Aditya Chakrabortty writes:
I have seen the future of housing for working-class
Londoners, and it is frightening.
It is a land of flats so broken that the children who live in them are hospitalised. Where families have to live among condemned electrics and mouse infestations.
Where nails poke up from carpets, tearing the skin off babies’ feet, while parents are driven mad trying to get an apparently indifferent landlord to fix things.
It is a land of flats so broken that the children who live in them are hospitalised. Where families have to live among condemned electrics and mouse infestations.
Where nails poke up from carpets, tearing the skin off babies’ feet, while parents are driven mad trying to get an apparently indifferent landlord to fix things.
You phone the repairs service only to
get an engaged tone or to be shouted at (something that the women kept
mentioning).
Meanwhile, you and your young children have to endure things that
no family living in one of the richest cities on the planet should have to
suffer.
From day one, Shaheda’s windows
let in so much wind that the entire family would have to swaddle themselves in
coats and jumpers – and even then “it would feel like winter inside”.
Just
before her youngest was born, she says she pleaded with Tando not to put the
newborn through this. Her baby kept catching colds, had difficulty breathing,
would fall asleep but wouldn’t wake up.
The boy was kept in hospital and put on
steroids and a nebuliser.
The lasting trauma of this and other episodes in the
flat, she believes, has been to make her son withdrawn, scared to be without
his mum and dad.
Even as she recalled the details,
tears came to Shaheda’s eyes.
At the time, the 30-year-old came “close to a
breakdown”, crying constantly and unable to sleep.
One thought tortured her:
“Because of these poxy windows, my son’s suffering so badly. I can’t get help
from anyone. I can’t do anything.”
Forget Downing Street speeches
on social mobility: if we want our children to be and do the best
they can, we must give them decent and safe homes.
But what these women were
describing was squalor – of a kind that Henry Mayhew and the other Victorians
would have recognised.
That squalor made a mockery of their attempts to get on
and bring up their families.
While graduate Lavinia shared her dreams of
becoming a social worker, raising the kids well, perhaps one day buying a
house, I looked around at the baby photos and the signs reading “Eat Your
Greens” and “Family: Where Life Begins and Love Never Ends”.
What chance did
she give to achieving those sensible, modest goals? “Not likely.”
She, her
family, and all their talent and promise are being squandered.
Who pays for this dilapidation? Us, the taxpayers.
Although the flats are public property, Tando sets the rent. It is of course
much higher than council charges – and it is largely met through our housing
benefit bill.
Even while paying far more for much less, Lavinia and her
neighbours have none of the security of tenure routine for Newham tenants.
Lavinia started on a year-long tenancy, but it now rolls over from week to week.
Insecurity at the bottom, booming
business at the top – coupled with convenient denials where it matters.
Newham
council told me that it “closely monitors the service provided by Tando”, and
that officers “meet regularly with the directors” of the company.
Yet despite
the stories above and many others like them, Newham has not only renewed its
contract with Tando for another few years but handed it another 210 units to
manage.
Tando director Harry Antoniou told me that the vast majority of tenants
are very satisfied with their accommodation.
He did admit to issues with a
small group of tenants but claimed they were “historic”.
But if that’s the case, it’s
probably because the tenants have, together with community activists’ group Peach,
spent months protesting their conditions.
Last month they finally met Antoniou.
Since then Tando repair men have begun putting things right.
In 21st-century
London, it apparently takes a mass rebellion to get a functioning sink.
Meanwhile, Tando’s parent company Omega is expanding into
the rest of the country, and is now Birmingham
city council’s “social lettings agency” – shifting residents there off the
waiting list into private rental accommodation.
And Omega was bought in 2014 by
Mears – a company that specialises in outsourced social housing and care for
the elderly – for around £40m.
Remember that this is happening
in a London borough whose mayor, Robin Wales, allegedly
told a young woman a couple of years ago that “if you can’t afford to live in
Newham, you can’t afford to live in Newham”.
Remember that the supposedly
socially aware Theresa May was part of a government that brought in the Housing
Act, which will finally kill off
council housing in
inner London.
Remember that the austerity programme Britain is still enduring
is seeing a mass privatisation of remaining state assets – including public
land.
Then go to Custom House, because what you’re seeing there isn’t a one-off
scandal: it’s the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment