Tony Burke writes:
Earlier this year the United States’ Mike Froman, the
lead negotiator handling the Trans-Pacific Partnership Trade Deal (TPP) between
the USA and 11 Pacific Rim countries (Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan,
Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore and Vietnam) said he intended to
drive through the agreement this year as a precursor to pushing on with the
US/EU Trade Deal TTIP.
Well, against predictions, including some from myself, and fierce opposition from unions in the USA, they
have done what they said they would. The TPP deal, five years in the
making and covering 40 per cent of the world’s economy, has been agreed in
principle.
All that has to be done is for each country to ratify the deal – and
in the US for President Obama to get the deal through Congress. He will be able to do that using
the ‘fast track’ mechanism he got Congress to agree to this year, which allows
a straight ‘up and down’ vote on the deal with no line-by-line scrutiny.
Commenting on the deal, AFL-CIO
President Richard Trumka said:
“Now that the Trans-Pacific
Partnership deal has been finalised the Obama administration is telling anyone
who will listen that it has the strongest protections for workers of any trade
agreement in history. But nothing we know now about the TPP gives me
any confidence that workers will end up with the good jobs and protections they
deserve.
“There’s been a lot of talk about winners and losers in
various aspects of this deal. Spoiler alert: Corporations seem to win at every
turn at the expense of working people.”
Leo Gerard of the manufacturing
based United Steelworkers union warned that TPP may finally kill off US
manufacturing: “Our producers and workers
are under
siege from other nations’ massive overproduction, foreign currency
devaluation, our own lack of long-term infrastructure investment and the strong
dollar.”
Specific concerns about TPP
include currency manipulation, which US unions say has already caused thousands
of factories to close and millions of workers to lose their jobs. The ALF-CIO
says that the agreement without currency rules “turns a mighty river of off
shoring into a tsunami”.
The inclusion of corporate courts
(for investor-to-state dispute settlement) which gives multinational firms “who
use the U.S. as a flag of convenience” but produce little in the USA can now
invest in Australia, Japan and Malaysia, then sue over laws and regulations
they don’t like.
They will be able to collect billions from taxpayers to
compensate for lost profits.
US unions are also concerned
about the automotive sector. TPP will reduce US tariffs on cars and trucks
notably from Japan, which are sold in the US. Unions say cars may have a
Japanese name, but could be full of parts made in China.
Trumka said:
“I don’t know how the US
Trade Representative can look at any auto supply chain worker in the US (or
Canada or Mexico for that matter) and tell them with a straight face that TPP
is a good deal.”
The AFL-CIO says that while there
may be some small improvements to the labour clauses the rules will be
worthless without enforcement. “Until we see the actual text, we won’t know how
much these promises live up to their hype,” it said.
While the final text of the
agreement, which was announced this week, remains secret, leaks suggest that
there will be major concerns amongst trade unions and other civil society
groups.
Sharan Burrow, ITUC general
secretary, said:
“Trans-Pacific
Partnership trade deal is a recipe for corporate greed. Powerful
corporations were given an inside track in the secretive negotiations of the
TPP and their influence is clear in the outcome.
“Yet
again, governments have put the interests of finance and big business ahead of
ordinary people, with more financial deregulation, longer patents on
medicines at the expense of the public, and restrictions on digital freedoms.
Corporations will be able to sue governments under the infamous ISDS dispute
procedures; there are no direct remedies for workers.”
Paul Bastian of the Australian
Manufacturing Workers Union (AMWU) said:
“The TPP trade deal has been signed without any input
from the Australian public. Of particular concern is a provision under this
agreement that allows foreign companies to sue the Australian
government when we pass laws that hurt their profits.
“Also, we don’t know what
the deal says about overseas workers and labour movement, which would impact
jobs and potentially drive down wages and conditions, similar to The
China-Australia Free Trade Agreement.
“Despite the Australian
government having signed the agreement, it will be at least a month before
Australian businesses, unions, community groups and the population at large will
see the details for themselves.”
All this provides bleak news for
the unions and other groups who campaigning against the proposed EU-Canada Deal
(CETA) which has been initialled; the deal TTIP and the global investment deal
known as TiSA.
In the US Democratic presidential
front-runner Hillary Clinton has said she does not support TPP. But that may
not hold for long.
Clinton backed TPP when she was secretary of state during
Obama’s first term. Her main concern is on currency manipulation and
excessively high drug prices.
Unions and campaigners across the
EU, Canada and the USA will now need to mobilise more effectively than ever to
stop the TTIP, CETA and TiSA deals following TPP.
No comments:
Post a Comment