So much for the safeguarding-industrial complex. The reason that it can find so much time to, say, try and stop me from contesting elections due to the racism of its functionaries is because it is doing absolutely nothing else at all.
By the way, it has a total disregard for things like data protection. It sees itself as a single entity, passing malicious and scurrilous material within itself with no concept that, for example, different religious bodies were distinct organisations. The law is its weapon, its instrument of State power. It has no sense of being bound by the law. And religious bodies are merely host bodies, as are various others, for its parasitic exercise of that power.
The scandalous allegation against me on 2nd March 2020 was recanted under oath at Durham Crown Court on 11th of that month, calling gravely into question my convictions the next day by exposing that key character witness as unreliable, a fact that was not mentioned in closing statements or in summation.
Unless, as is widely assumed, the real reason for them is the content of this book, then the sanctions imposed upon me in my absence on 2nd March 2020 are void. I expect a written apology by 30th September 2021, and for it to be published in full in The Northern Cross. Financially, I would then settle for the reimbursement of my victim surcharges. One would not wish to have to sue the Church.
If I were still subject to any sanction by the Church at the time of the next General Election, and if I were to be defeated at that Election, then I would seek to have that result overturned in the courts on grounds of undue spiritual influence.
Spot on, if they were any good this report would have said something totally different.
ReplyDeleteYes, although that assumes that they really do exist for their official purpose.
Delete