Wednesday 23 November 2022

We Mean Business

I pity whoever does media relations for HSBC after this. Michelle Mone is not really a businesswoman at all. This is not business, any more than the people over whom Keir Starmer fawns are meaningfully engaged in any such pursuit.

The withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union, including the Single Market and the Customs Union, provides a double opportunity, both to reorganise the British economy under State direction, and to begin to develop a fully independent British foreign policy, including in relation to the United States. On that basis, Britain could be entering a new pro-business age.

The pro-business tradition came down to the Attlee Government from the ultraconservative figures of Colbert and Bismarck, via the Liberals Keynes and Beveridge, and it held sway in Britain until the Callaghan Government's turn to monetarism in December 1976.

That tradition corresponds closely but critically to the Hamiltonian American School as expanded by the American System of Henry Clay, a pro-business tradition that between the 1860s and the 1970s worked to make the United States the world's largest economy, with the world's highest standard of living, culminating in the glorious achievements of the New Deal, which in turn made possible the Civil Rights movement.

With a strict division between investment banking and retail banking, large amounts of central government credit, over a long term and at low if any rates of interest, would build great national projects, notably enormous expansions in infrastructure. Those would then pay for themselves many times over, ably assisted by pro-business tariffs and subsidies, and by a pro-business National Bank to promote the growth of productive enterprises rather than speculation.

A sovereign state with its own free floating, fiat currency has as much of that currency as it chooses to issue to itself, with readily available fiscal and monetary means of controlling any inflationary effect. Those means therefore require to be under democratic political control.

For the good of business, we should implement Theresa May's original Prime Ministerial agenda of workers' and consumers' representation in corporate governance, shareholders' control over executive pay, restrictions on pay differentials within companies, an investment-based Industrial Strategy and infrastructure programme including greatly increased housebuilding, action against tax avoidance including a ban on public contracts for tax-avoiding companies, a real cap on energy prices, a ban or significant restrictions on foreign takeovers, a ban on unpaid internships, and an inquiry into Orgreave.

For the good of business, the approval of the House of Commons should be required for changes to interest rates, a strict Glass-Steagall division should be introduced between investment banking and retail banking, the Freedom of Information Act should be extended to the City of London, its municipal franchise should be conformed to that of local government in general, all tax havens under British jurisdiction should be closed, non-domiciled tax status should be abolished, the Big Four accounting firms should be broken up, auditors should be banned by Statute from selling extras, they should have unlimited liability, Crown immunity should be abolished, and Limited Partnerships and Limited Liability Partnerships should be required to have at least one member who was a natural person resident in the United Kingdom.

For the good of business, the State should buy a stake in every FTSE 500 company, large enough to secure Board-level representation, for the exercise of which both the First and the Second Lords of the Treasury would be accountable to the House of Commons, so that after any investment in public services, the dividends would be distributed equally to everyone by the Treasury.

And for the good of business, public bodies and public contractors should be required by Statute to buy British wherever possible and to buy local wherever possible, while employment rights should begin with employment and apply regardless of the number of hours worked, leading to a four-day working week as soon as practicable.

We are heading for a hung Parliament. To strengthen families and communities by securing economic equality and international peace through the democratic political control of the means to those ends, including national and parliamentary sovereignty, we need to hold the balance of power. Owing nothing to either main party, we must be open to the better offer. There does, however, need to be a better offer. Not a lesser evil, which in any case the Labour Party is not. 

12 comments:

  1. That would be a start, anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The people predicting the present hyper-inflation and hospital waiting lists during the disastrous lockdown were silenced and drowned in abuse at the time. They were right.

    As consumer price inflation jumps to 14% and Jeremy Hunt launches a wave of dreadful tax rises and spending cuts likely to last decades to balance the books.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You predicted every manifestation of the Apocalypse, and since some of those were bound to turn up eventually, then you could always claim vindication. But these things were not caused because you were mildly inconvenienced for the first time in your lives. They were caused by the brief experiment with the economic policies that you had insisted forever were the only commensensical ones, and so much a part of the natural order that there ought not even to have been a word for them.

      Delete
  3. the economic policies that you had insisted forever were the only commensensical ones

    Nobody on the Right has ever suggested unfunded tax cuts (as opposed to ones funded by spending cuts) are sensible, still less an unfunded £100 billion welfare payment for energy bills to every household in the country.

    Unfunded tax and spending is what socialists do.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You got lucky beyond your wildest dreams, and look what happened. You need to go away.

      Delete
  4. Peter Hitchens predicted both the present inflation crisis and budget black hole (and Rishi Sunak’s future tax rises to pay for it) during lockdown in 2020.

    Hitchens…”I warned clearly in March 2020 that the out-of-proportion reaction to Covid would lead to this crisis. I said: 'Our economy is still crippled, and the overpraised Chancellor Rishi Sunak, like some beaming Dr Feelgood with a case full of dodgy stimulants, seeks to soothe the pain by huge injections of funny money. 'He will get this back from us as soon as we are allowed out again. Just you wait till you get the bill, in increased taxes, inflation and devastated savings.'”

    And it came to pass, just as I said it would.”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If you predict that the thing that you dislike will lead to each and every form of fire and brimstone, then eventually one of them is bound to happen, and you can claim to have been vindicated. The anti-Brexit lot are the same.

      Delete
  5. He didn’t predict it would lead to “every form of fire and brimstone”-he accurately predicted that pumping half a trillion into a frozen economy would lead to hyper inflation that would eat our savings and a huge hole in our public finances that would be paid for with dreadful tax rises and spending cuts for everyone.

    Any semi economically literate person could have predicted the same.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, that last line is correct, anyway. Although, whatever his other accomplishments, that is rather generous to Hitchens.

      Delete
  6. It would be generous to you. As you clearly don’t know what inflation is or what causes it, do you? No economic body in the world denies it’s been caused by our response to Covid by the way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You need to let this one go. You are just making yourself look silly. But if you people did let this one go, then what would you have? Oh, well, there we are.

      Delete