George Osborne's father-in-law's intervention will not have cost the Coalition parties anything here.
They already held all of two seats each, out of 29 in total. And they were going to lose one each, anyway.
Leaving one each. Both of them in rural Northumberland, which is far from desolate.
Whereas the Coalition parties, of course, are.
I presume you agree with fracking (and not the with the mad environmentalist lobby) in alignment with your support for an independent British energy source.
ReplyDeleteOh, I'm open to the idea, although I'm disinclined to believe the hype, and, not only in this case, I am aghast at how Tory scepticism has been replaced by and with hysteria. Nuclear power and coal: now, we know about them for a fact.
ReplyDeleteIts' thought to be cleaner than coal and (obviously) far safer than nuclear power.
ReplyDeleteIts benefits may be in doubt, but I'm disinclined to support the same tree-huggers whose anti-British "environmentalism" makes us dependent on useless windmills and foreign states.
And, unfortunately, you seem to abandon your proper "Tory scepticism" in certain other areas (particularly when it came to you naively supporting the BBC, Hacked Off and Nick Clegg's blatantly obvious propaganda campaign to use phone hacking as an excuse to shackle investigative journalism...notice how they ignored the true SOCA "phone hacking scandal" now emerging, involving 102 corporations who have escaped any punishment or exposure).
Notice the difference between the way the BBC reported the NOTW phone-hacking and the real phone-hacking scandal, covered up by our British KGB (or "Serious Organised Crime Agency").
It was never the phone hacking they cared about, you see.
It was their desire to shackle our free press.
And they must be stopped.
Drivel.
ReplyDeleteSOCA = British KGB? Good Lord. Some people really should be banned from a keyboard.
ReplyDelete