Freelance journalist and Independent political activist, open to offers in both capacities. Contact firstname.lastname@example.org. Accepts PayPal.
I did laugh when Hilary Tweeted immediately after: "Shameful. We can't allow this man to be President."Er, your husband?
If the cards fell right over the next week or so, then we could be rid of Trump and the Clintons alike.
Trump's a scumbag, but the social justice warriors can't be allowed to bring him down.
Why not, as long as in so doing they take her with him?
SJWs? No, it's the Religious Right, especially the Mormons. They never did like him.
The thing with the Mormons looks like a Las Vegas turf war, as much as anything else.
Out of the two, I agree with Hitchens that Clinton is by far the more dangerous.He did at least oppose the Iraq War and wants peace with Russia, hence this week's fevered allegations that Putin is trying to interfere in the US elections by hacking Hilary's emails.
It is not at all clear that Trump opposed the war in Iraq.
Desperate stuff over on Harry's Place, casting George Galloway as Donald Trump following Galloway's threat to put up against any attempt by Blair to get back into the Commons.
He did indeed oppose it and had produced evidence to that effect and his foreign policy towards Russia is much more enlightened than hers.Hence the Establishment is all behind her and is now claiming Russia is intervening in the election on his behalf.It may even be true.