Here:
Just 13% of voters agree that the August Bank
Holiday should be renamed “Margaret Thatcher Day”,
a new poll from Lord Ashcroft has found. The proposal was among the ideas proposed in the
“Alternative Queen’s Speech” put forward by a number of Conservative backbench
MPs last month.
Despite being promoted as proper conservative
policies designed to win back disillusioned voters, Lord Ashcroft concludes
that many of the proposals have little support and score highly on what he
called the ‘Meh Index’ – the proportion who have no opinion on the idea one way
or the other.
The findings include:
· Just 13% agree that the August Bank Holiday
should be renamed “Margaret Thatcher Day”, with two thirds opposed.
Conservative voters disagree with the idea by a 23-point margin.
· Only around a quarter of voters support
allowing employees to opt out of the minimum wage, scrapping the Department of
Energy & Climate Change, and privatising the BBC.
· Many of the proposed ideas score highly on Lord
Ashcroft’s ‘Meh Index’: 48% of voters have no opinion either way on removing
some UK waters from the Common Fisheries Policy and abolishing the office of
Deputy Prime Minister; 45% have no view on requiring developers to hand over
residential roads to local authorities.
However, some proposals were received more
positively, for example:
· 90% support ensuring that offenders committing
the same offence for the second or third time serve a longer sentence than they
did for their original conviction; 87% approve of deporting foreigners found
guilty of a criminal offence; 80% agreed that people wishing to claim asylum in
the UK must do so within a set time after their arrival.
Furthermore, voters who were told that the ideas
had been proposed by Conservative MPs registered lower levels of support for
the policies than those voters simply told that they were ideas that some
people had suggested ought to become law.
Leading john b to comment:
Recidivism is already a substantial aggravating factor in sentencing, and sentencing in general is getting more rather than less severe. So it would be incredibly rare for a recividist to get a lower sentence for the same offence. The only cases where the new measure would be relevant would be for people who (eg) stole a million quid on their first offence and shoplifted a chocolate bar on their second.
Leading john b to comment:
Recidivism is already a substantial aggravating factor in sentencing, and sentencing in general is getting more rather than less severe. So it would be incredibly rare for a recividist to get a lower sentence for the same offence. The only cases where the new measure would be relevant would be for people who (eg) stole a million quid on their first offence and shoplifted a chocolate bar on their second.
Foreign criminals who are jailed are deported as
a matter of course unless the Home Secretary decides it’s an exceptional case –
even when they have ILTR, have a partner and children who are UK citizens, and
have been jailed for minor offences. Trenton Oldfield and Jimmy Mubenga are
obvious examples just from the last two weeks’ news. The only cases that would
be covered by this one would be foreigners with ILTR and UK family ties, caught
for minor offences that doesn’t even carry jail terms.
Set time for refugee claims is also already
applied in practice: illegal entry without an immediate claim for asylum, and
making an asylum application in a situation where the alternative would be
removal, are both automatic criteria for fast-track detention and deportation.
In other words, the only Tory Right suggested
policies which are popular are the ones which already happen, but which people
wrongly believe don’t happen because of the crap they read in the media and are
shovelled by politicians.
No comments:
Post a Comment