Natural Family Planning is more effective than anything else, if it is taught properly. That is admitted even by the World Health Organisation, which is hardly a Vatican puppet.
NFP involves no poisoning of women in order to make them permanently available for the sexual gratification of men. It can only be practised by faithful couples. Its practitioners almost, if almost, never divorce.
In any case, the problem with the world is not that it has people in it. Still less that, specifically, it has working-class and non-white people in it, which is what those who advance that view always really mean.
That God is not mocked is now observable in the simple out-breeding within the Church of those who have dissented from this truth by those who have adhered to it, over the same decades as everything predicted in the foretelling that is always part of prophetic forth-telling has come to pass.
The phenomenal increase in promiscuity and its consequences. The invariable increase in abortions wherever there is contraception.
The horrendous medical side effects of contraceptive drugs. The enthusiastic approval of Natural Family Planning even by the WHO. The almost zero divorce rate among its (by no means only Catholic) practitioners.
And the growing recognition that the war against fertility is a war against the working classes, a war against non-white people, a war against the people of the developing world, and, above all, a war against women.
If it were not for the carping of our own dissidents, then we should already, in this generation, have made it unspeakable that women should poison themselves in order to be permanently available for the sexual gratification of men, or that the problem with the world was that it had proles and darkies in it, or that powerful chemicals to stop body parts from working properly were somehow medicines rather than the very reverse.
The anti-natal movement defines femaleness itself as a medicable condition, a misogyny comparable only to the definition of the unborn child as simultaneously insentient and part of the mother’s body.
Assisted by the realisation of what the West now has to do in order to compensate for its self-imposed demographic collapse, here’s to the next generation, in which our own troublemakers will die out or be institutionalised.
That God is not mocked is now observable in the simple out-breeding within the Church of those who have dissented from this truth by those who have adhered to it, over the same decades as everything predicted in the foretelling that is always part of prophetic forth-telling has come to pass.
The phenomenal increase in promiscuity and its consequences. The invariable increase in abortions wherever there is contraception.
The horrendous medical side effects of contraceptive drugs. The enthusiastic approval of Natural Family Planning even by the WHO. The almost zero divorce rate among its (by no means only Catholic) practitioners.
And the growing recognition that the war against fertility is a war against the working classes, a war against non-white people, a war against the people of the developing world, and, above all, a war against women.
If it were not for the carping of our own dissidents, then we should already, in this generation, have made it unspeakable that women should poison themselves in order to be permanently available for the sexual gratification of men, or that the problem with the world was that it had proles and darkies in it, or that powerful chemicals to stop body parts from working properly were somehow medicines rather than the very reverse.
The anti-natal movement defines femaleness itself as a medicable condition, a misogyny comparable only to the definition of the unborn child as simultaneously insentient and part of the mother’s body.
Assisted by the realisation of what the West now has to do in order to compensate for its self-imposed demographic collapse, here’s to the next generation, in which our own troublemakers will die out or be institutionalised.
You and certain other Catholic bloggers are nothing if not valiant in your efforts every time he gives one of his in-flight impromtus.
ReplyDeleteI don't see the need to be "valiant" here - or no more valiant than the usual Christian life!
ReplyDeleteThis time the Pope has simply said, in a soundbite, what Humanae Vitae said.
"Married love, therefore, requires of husband and wife the full awareness of their obligations in the matter of responsible parenthood..."
"With regard to physical, economic, psychological and social conditions, responsible parenthood is exercised by those who prudently and generously decide to have more children, and by those who, for serious reasons and with due respect to moral precepts, decide not to have additional children for either a certain or an indefinite period of time."
Note the word 'obligation' there, and the conditions which drive decisions of responsible parents.
Paul VI was no more in favour of "breeding like rabbits" that Pope Francis: and they both propose the variety of natural methods available to people to enable them to make and carry out their responsible decisions.