Here:
The Haze was amused to read a
recent slew of articles in The Guardian, insisting that the Labour
Party has been afflicted by some terrible disease and is close to death.
Voters
are getting involved in politics it seems and this has got The Guardian
terribly upset.
In this vitriolic piece Nick
Cohen smears colleague Seamus Milne as being part of a Corbyn
“insurgency” and Paul Mason for “taking braggart swagger and cocksure
certainties of newspaper punditry into politics”.
The article drips with anger
and bile – but after reading it (and many others) it strikes us that it is
not The Labour Party that is in danger of expiring – but The Guardian.
Rewind to December of
last year and we see The Guardian
Media Group losing money – losses so serious
that GMG proposed axing 250 jobs (13% of its
workforce) including 100 posts in editorial.
Look at this chart of
losses since 2008.
Not many companies can consistently lose this kind of money – the GMG can
only do so because it had assets to sell, namely its stakes in
Auto Trader Ascential,
these one-off windfalls are now behind it.
GMG is widely expected to lose
more money this year.
New editor Katharine Viner knew who was really to blame –
social media!
In this revealing article, poor Kath claims
that Facebook and Twitter are “threatening the funding of public-interest
reporting” and have “disrupted the truth”.
A more self-aware
editor might pause and reflect on why people are turning away from the
former flagship of the liberal media. found that only 11%
of articles about Jeremy Corbyn in the main UK print titles were free
of distortion and bias – The Guardian fares better than the Daily Mail, but if one were to include all the smear opinion pieces and insidiously
dishonest Live Blogs then the gap between The Guardian and The Sun starts to
look wafer thin.
The Guardian has been caught red handed inventing
stories about sexist abuse against
Laura Kuenssberg and anti-Semitism in the Labour Party.
Its
nakedly aggressive and dishonest campaign against Corbyn has
poisoned the well of support from its own constituency – its
coverage derided daily by its own online readership.
The Guardian no
longer produces “public interest Journalism” but instead produces “Guardian
interest journalism” – that is, news manufactured to defend the very cushy
relationship that The Guardian has with the political establishment
and the powerful.
John McDonnell’s
critique of Labour MP’s plotting to oust Jeremy Corbyn was spot on
when he said:
This coup isn’t about Jeremy
Corbyn. This coup isn’t about him, this is about you…
This is the 1% telling the 99% to
‘get back in your place.’ …
That is also the
function of The Guardian’s attacks on Corbyn – “voters, know your limits!” The
Guardian acts as THE gatekeeper of the so
called “liberal” media.
They use their dominant brand and
position within the global marketplace to set limits and boundaries on
what people are allowed to choose, think and discuss.
It is because The Guardian colludes
with the establishment in setting these limits that they are
fêted and rewarded by the very system that they are supposed to be holding
to account.
Guardian staff get to
hobnob with celebrity, wealth and power precisely because they are no threat to
it.
As we outlined some time ago, The Guardian is
owned and run by people with a vested interest in corporate power and that
includes its journalists, paid opinion spinners and editors.
When one looks
objectively at the role The Guardian now plays in the world, one has to wonder
if the stench of death can already be smelt over this media behemoth.
The Guardian batted
for Ed Miliband and his weakly diluted neoliberal politics – the
voters ignored them.
Then they batted for Yvette Cooper in the Labour
leadership election – the voters ignored them.
Then they batted for the EU
– the voters ignored them.
Now they are waving all their fists with infantile
rage against Jeremy Corbyn and his supporters – but he is more popular than
ever, and the Labour Party is now the biggest socialist movement in Europe.
What is the point of
The Guardian now? Nobody with even a vague interest in progressive
politics trusts it anymore.
It cannot deliver swings in public opinion because
its opinions are known in advance and vast chunks of its audience are no
longer listening.
It doesn’t campaign
for anything that might threaten the status quo – all its bluster about
“fearless journalism” is just spin.
The Guardian’s anticipatory
compliance with the establishment view has been so exposed in recent
years that its no longer even worth discussing.
Does the world really
need another group of stenographers for the wealthy and powerful?
I think we
can all get through another week without another lecture from Polly Toynbee or
Suzanne Moore on the evils of voters getting involved in politics.
The Guardian’s
influence is eroding every day as it becomes a parody of its own neoliberal
values.
It is running out of money, haemorrhaging staff and shows
not a trace of the self-awareness needed to rebuild its brand.
Katharine Viner and crew continue on their right-wing suicide mission, blaming
everyone else for their lack of integrity and relevance.
Against this
backdrop, the Labour Party is ahead in the polls, has seen a quite
extraordinary resurgence in membership, and is dealing with its
extreme right-wing dinosaurs with each day that passes.
I would suggest to
Nick Cohen and all the other smug shills at The Guardian that they should worry
more about themselves than about the Labour Party.
But if the
unthinkable were to happen and The Guardian were to close, who would miss it?
Tony Blair?
No comments:
Post a Comment