Rob Sanders writes:
2015 was an amazing year for Jeremy Corbyn – but many
would agree that mistakes have inevitably been made.
One of the most glaring –
most public – was Corbyn’s decision to people his Shadow Cabinet with
appointments selected from across the spectrum of opinion in the Parliamentary
Labour Party.
Natural allies were kept waiting
in the wings while dissenting voices were invited upon the stage. They were
given the time and opportunity to come together in a chorus of unity.
This did
not happen.
No doubt the vast majority of
commentators believe this to be Corbyn’s fault. That he wasn’t enough of a
unifying figure or flexible enough to meet the different expectations of
cabinet members and the wider party.
But the Labour Party is a broad church and
the reality is that a contortionist would have failed to meet such
requirements. Still, it’s a mistake not to be repeated.
There are rumours of a New Year’s
Shadow Cabinet reshuffle and it would be easy to frame this in terms of revenge
and resolution.
While it is hard to imagine the Labour leader unaffected by the
betrayals of past weeks, it is more likely to be another piece of the puzzle
that is Corbyn the leader.
The cabinet appointments can be viewed less
political mistakes than failed experiments.
Experiments are performed to see what works and what
doesn’t. Corbyn received some predictable results but his willingness to
explore such possibilities is the mark of a man who wants to get it right.
They
are the actions of a future leader, not those of a man who merely wants to give
the appearance of being one.
As the months go by and a new
kind of politics emerges from the fug of political and press hostility, the
public are increasingly exposed to Corbyn’s positive qualities – in this case,
fairness.
It is a quality people on both sides of the political spectrum
admire.
It is present in the best of our everyday decision-makers: the
judicious magistrate; the fair but firm teacher; the impartial parent.
It
should be present in the words and deeds of our political leaders, but rarely
is.
Corbyn was fair in his
appointments to the Shadow Cabinet – even down to the pursuit of gender
equality. A number of those appointed, however, have not been fair in return.
Rather than commit to the debate and dialogue Corbyn so desperately wanted,
several briefed against him and made public their disagreements with the leader
who had empowered them.
Like naughty children at home or in the classroom, they
were given extra responsibilities and they abused them.
This was particularly apparent
during the Syria vote a few weeks ago, where Corbyn demonstrated his fairness
once again in offering Labour MPs a free vote.
In voting with the Tories and
rallying around an entirely contradictory argument – as presented in a speech
by the Shadow Foreign Secretary Hilary Benn – certain members of Corbyn’s
cabinet made it painfully clear how they were going to repay their leader’s
faith in them.
Chief among these was Benn
himself, the true architect of the vote’s success.
Benn is an opportunist who
pushed himself to the fore and whose actions have come closest to splitting the
party.
If the Parliamentary Labour Party was a ship, then Benn would be chief
mutineer – a would-be captain without the authority to lead beyond a very
public gun to his leader’s head.
This has been emphasised further by media
attention to Hilary Benn’s speech and a number of commentators heralding him as
a future leadership candidate, despite the fact that he has been an
unremarkable public servant up until now.
Benn and his supporters would have the Labour Party be
nothing more than a photocopy of a photocopy.
A party of diminishing returns,
unwilling to learn the lessons of the recent past and intent on further losing
its grasp on what it means to be an actual Opposition.
It might simply be an
inconvenient truth that these people find it easier to agree with a person like
David Cameron than a person like Jeremy Corbyn.
But, like the good teacher or
parent, come the New Year, Jeremy Corbyn will need to be both fair and firm.
He
has given divisive members of the Shadow Cabinet the opportunity to prove
themselves – and prove themselves they have.
They have proven themselves
unworthy of their position.
It is time for a reshuffle and to
give others the opportunity - whether they agree with their leader or not - to
contribute in a more constructive way.
As polls bear out, Corbyn increasingly
has a sense of which direction the wind is blowing. Like any captain, he
shouldn’t tolerate mutineers.
He needs a crew that are capable
of negotiating the coming storm and making the most of good weather.
No comments:
Post a Comment