John Lynch writes:
To all those working on the ‘Get
Corbyn’ strategy at The Guardian, do you remember all
those articles you were running a few years back on how people were apathetic
and disillusioned with politics in the UK?
So much so that they could scarcely
be bothered to vote.
Here let me remind
you:
The
Guardian has a whole section devoted to voter apathy, in fact. If we
go further back do you recall how trust in politicians was at an all-time low?
That’s what you told us:
Something must be
done you told us, something must change.
Well something has changed, I have never
seen a period when so many people have been passionately engaged with politics.
Perhaps the referendums on Scottish Independence and EU membership are partly
responsible, but the main reason is Jeremy Corbyn.
Now, we all know that
the Parliamentary Labour Party never had any intention of allowing Corbyn
to lead the party.
It was a mistake. They underestimated the hunger so many people have for an alternative to the neoliberal consensus.
It was a mistake. They underestimated the hunger so many people have for an alternative to the neoliberal consensus.
But Corbyn was
elected with a huge mandate and his leadership of the Labour Party has
seen meeting halls packed out, a huge increase in membership and most
hearteningly a groundswell of enthusiasm from younger voters.
I would have thought
you would be delighted with this new energy pouring into the democratic process. But instead of celebrating, you seem hell bent on destroying it. Why?
Why do you keep
telling lies about Jeremy Corbyn and his supporters?
Why do you have a merry-go-round
of paid columnists rubbishing, smearing and distorting his every word and
action?
Why are you manufacturing news articles on a daily basis
to cast his leadership and legitimacy into question?
Let me tell you what your readers
say about you now – comments posted on our own humble blog:
"I actually have to thank
The Guardian for it’s extreme anti-Corbynism stance – if I hadn’t been so
disgusted at their non-journalistic lie, smear and spin campaign, I might never
have investigated further – and joined the Labour Party!"
Not quite the result you were
looking for I guess – here’s another:
"The Guardian HAS become
part of the establishment and I wonder whether newspapers as a whole are on the
way out.
"The Internet provides far more up to date information and I have only
a passing interest in reading what happened yesterday, unless the journalism is
high quality which it rarely is.
"I am more likely to read more specialised
magazines or simply rely on social media for my news and info."
These comments rank as generous
tributes compared to what your online readership thinks about you –
doesn’t that concern you?
Don’t you have a
moral duty as journalists to report the truth? Isn’t that the basis of your
position and status within society? Isn’t that what you were trained to do?
To list all the
instances of your ‘Get Corbyn’ strategy is beyond the scope of a letter (we
would need a book or perhaps a new online encyclopaedia) but here are a few.
Added to these
blatantly false stories are the hundreds of deliberately slanted and wilfully
misleading articles whose sole aim is to undermine and bully Corbyn and his
supporters.
The focus of your
‘Get Corbyn’ strategy is to smear his supporters as abusive, racist,
bullies – what a way to encourage people to participate in politics!
All of the people
who have recently joined the Labour Party, the Momentum movement and who have
attended rallies up and down the land don’t have the advantages you have.
They
don’t have comfortable salaries, a secure job or the resources of a
multi-million pound media behemoth to speak for them.
So we have to wonder,
who are the real bullies here? Perhaps you are.
If you succeed in
your aim to silence Corbyn and the alternative political narrative he
represents, will you be proud of yourselves? Well?
Proud that you stood
shoulder-to-shoulder with some of the wealthiest and most powerful people
in Britain so you could brow beat a popular movement for change amongst
ordinary voters?
Proud that
you managed to subvert real engagement in democracy amongst the
young people who will spend their lives clearing up after our mistakes?
Proud that you
betrayed the ethics of your profession so you could defend your own cosy
relationship with the establishment?
I don’t expect that
you will answer this letter – it seems The Guardian floats above the despair
and disgust of its readership these days.
But at least do one thing –
spare us the sanctimony.
Spare us the
hand wringing about the collapse of the wages of British workers,
the privatisation of the NHS, the rise in food banks, the
rise in homelessness, the rise in child poverty, the chaos in the Middle
East and the terrorism that we have helped to foment, the destruction of the
environment and the insidious extension of corporate power over all
aspects of our lives.
But most of all,
please spare us the abject hypocrisy of whining about
British apathy towards politics.
Let it never be
forgotten that when masses of people of all ages tried to get
involved in politics, to have a voice, to have a vote and to make a meaningful
difference – your role was to try and bully them back into silence.
You continue to
misrepresent the views of this new political engagement, to smear their
peaceful protests and to glowingly promote the frantic and ugly
scramblings of the neoliberal consensus to retain control.
You have let us
and yourselves down. You do not deserve to inherit the credibility,
respect and authority that The Guardian’s proud history has bequeathed to
you.
But consider
yourself warned.
A whole generation of bloggers, commentators, independent
journalists and free news websites is filling the space that you
have vacated.
We won’t let you squash this new democratic impulse without a
fight.
If The Guardian
simply runs out of supporters and money one day soon then don’t blame
social media for your demise.
Your lack of integrity and relevance is all your own work.
No comments:
Post a Comment