The King was divorced from his first wife, so she would probably not have attended his Coronation, and she would certainly not have been crowned. The Queen is the most successful British politician alive, and the most successful in living memory. No one else comes close.
The arrest of protestors indicates that the monarchy does not in fact embody the things that its supporters say that it does. But its opponents are saying that those arrests are reminiscent of certain other countries, and those countries are republics. The arguments on both sides are rubbish, and the monarchy is what we have.
The country being cited most as the kind of place where demonstrators were bundled into the backs of police vans is Russia, and not without cause, although the same is just as true of Ukraine. Whoever fired whatever was fired at the Kremlin, this is not our fight. Beyond humanitarian relief, we are suicidally wrong to be playing any part in it, much less supplying one side with a weapon of mass destruction. What if our depleted uranium were to be fired at the Kremlin?
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is now broadly right about foreign policy, or at least better than any available alternative, but he was up to his neck in the Russiagate hoax. He may be the best this time, and able to open up the debate even though he will never be the nominee, but there is something pathetic, in both senses of the word, about those who are cheerleading for him out of dynastic loyalty while denouncing or deriding the monarchy and the Coronation.
Russia was one of a handful of countries with which British relations were so bad that they were not invited to send representation to the Coronation. Another was Afghanistan. What a successful 20-year war that was. All five British Prime Ministers who had waged it were in attendance, along with numerous others who had done so. Think on.
But when I tell you that there is going to be a hung Parliament, then you can take that to the bank. I spent the 2005 Parliament saying that it was psephologically impossible for the Heir to Blair's Conservative Party to win an overall majority. I predicted a hung Parliament on the day that the 2017 General Election was called, and I stuck to that, entirely alone, all the way up to the publication of the exit poll eight long weeks later. And on the day that Rishi Sunak became Prime Minister, I predicted that a General Election between him and Keir Starmer would result in a hung Parliament.
To strengthen families and communities by securing economic equality and international peace through the democratic political control of the means to those ends, including national and parliamentary sovereignty, we need to hold the balance of power. Owing nothing to either main party, we must be open to the better offer. There does, however, need to be a better offer. Not a lesser evil, which in any case the Labour Party is not.
The former PMs in attendance, all of whom were as mere ships passing the late Monarch in the night, demonstrated how the monarchy keeps politicians in their place. As did the magnificent crowds in attendance outside Buckingham Palace-no British PM could ever command such crowds and such national fervour. They wouldn’t dare even try because they know that’s only for Monarchs. That’s why the momarchy is so important.
ReplyDeletePMs have no real power in our country, they must seek permission to from the monarchy to even form an go Erm they and can be removed by Parliament as soon as they step out of line.
As, most recently, Boris was.
What a load of nonsense. In what place does the monarchy keep a Prime Minister? What, exactly, does it prevent him from doing? That business about crowds is beyond desperate.
DeleteThe knockdown argument for the monarchy is that the republican arguments are just as bad, so the case for change has not been made. Nothing more than that. But that is enough.
What I just said. The monarch prevents any PM occupying that special place in national hearts that we just saw today with the millions turning out and tuning in for the Coronation.
ReplyDeleteI’d cry with laughter to see Keir Starmer or Rishi Sunak ever try to get millions to “pledge allegiance” to them or turn out in force for their coronation.
The ephemeral nature of PMs by contrast with the Monarchy was confirmed by the sheer number of ex PMs sitting before the King today (the latest dethroned by Parliament a mere three years after winning an election). No PM in this country has any clout or real power as Parliament as they only have any authority at all if the King has granted them permission to form a government and they can then command a majority in Parliament and retain the confidence of the House.
What a splendid constitution we have!
No Prime Minister wants a special place in anyone's heart. You must never have met a politician.
DeleteOh but they do. Look at republics like the US or China and narcissists and demagogues like Donald Trump and Xi Jin Ping and you’ll see just how much politicians would love to be the focal point of the nation and the Head of State. Our Monarchy prevents them energy getting there.
ReplyDeleteExcept that, if that is what you mean, then it does no such thing.
DeleteOf course it does and that’s why we’ve never had demagogues or dictators in these islands. Unlike republics.
ReplyDeleteWhere does one even begin?
DeleteMussolini?
DeleteHe's just gone there.
DeleteThen please name the dictator or demagogue we’ve ever had in these islands.
ReplyDeleteIn our neighbouring republics they’ve had many just recently-from Marshall Petain to Hitler, from Mussolini to Ioannidis. Donald Trump is the gentler version. We’ve never had anything of the sort here, and that’s because we have a monarchy.
People like you don’t realise how fortunate you are to be British.
You have just made yourself look very, very, very silly. And you do not even know why.
DeleteI laughed.
DeleteI'm still laughing, but I really do have to go to bed.
Delete