Peter Hitchens writes:
Do you really think the Russian
deep state couldn’t have murdered Alexander Litvinenko secretly, in such a way
that we could never have traced it to them?
The oddest
thing about this case is the use of a violently radioactive, totally traceable
poison, and the conduct of the two alleged killers, whose revolting deed was
mismanaged in a way that would be comic if a man had not died as a result.
Meanwhile, the
two suspects prance about in public (I once met a smirking Andrei Lugovoi in
Moscow, as he strolled through an expensive hotel).
This is surely
a gesture of angry contempt, against which Moscow knows we are more or
less powerless to react effectively.
We might wonder why.
Maybe it has
something to do with our courts refusing to extradite people such as the
Chechen leader Akhmed Zakayev, regarded in Moscow as terrorists, and then
giving them political asylum.
Whether this
decision was right or wrong (and I don’t know enough to say), you can see why
it might annoy them.
Despite being an increasingly insignificant country, we
have got ourselves involved with some big and nasty people in a rather rough
neighbourhood.
I hope it’s worth it.
Lindsay thinks we shouldn't allow any enemies of Putin to stay here in case it upsets him. After all, he might poison them.
ReplyDeleteWe have quite enough problem people of our own, without importing anybody else's.
DeleteNotice how almost nothing is being don about this daft Report. Nor will it be.
The people, not Hitchens but a lot of others, who are itchiest to bomb Russia or extradite Putin or something are normally against immigration and asylum. Why is Litvinenko different?
ReplyDelete