Monday 28 November 2022

Where The Dragon Really Is

If the diminutive demonstrations in China were any threat to the regime in that gigantic country, then they would already have been suppressed without mercy. Their ephemeral nature is evident from the fact that they are still happening at all. The real story is the emphatic vote of Taiwan for the principle of One China, throwing out the existing puppet of the same CIA that was trying and failing to foment unrest in the cities of the Mainland.

What is Taiwanese nationalism? Just as everyone knows how bad Vladimir Putin is, but that does not alter the Nazi roots and character of Ukrainian nationalism, so the wickedness of Xi Jinping, or indeed the heavy baggage that the Koumintang brings with it, does not alter the fact that Lee Teng-hui always regarded Japanese as his first language and Tokyo as the cultural capital of his wider civilisation.

A volunteer Second Lieutenant in the Imperial Japanese Army until the very end of the Second World War, Lee stood in the same tradition as Park Chung-hee, the dictator of South Korea from 1961 to 1979, who had been an officer in the Japanese Manchukuo Army that had occupied Manchuria. These are the heroic Asian Tigers of successive generations of the same neoliberals who have always lionised Augusto Pinochet. To put it mildly, their economic system neither requires democracy, nor necessarily upholds it.

Japan itself is run by people who believe, “that Japan should be applauded for liberating much of East Asia from Western colonial powers; that the 1946–1948 Tokyo War Crimes tribunals were illegitimate; and that killings by Imperial Japanese troops during the 1937 Nanjing Massacre were exaggerated or fabricated,” as well as that the comfort women were not coerced. The first of those, at least, has been a widespread view in several of those countries at the time and since. Indonesia, as such, is a direct product of it, since the Japanese-backed rulers of the Dutch East Indies simply declared independence under that name at the end of the War. See also Park Chung-hee, and the Lee Teng-hui whose heirs the Taiwanese electorate has just ejected.

The India to which both main parties in Britain are so keen to cosy up is run by the heirs of Mahatma Gandhi’s Nazi-linked assassins, and it has always recognised among the fathers of the nation the likes of Subhas Chandra Bose, who raised an army in support of Japan. He has featured on stamps six times, and on coins three times. Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose International Airport is the aviation hub for the whole of eastern and northeastern India. There is also a Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Island. Yes, an island. Up to a point, it is understandable that Rishi Sunak might feel some affinity with Narendra Modi. But Keir Starmer has no excuse.

We are heading for a hung Parliament. To strengthen families and communities by securing economic equality and international peace through the democratic political control of the means to those ends, including national and parliamentary sovereignty, we need to hold the balance of power. Owing nothing to either main party, we must be open to the better offer. There does, however, need to be a better offer. Not a lesser evil, which in any case the Labour Party is not.

8 comments:

  1. Indeed Taiwan is a free country whose people can vote out those in power-unlike its tyrannical neighbour. And its people most certainly did not vote for "the principle of One China" (don't talk such ridiculous nonsense). It was a local election about local issues and when it comes to the national elections, the ruling party will of course retain power. Free democracies don't tend to vote to join a tyranny.

    “The election results will give the KMT a lot of confidence, but if they believe this means that their positions are now more popular with the electorate than the other party’s, they are probably mistaken,” said Nathan Batto, a research fellow at Academia Sinica in Taipei.
    "“All the polling data we have points to the picture that the KMT is far less popular than the DPP, and their positions towards China are far less popular than the DPP’s. They just have a lot more popular local politicians in office right now.”

    There you have it.


    Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found at https://www.ft.com/tour.
    https://www.ft.com/content/a6c20e0c-7f07-45e2-b8ff-f32cdf74c1e7

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "All the polling data we have points to the picture that the KMT is far less popular than the DPP"? Apart from the election results, obviously.

      There is plenty wrong with the KMT, but even so. It was the DPP that chose to make these elections about, in Tsai's words, "opposing China and defending Taiwan". It has got its answer. How often does a President resign as party leader because of local election results anywhere? Yet that has happened here.

      Delete
  2. They’re local election results-the polling data shows of course the KMT will lose the national election (which really is about China) as they always will.

    Hardly surprising that a free democracy wouldn’t vote in favour of a police-state-where the people aren’t allowed to vote at all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tsai has already resigned, which says it all. And the DPP is Liberal International. It is the KMT that is your lot in the IDU.

      Delete
  3. Local elections are about bin collections not national policy-the national elections will produce the same result as always because those actually influence national policy and the people of Taiwan )funnily enough) prefer freedom to communist tyranny.

    Although the President’s resignation highlights another important difference between Taiwan and its neighbour (other than the obvious fact they are allowed to vote at all) which is that in Taiwan politicians actually take responsibility for poor results. China’s leaders never resign over anything, even when they’re burning people to death in buildings due to a “Covid lockdown.”

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You have obviously never been involved in a local election. Although even I have never heard of one the result of which caused a President or Prime Minister to resign as Party Leader.

      Delete
  4. Across Africa in one post and Asia in this one, you take it all in. Amazing.

    ReplyDelete