Three-quarters of people affected by the bedroom tax say
they have had to cut back on food, an independent evaluation published by the
Department for Work and Pensions has found.
The research found that 46% said
they had cut back on heating, 33% on travel and 42% on leisure.
Among a control
group of tenants unaffected by the bedroom tax, far fewer – 56% – said they
were cutting back on food because of benefit changes.
The findings by the Cambridge
Centre for Housing and
Planning Research and Ipsos Mori were slipped out by the government on the last
day of parliament before the winter break, along with a deluge of more than 380
other documents.
Its study found landlords were
very concerned that some tenants were “in severe poverty and unable to pay the
shortfall”.
The report said 78% of claimants who were still affected by the
bedroom tax after two years of the policy were regularly running out of money
by the end of the week or month.
They tended to pay the rent by using up
savings, borrowing from family or friends or accruing debt.
It found that the effects of cutting back “had an impact
on some claimants’ health and emotional wellbeing, with the most vulnerable
reporting experiences of stress and worry”.
Claimants were able to use
savings and borrowings in the first year of the bedroom tax but by the time of
the second wave of qualitative research, in autumn 2014, claimants “who had
been using their savings for the first year had depleted these and so were
having to make greater cutbacks in their household budgets”.
The report found that only one in
nine claimants escaped the bedroom tax by moving to a different property, and
the vast majority of those affected were still affected nine months later.
Only 5% of those affected by the
policy had been successful in finding extra work, of which half said they were
then no longer affected by the bedroom tax.
Owen Smith, the shadow work and
pensions secretary, said it was beyond him how Iain Duncan Smith, the work and
pensions secretary, could “continue to stand by this vile policy”.
He said: “This damning
independent report, published by the DWP itself, shows how this brutal and
unfair policy deliberately drives people deeper and deeper in to poverty. It’s
shameful – especially in the run-up to Christmas - that 80% of people hit by
the bedroom tax regularly run out of money by the end of the week or month.
Alison Garnham, chief executive
of the Child Poverty Action Group, said: “The DWP’s own evaluation finds that
the bedroom tax is not only pushing families into hardship but it’s also
failing to free up more accommodation for families – the key argument ministers
used to justify this controversial policy.”
She also criticised the timing of the report’s
publication.
“This is a long and deep look at a hugely controversial policy –
it really should not have been released just as MPs rise for Christmas,” she
said.
A government spokeswoman said:
“It is wrong that under the previous system taxpayers had to subsidise benefit
claimants to live in houses that are larger than they require. Removing the
spare room subsidy has restored fairness to the system for claimants as well as
the taxpayer, and the numbers subject to a reduction are falling.
“We know that there are cases
where people may need extra support whilst they transition to our reforms –
that’s why we have given councils £500m of funding to provide discretionary
payments to those that need them, with a further £800m to be provided over the
course of this parliament.”
No comments:
Post a Comment