Owen Jones writes:
“Austerity”
is a term so abstract that, during the televised leaders
debates at the last
general election, the most commonly Googled phrase in Britain was “what is
austerity?”
That was after five years of it.
Yes, workers suffered the longest
squeeze in their wages since the 19th century, but the fall in living standards
was somehow decoupled from the issue of cuts.
Government cuts pursued the
following strategy: to target people who were less likely to vote (such as
young people) and who preferably were held in low esteem by wider society (such
as benefit claimants); or where the consequences would not be felt for a long
time.
A case in point: the prison system.
Over the last few days, the
crisis enveloping Britain’s prison system stopped being a warning scribbled in
press releases. It become an actuality.
This weekend, up to 200 inmates rioted
in Bedford prison.
Our Victorian prison system –
which is more interested in locking
up mentally ill poor people than
rehabilitation and crime prevention – is overcrowded, under-staffed and
underresourced.
No one can say the warnings weren’t there.
While our prison
population doubled
in the space of two decades, last week the Prison Officers’
Association warned that falling staff numbers and cuts mean a“bloodbath
in prisons”, adding that “staff are absolutely on their knees, lost
all morale, all motivation”.
Opponents of cuts are frequently accused of
alarmism: we are now seeing how prophetic they were.
Some of the other consequences of
austerity are becoming visible, too.
A UN inquiry has condemned government cuts
for “systematic violations” of the rights
of disabled people, whether it be the bedroom tax or cuts to
disability benefits.
And today the Trussell
Trust reports that –
partly due to benefit sanctions and delays in social security payments – it is
set to deliver the biggest number of emergency food parcels ever.
After Britain
was battered by floods over the festive period last year, it was revealed how cuts
to flood defences had
put households at risk.
The danger is that – even as
these cuts hit – they will remain abstractions, headlines to goggle at and then
turn the page.
Those most badly affected can all too easily be ignored.
But the
failure to invest in a country’s future means we will all increasingly suffer
the consequences.
We are beginning to see what some of them are.
No comments:
Post a Comment