My impossibly young associate, Matt Turner, writes:
As an ardent supporter of Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership, I will
be the first to admit that the Labour Party is in disarray.
Latest opinion
polling indicate a catastrophic defeat in a hypothetical general election, and
despite fending off the threat of Ukip in Stoke, the loss of Copeland was a huge blow to all who wanted to
see the Corbyn project succeed.
Despite this, the vast majority
of Corbyn’s critics are yet to come up with any meaningful solutions to the
problems that we face – the few solutions that have been offered thus far are
simply not grounded in reality.
For instance, replacing him with another
left-leaning leader in an attempt to placate his critics in the media and the
Parliamentary Labour Party would only serve to embolden them.
The truth is that most of the so-called “moderates” in
the Labour Party know what the solution is – they just
don’t want to acknowledge it.
While it may be true that
Labour’s media strategy is in desperate need of improvement,
he is regularly being briefed against and undermined by many in his own party.
Lord Mandelson’s comments offer credence to the theory that the Labour right will not rest until
they regain control of the party, whatever the cost.
There is no denying that
there are problems with the leadership, but can they be solved when these
problems are being exacerbated by his critics in the party on a daily basis?
Voters will never look positively on a divided party.
The only way Corbyn can succeed, as The
Times’ Daniel Finkelstein has already noted, is by taking the
sharp left turn that he was elected to do.
The people also need to see an
authoritative and relentless streak that has so far been absent from his
leadership.
In short, Corbyn must fight back.
He needs to take control of the
party before he can take control of the country, otherwise he is nothing but a
sitting duck.
One of the ways this can be
achieved is through enabling the democratic right of CLPs to reselect and
deselect their parliamentary candidates, and organising in order to ensure that
young, up and coming, “fire in the belly” left wingers replace those who are actively
seeking to undermine the Labour Party under Jeremy Corbyn.
What would the implications of
adopting mandatory reselection be?
First and
foremost, a consensus on the left wing policies that have been resisted by
those in Labour who are still fawning over the politics and economics of old.
Moreover, the improved media strategy that many are demanding could emanate
from reselection.
For the first time during Corbyn’s tenure, Labour would have
a bold, unified and coherent party message that isn’t being contradicted every
other hour by figures from their own party.
The harsh reality is that the only
way this will be possible is by replacing the right wingers in the Labour
Party.
It is a prerequisite for the success of the Corbyn project.
Ironically,
he would be taking a leaf out of the Blairite playbook: Corbyn must be
tenacious, uncompromising and willing to play dirty.
He doesn’t need to quit,
he doesn’t need to make accommodating deals or be diplomatic.
He needs to
double down and fast, because anything other than that won’t be enough to solve
the Labour Party’s plight.
No need to comment: how could anyone doubt that this is what must be done?
ReplyDelete