Michael Calderbank writes:
I want to see the election of a Labour government: I
want to see an end to austerity, key services like our railways back into
public ownership, and the NHS protected from privatisation.
But Britain’s
membership of the European Union threatens the ability of a democratically elected
government to do any of this.
The EU we are being asked to
remain a member of is no longer the advocate of a “social Europe”.
Where the Europe of Jacques Delors appeared to offer some defence [like what, exactly?] against the Thatcherite onslaught witnessed here in Britain, today’s EU is a
key agent and driver of that neoliberalism.
Those real social gains which
remain in EU law from this period [like what, exactly?] are under threat.
It is no coincidence
that the big battalions of capital in Britain – the CBI, the Financial Times,
the City of London – all stand squarely in favour of staying “In”.
Take the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership
(TTIP) - a trade deal between the USA and EU – negotiated in secret, and with
frightening implications for the future of democracy.
It aims to
introduce a new ‘Investment Court System’, which allows multinational
corporations to bring legal actions in offshore courts against the governments
of nation states for loss of potential profits incurred where services are run
in the public sector rather than being privatised or outsourced.
This is
a thinly-veiled version of the Investor-State Dispute Settlements (ISDS)
already contained within other bi-lateral treaties signed by the EU.
This
led to energy company Vattenfall suing the German government for billions
of dollars over its decision to phase out nuclear power plants in the wake of
the Fukushima disaster in Japan.
If applied here, such a system
could well mean that, for example, our National Health Service is ruled
unlawful by foreign courts able to dictate to a British government that
healthcare must be run for private profit.
UKIP’s fear-mongering on
immigration might make some Labour supporters cling to the pro-EU side in
response.
But sadly politicians on both sides of the referendum question
will be appealing to popular prejudices.
Already, the cross party “Britain in
Europe” Group have stressed that the European Arrest Warrant is “necessary” to
kick out foreign rapists and murders from UK shores, again reinforcing
xenophobia.
Plus whilst socialists oppose racist immigration
controls, the European Union – at the same time as protecting free movement of
labour within EU states – has been pursuing a “Fortress Europe” policy when it
comes to policing external borders, leaving refugees to drown in the
sea.
It is totally false to portray all
advocates of withdrawal from the EU as “little Englanders”.
In reality,
we will need to develop closer solidarity ties amongst social movements across
Europe’s borders in order to fight off the imposition of austerity.
British withdrawal from the EU would deliver a significant blow for
accountability and popular sovereignty, not only in Britain but for all the
peoples of Europe.
No comments:
Post a Comment