Gisela Stuart writes:
On 23rd June, we will have a once-in-a-generation
chance to decide whether to remain a member of the European Union. We should vote to leave it—this is the
left-wing choice.
David Cameron started
his negotiations, he said that if the reform package offered to the UK wasn’t
good enough, he would recommend that Britain reject it.
Now that he has struck
a deal, he’s predicting hellfire and brimstone if Britain votes to leave. His
concern over the risks of Brexit seems sudden. Was his initial display of EU scepticism
insincere?
Having promised fundamental reform,
Cameron came back with little more than an exemption from the (largely
symbolic) phrase “ever closer union,” a brake on in-work benefits to EU
migrants, and protection for the City of London as a financial hub.
Welcome as
these things are, they amount to mere tinkering.
Cameron is now encouraging us to
move on from these specifics to see the “big picture”—why Brexit would harm our
international standing. This was expected: he never thought he could achieve
fundamental reform.
Nor did he ever seriously think Britain might be better off
outside the EU; he called the referendum to placate Eurosceptics within his
party and to keep Ukip at bay.
I do not have much in common politically with
either group, but I agree with them that we must leave the European Union. I am
convinced that the UK can and must do better.
I am puzzled that the Labour Party seems
to have mislaid its radical roots.
Why are we storming the barricades to be on
the side of the FTSE 100, the status quo, and an institution that threw
millions of young people on the unemployment scrapheap in Greece, Italy, Spain
and Portugal just to save the euro?
True, in the 1980s the EU’s Delors
Commission gave British women the equal pay that the Thatcher
government denied us.
But it was a Labour government that gave us the minimum
wage, increased parental leave, and brought in legislation to deal with gang
masters—and that fought for rights for temporary, part-time and agency workers
in the face of opposition from the Tories and other EU countries.
Without
national protections and rights for workers, the free movement of labour
championed by the EU is little more than a race to the bottom. Leaving the EU will not mean a
tearing up of workers’ contracts.
Anyone who argues that the EU protects
workers’ rights should look no further than how the troika (the European
Central Bank, European Commission and International Monetary Fund) demolished
workers’ rights in Greece and other countries that received an EU bailout.
And
how significant are rights like guaranteed holidays if our steel industry has
to close? The consistent rulings of the European Court of Justice have put
business interests above workers.
The Laval and Viking Line cases in 2007, for
example, placed restrictions on the right of employees to strike.
In addition, the EU has become
institutionally incapable of change. EU leaders should allow countries like
Greece to leave the common currency without anyone suggesting that they must
then leave the Union.
Some member states will in future want to join up to
the common currency, which will require deeper political and fiscal
integration. Other countries will not.
The structure of the EU’s institutions,
the way decisions are made, must be built to cope with such complexity.
The EU has to
stop undermining NATO, believing it can replace it. Independent European
military capacity is much discussed but rarely delivered. I cannot think
of a single significant military operation the EU could have executed without
NATO assets.
We keep spending less and less, hoping the US will fill the
void, but the US wants us to step up and provide capacity.
The real danger is
that the US may decide it is no longer prepared to underwrite our collective
defence, leaving us dangerously exposed.
This links to the need for a policy
of offering countries in our neighbourhood alternatives to EU membership, such
as a trading relationship.
We may want to reflect on the longstanding
shortcomings of our relationship with countries like Turkey, which has wanted
to be part of the European project for decades.
If Britain votes to remain, we will
have endorsed a short-term fix in a referendum that won’t be held again for
decades.
Moreover, the next time a British Prime Minister were to ask the EU to
give Britain special treatment, they would be rejected on the grounds that
Britons have given their democratic endorsement.
Rather than being terrified by
the prospect of leaving, we should be excited by it. It is natural to huddle
together in a time of crisis and to fear the unknown, but these are impulses to
be fought.
I reject the stifling establishment
consensus across the political parties. The EU has fulfilled its dream of
preventing war between France and Germany. It now needs a new one—and so does
the United Kingdom.
That’s why I will vote to leave.
great piece, as a labour supporter im with labourleave, we want out for a left wing choice, not supporting tories, we want out for different reasons as well as some we have common ground on..but i remember the troika treating the greeks like leppers..democratic countrys told to do as they are told by undemocratic brussels
ReplyDelete