Gregory Pichorowycz writes:
In Britain, the recession has left many people
struggling to make ends meet, but reports
have shown that young people – young single mothers in particular, are
feeling the worst of austerity, and many are turning to prostitution in pursuit
of financial security.
Things are likely to get worse. In 2013-2014, a
lone parent would receive on average £46.80 a year less in benefits due to
governmental changes, while a couple with children would miss out on £52 a
year.
In 2014-2015, the projected figures are £260 less for
single parents and £156 less for couples with children. In short, single
parents – often the most financially vulnerable – are facing the harshest cuts
in benefits.
This has led to an increase in
prostitution, which has affected the industry’s economy; many sex workers are
reducing their charges (sometimes as much as 50 per cent) in order to beat
competition from other sex workers.
This contributes to a viscous circle; more
single parents – usually women, enter prostitution out of financial
desperation.
Due to the increase in sex workers, they need to engage in the
industry more to acquire the money they need. This in turn leads to a further
increase in active sex workers and a further devaluation of prostitution ad
infinitum.
One thing is clear –
tough policing and stricter legislation is not the solution. Ukraine’s capital
– Kyiv has struggled with high prostitution levels since it gained independence
in 1991, after the collapse of the Soviet Union. In 2005, it introduced more
rigorous legislation to try to combat the problem, to little effect.
The
country co-hosted the Euro 2012 football tournament with Poland and prepared
itself for the explosion in sex tourism. Kyiv alone has an estimated
50,000 sex workers, twice that of the whole of Holland, despite prostitution
being illegal in Ukraine and legal in Holland.
And some suspect that this
figure is even higher, with many young Ukrainian sex workers not wanting to
come forward due to fear of shaming and imprisonment.
The only way to tackle the exploitation of young
women is to tackle its root cause – poverty. To do otherwise would be like
treating a disease with tissues instead of medicine. This can be achieved
without reversing the entire austerity program (which no UK government is
realistically likely to do).
Firstly, the government could take up Ed
Miliband’s living wage proposals.
The introduction of this policy – providing tax incentives to companies who pay a living wage instead of a minimum wage to their employees (£7.45 per hour outside London and £8.55 in London, compared to the £6.19 minimum wage) would save the taxpayer £2.2bn, according to the thinktank Resolution Foundation.
It would also help to minimise in-work poverty, which would help single parents make ends meet without turning to prostitution.
The introduction of this policy – providing tax incentives to companies who pay a living wage instead of a minimum wage to their employees (£7.45 per hour outside London and £8.55 in London, compared to the £6.19 minimum wage) would save the taxpayer £2.2bn, according to the thinktank Resolution Foundation.
It would also help to minimise in-work poverty, which would help single parents make ends meet without turning to prostitution.
Another step would be to reintroduce the
Education Maintenance Allowance (EMA), as many of the hardest hit are young
people – this includes students.
The Women’s National Commission (a UK women’s
issues pressure group) claim the shocking statistic
that “50-75% of women in prostitution entered before they were 18” and that
many of these had been absent from education throughout this time.
Reconsidering the £9,000 tuition fee would also help to reduce the number of
students turning to
the sex industry out of fear of mountainous debts.
Of course, this article does not intend to argue
for or against sex work as a career choice. There is a persuasive case made by
libertarians and some sex-positive feminists that willing engagement in
prostitution is a matter of personal liberty for those involved and not the
concern of third parties.
Without divulging into a philosophical discussion
about such liberties, it is worth mentioning the statistic that in a study
on feminism and psychology, 92 per cent of sex workers said that they wanted to
leave prostitution “immediately”.
In a different study, 74 per cent of women cited “poverty”, paying “household expenses” and supporting children as a “primary motivator” for involvement in the industry.
In a different study, 74 per cent of women cited “poverty”, paying “household expenses” and supporting children as a “primary motivator” for involvement in the industry.
It should be clear by now that the vast majority of European sex workers are
exploited out of economic desperation and are not pursuing a career that they
necessarily consider legitimate, empowering or advisable – whatever one’s
position on such political theory.
“She was too ignorant as yet to know that the
chances of her finding work unaided were practically nil; but the next four
days gradually enlightened her”, read the pages of A Clergyman’s Daughter
– George Orwell’s understated and second novel.
The book is an exploration of
poverty in the 1930s, in which the protagonist, Dorothy, is swept away by the
cruel realities of homeless men and women, some of whom become sex workers for
mild reprieve. She is bailed out by a rich relative while being “on the very
verge of becoming one” – a prostitute.
Unfortunately – even in the 21st
century, not everybody is that lucky.
No comments:
Post a Comment