Chris Ames and Jamie Doward writes:
A cross-party group of MPs will make a fresh effort to
hold Tony Blair to
account for allegedly misleading parliament and the public over the Iraq war.
The move, which could see Blair
stripped of membership of the privy council, comes as the former prime minister
tries to re-enter the political fray, promising to champion the “politically
homeless” who are alienated from Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour and
the Brexit-promoting government of Theresa May.
The group, which includes MPs
from six parties, will put down a Commons motion on Monday calling for a
parliamentary committee to investigate the difference between what Blair said
publicly to the Chilcot inquiry into the war and privately, including
assurances to then US president George W Bush.
Senior Tory and Labour MPs are
also backing the move, which reflects widespread frustration that the
publication of the Chilcot report in July, after a seven-year inquiry, did not
result in any government action or accountability for Blair.
Salmond said some MPs believe
that senior civil servants were “preoccupied with preventing previous and
future prime ministers being held accountable”.
He said: “An example should be
set, not just of improving government but holding people to account.”
He pointed to last week’s Observer story revealing that, according
to documents released under the Freedom of Information Act, the inquiry was
designed by senior civil servants to “avoid blame” and reduce the risk that
individuals and the government could face legal proceedings.
Salmond also noted that documents
show many officials involved in planning the inquiry, including current cabinet
secretary Sir Jeremy Heywood, were involved in the events that led to war.
The new motion will be debated on
Wednesday in Commons time allotted to the SNP.
It calls on MPs to recognise
that the inquiry “provided substantial evidence of misleading information
presented by the then prime minister and others on the development of the then
government’s policy towards the invasion of Iraq as shown most clearly in the
contrast between private correspondence to the United States government and
public statements to parliament and people”.
The motion also asks the Commons
public administration and constitutional affairs committee to add to its
current inquiry into the lessons to be learned from Chilcot “a further specific
examination of this contrast in public and private policy and to report on what
further action is necessary to help prevent repetition of this disastrous
series of events”.
Salmond said the committee could
“recommend whatever action it pleases”, including that Blair be stripped of
membership of the privy council, which formally advises the sovereign and
exercises government and judicial functions.
This would be an unprecedented
move in respect of a former prime minister, but Williams said:
“If he continues
to be a member of the privy council while there is all this damning evidence
against him, what does that say about the institution?”
Williams told the Observer the process used was “scrupulously
fair” to Blair because he will have a chance to appear at the committee to
defend himself.
Lucas said: “The Chilcot report confirmed Tony Blair lied
to the public, parliament and his own cabinet in order to drag us into the Iraq
war.
“Privately, he said he would support Bush ‘whatever’ eight months before
the war – everyone else was told war could be avoided.
“Thousands of lives were lost
because he put that promise before all the evidence.
“Yet – despite the damning
evidence against him contained in the inquiry’s report – no action has been
taken against the former prime minister.”
A spokesman for Blair declined to
comment.
But, privately, his supporters say similar motions have been tabled
before without gaining significant traction among MPs.
They said that Chilcot
rejected allegations that Blair said one thing in public and another in
private.
Appearing before the Commons
liaison committee, Chilcot had said: “I absolve him [Blair] from a personal and
demonstrable decision to deceive parliament or the public – to state
falsehoods, knowing them to be false.”
No comments:
Post a Comment