Tuesday, 14 June 2022
Until The Expiry
If there is nothing wrong with Rwanda, then how is the prospect of being sent there supposed to be a deterrent? And if you are too reactionary even for the European Court of Human Rights, then you really are beyond the Pale.
Nothing that was largely written by David Maxwell Fyfe ever did have anything to do with the Left. Not the European Union into which he so castigated Anthony Eden for not having taken Britain at the start. And not the European Convention on Human Rights, either. There was a reason why its incorporation into British domestic law was never attempted by any Labour Government until that of Tony Blair.
It duly proved useless as civil liberties were shredded; it was the dear old House of Commons that stopped the detention of people for 90 days without charge. And it duly proved useless as the poor, the sick and the disabled were persecuted on a scale and with a venom that had not been seen since before the War, if ever. That persecution continued into and as the age of austerity. Against austerity, human rights legislation has been of only the most occasional use, if any. That has always been the intention.
In May 1948, the pompously self-styled Congress of Europe assembled in the Hall of Knights, in The Hague. Addressing that assembly, Winston Churchill called it "the Voice of Europe". But in fact it was mostly made up of politicians who had recently been defeated at the polls, of the representatives of Royal and Noble Houses that had fairly recently been dispossessed at least in political terms, of the likes of Churchill who fell into both categories, and of people whose lives' work was trying to delude themselves that so did they.
In the name of the order that had held sway for a century between the defeat of Napoleon and the First World War, their aim was very explicitly to check the Social Democracy that was sweeping Western Europe at the time. The material that they produced had that intention, and it has had that effect. Lo and behold, Blair had it written into British domestic law.
Tonight, Boris Johnson and Priti Patel have fallen foul even of that. Meanwhile, all that the Official Opposition can find to say is that this policy is too expensive. It has fallen to Prince Charles and to the Lords Spiritual to say that it is morally wrong. If anything, the Labour Party is even worse on this than the Government is.