much as £205 billion, over its lifetime.
That Corbyn had praised the Peace Rocket as being ‘worth every penny’ and absolutely essential for Britain and for the peace of the world.
Then, after Parliament had voted in favor, it came to light that the Peace Rocket had misfired on a test and that Corbyn had kept schtum about it.
That four times he had been asked by the BBC’s Andrew Marr if he had known about the misfire, and four times he had avoided answering the question.
We can be sure the calls for Corbyn to resign would have been deafening.
That there would have been fearsome denunciations of the ‘enormous waste' of taxpayers money on a ‘socialist vanity project.’
And that the vote on the ‘Peace Rocket’ would be held again.
But it was the elite-approved Trident and not a socialist ‘Peace Rocket’ that misfired, so the response has been very different.
We’re told the malfunction of Britain’s ‘independent nuclear deterrent,’ and the failure of the government to mention it before Parliament voted on renewal, is no big deal.
That the misfiring Trident is still worth spending billions of pounds of taxpayers money on at a time of austerity.
And of course, there is absolutely no need for Parliament to debate the issue again.
Just imagine... if Russia had spent $5 billion in trying to bring about a regime change in Canada, with neo-Nazis providing the ‘cutting edge’ of anti-government protests.
That torchlight processions by neo-Nazis and ultra-nationalists -commemorating wartime SS divisions were held in the new ‘democratic’ Canada.
We could expect widespread condemnations and denunciations of Russia’s ‘links’ to the ‘far right.’
But it's happening in Ukraine.
And guess what? The West’s ‘fascism is coming’ brigade are not the slightest bit interested.