Steve Topple writes:
Around 2,700 teaching assistants from Durham are facing the
sack, in a move by the local authority to save money.
The plan, which will see
the staff then re-employed on new contracts, means a 23% pay cut for them.
And
it bears striking similarities to the story of Manchester’s
firefighters, previously reported in The
Canary.
We value teaching assistants, but…
In May, Durham County Council voted
to change teaching assistants’ contracts, so they would only be paid for
term-time work.
Currently, the staff earn around £20,000.
But
the new contract would see many lose up to £5,000, with some having
to actually work more hours.
The council claims that it brings teaching assistants’
pay in line with other council workers, and estimates that it will save schools
around £3m from their budgets.
Defending the move, Councillor Jane
Brown said:
We greatly value the work undertaken by teaching
assistants which is why we have tried incredibly hard to resolve this situation
and reach an agreement with them.
We have carried out two consultations and revised and doubled our compensation offer regarding the move to term-time working and delayed the implementation of these changes to April 2017.
We have talked in detail with the conciliation service, ACAS, and removed the dismiss and re-engage clause if the teaching assistants will accept this last and final offer.
We have carried out two consultations and revised and doubled our compensation offer regarding the move to term-time working and delayed the implementation of these changes to April 2017.
We have talked in detail with the conciliation service, ACAS, and removed the dismiss and re-engage clause if the teaching assistants will accept this last and final offer.
She added:
We have a legal and moral
responsibility to address this issue and will not benefit financially in any
way – except to remove the risk of equal pay claims from other staff who are
only paid for the hours they actually work.
Ripping off council staff
But the teaching assistants
disagree.
They say that their current salaries are for term-time work, but are merely
paid over 12 months.
They reject the idea of working more hours so they can
earn more money, as many of them can’t commit to this.
And they argue that this
is a cost-saving exercise, but one that will hit already low-paid families the
hardest.
A spokesperson for the Durham teaching
assistants told The Canary:
Some
dedicated, experienced teaching assistants have already left their jobs, unable
to deal with the stress of this situation.
Many others will be forced to leave if these proposals go ahead. Some have already sold their homes, frightened that they will have to sell in a hurry if these proposals go ahead.
Others know they will have to do so when their pay is cut. We are fighting for our futures, the future of our profession and the future of our schools and the children in them.
Many others will be forced to leave if these proposals go ahead. Some have already sold their homes, frightened that they will have to sell in a hurry if these proposals go ahead.
Others know they will have to do so when their pay is cut. We are fighting for our futures, the future of our profession and the future of our schools and the children in them.
Labour: the party of workers?
The council made one final offer last week; to increase
the period of compensation from one to two years.
On 21 September, a meeting
was held at Durham Miners’ Hall, where the offer was unofficially voted on, and
rejected.
Hundreds turned out, many in support of the teaching assistants, and
speakers included members of newly-formed County Durham Teaching Assistants
Activists Committee (CDTAA) and the Association of Teachers and
Lecturers.
CDTAA described the vote as a:
resounding rejection of the so-called compromise proposal
with no dissenters… The fight goes on.
An official union ballot on the council’s offer will take
place, with the result expected on 29 September.
If this offer is formally
rejected by union members, the council will sack the 2,700 teaching assistants
on 3 October, re-employing them on new contracts in January.
Industrial action
may well then be on the cards.
A spokesperson for Durham teaching assistants
told The
Canary:
Teaching assistants are well
aware that industrial action will have a huge impact on families, children and
schools and it is not a decision they will take lightly.
But they feel they have no choice as the only negotiation by DCC has been to the timescale for implementing these life-changing pay cuts.
But they feel they have no choice as the only negotiation by DCC has been to the timescale for implementing these life-changing pay cuts.
While to the council the teaching
assistants may just be numbers, there are real stories behind these cuts. As
teaching assistant Lindsay Dawson explained in a letter The Guardian:
I am one of the 2,700 teaching assistants who will be dismissed and re-engaged if Durham county council goes ahead with this ridiculous proposal (Who will speak up for teaching assistants?, 10 September).
It saddens me to think that due to these decisions I could be forced out of a job that I absolutely adore and have done for the past 13 years in the same school – forced out due to the fact that the proposal would leave me desperately short on my monthly bills and I would have to seek alternative employment to survive.
No one, in my eyes, can live off a salary for 13 years and then take a 23% pay cut when they are already very poorly paid.
As a parent, I also worry that my own child may not receive the same excellent level of support in his own education if other teaching assistants choose to do the same.
I manage on my wage without living an extravagant lifestyle because I love the job I do and the children I work with.
From educator, to support, to cleaner, to cook, to confidante, social worker and many more, my job is more than just washing paint pots and sharpening pencils.
May I just ask under a Labour council should I be in a position now where I would be better off (financially) if I finished work and went on benefits? This is the truth of my situation.
Lindsay Dawson
West Rainton, County Durham
Essentially, as is the case with
the firefighters, the hand of teaching assistants is being forced.
Either they
accept the new terms and conditions of their employment, or they’re sacked.
Furthermore, another striking similarity is that both these attacks on workers
are being carried out by Labour-controlled bodies.
The Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service,
with the firefighters, and Durham County Council with the teaching assistants.
It would
seem that local Labour representatives are at odds with Jeremy Corbyn’s stance,
as both firefighters and teaching assistants have been shown solidarity by the Labour leader and
his team.
But there’s another similarity
between these groups of under-attack workers. They will not be backing down
without a fight.
Get Involved!
–Donate to the CDTAA crowdfunding page, to
support their action.
No comments:
Post a Comment