Jon Stone writes:
The overall cost of replacing
Britain’s Trident nuclear weapons system would be £167bn, double previous
credible estimates, according to new calculations based on official figures.
The Reuters news
agency reports that a replacement would cost nearly
double the proportion the defence budget as its predecessor.
The revelation comes
shortly after the anti-Trident SNP swept nearly every Scottish seat at the
Scottish general election and Labour elected anti-Trident leader Jeremy Corbyn
as Leader of the Opposition.
The figures, released by the Ministry of Defence following
parliamentary questions by Conservative MP Crispin Blunt, show ministers
believe the cost of four new submarines would be £25bn.
But the Government also says
maintenance of the system over its lifetime would cost six per cent of the
annual defence budget – which ministers have pledged to hold at two per cent of
GDP.
According to IMF GDP growth
forecasts for the UK, the total figure would therefore be £167bn, Reuters says.
“The successor Trident program is
going to consume more than double the proportion of the defence budget of its
predecessor,” Mr Blunt told the news agency.
“The price required, both from
the UK taxpayer and our conventional forces, is now too high to be rational or
sensible.”
The Royal United Services Institute estimated in 2013
that a new system would cost between £70bn and £80bn for its lifetime.
Ministers have previously
suggested the cost could be as low as £20bn, but this calculation is widely
believed to exclude various other factors.
The independent Trident
Commission said in 2014 that the cost of replacement would be around £100bn.
The new figures relate to the
lifetime cost of the system between 2028 and 2060.
A decision on whether to replace
the system is due next year. Labour has suggested that its MPs could be given a
free vote in Parliament, meaning many of its MPs will back it.
Parliamentary arithmetic means
the vote is likely to pass, barring a surprise last-minute rebellion by
Conservative MPs and a three-line whipped vote by Labour.
A spokesperson for the Ministry
of Defence said:
"At around six per cent of the annual defense
budget [yes, I fully expect that the MoD does now use American spellings], the in-service costs of the UK's national deterrent are affordable
and represent an investment in a capability which plays an important role in
ensuring the UK's national security."
No comments:
Post a Comment