Here:
There was a large march and rally in defence of
the NHS in Manchester yesterday – yet the BBC’s coverage largely glossed over
it, only including it in coverage of Tory conference. Andy Burnham, who was one
of the speakers at yesterday’s rally, has written to Lord Patten at the BBC to
ask why the BBC neglected to cover the event, when other news networks did in
far more detail. Here’s the letter:
———–
Dear Lord Patten
BBC coverage of NHS march and rally in
Manchester
Yesterday, Manchester witnessed one of the
largest demonstrations in its long political history as people from a range of
backgrounds and from all over the UK converged to raise concern about this
Government’s changes to the NHS.
According to official estimates from Greater
Manchester Police, around 50,000 people took part. GMP said it was one of
the largest protests they had ever policed and it was clearly one of the
largest political demonstrations held outside London for many a year.
I attended the event and was proud to walk
alongside doctors, nurses and other front-line NHS staff from all parts of
the country who had given up their Sunday in the hope of making their voice
heard. From my observation, NHS staff made up a significant proportion of the
large crowd.
It was therefore a real surprise to me to return
home to find what I consider only cursory coverage of the event on BBC
news bulletins. As far I could see, there was no specific coverage and
it was only mentioned in the wider context of Conservative Party
Conference. There was no explanation as to why people were there in such large
numbers nor direct interviews with participants to find out what had prompted
them to travel so far on a Sunday.
By any reckoning, this was a major national
protest and it seems to me that the BBC’s coverage did not reflect
this. Indeed, other major news channels seemed to reach a different
editorial judgement, covering the story in more depth and interviewing
participants.
My purpose in writing to you is not, at this
stage, to make a formal complaint but rather to request that the Trust conduct
a review of the extent and quality of the BBC coverage and to provide me with a
considered opinion as to whether you consider it to have been adequate given
the scale and social significance of the event. In particular, I would be
grateful to know how many journalists and cameras were sent by the BBC to
provide direct coverage of the event.
Since yesterday, the concern that many people
have expressed on social media outlets is that the perceived lack of adequate
coverage of yesterday’s events follows a pattern. As I am sure you are aware,
there have been many complaints of the BBC’s perceived failure adequately
to cover the changes to the NHS – in particular, the privatisation of services
– in both the run-up to, and aftermath of, the Health & Social Care Act
2012. I don’t know whether the Trust has received complaints about this matter,
and had the opportunity to investigate it, but either way it would be helpful
to hear your views on this wider context as part of your response.
Thank you for your consideration of this request
and I look forward to your response.
Best wishes
RT HON ANDY BURNHAM MP
Patten is not only a former Chairman of the Conservative Party who continues to receive that Whip in the House of Lords, but also an employee of at least one company with interests in the privatisation of England's NHS.
Patten is not only a former Chairman of the Conservative Party who continues to receive that Whip in the House of Lords, but also an employee of at least one company with interests in the privatisation of England's NHS.
No comments:
Post a Comment