Friday, 19 July 2013

A Rock of Democratic Stability

Rejoicing in the defeat of the misnamed right-wing Social Democrats, who are vaguely amenable to a deal with Spain, by the Gibraltar Socialist Labour Party, which was founded by the Transport and General Workers' Union (now Unite) in order to secure for the British workers of Gibraltar the same pay and conditions enjoyed by other British workers, which grew out of the previous Integration with Britain Party, and which remains as true as ever to its own slogan of "Give Spain No Hope" that won it the 1992 Election with 72 per cent of the vote but which was not at all what the Major Government wanted to hear, David Eade writes:

A very notable event happened on the fourth of July. Apart from being Independence Day in the USA, it was also the date of a by-election in Gibraltar. The election was free and fair, the candidates and their parties behaved within the norms of electoral law – and here’s the big shock, the winning party, the GSLP, happened to be the socialist party in a coalition Government and increased its popularity with the voters.

Whilst in Old Europe we take free and fair elections for granted, such a situation does not even hold true within the entire EU. Likewise whilst the majority of Old Europe sees its political parties act within the electoral norms, there are other countries in the EU where vote rigging and buying are the norms instead. And here’s the real shock: Gibraltar has a governing party entering mid-term which is more popular now with voters than when it was elected. That situation is very unique in Europe.

So whilst democracy is seemingly safe in Gibraltar, there are worrying signs elsewhere that suggest some countries may be becoming ungovernable or are indeed already there.

Let us look at Egypt, for example. President Mohammed Morsi has been deposed from power in a ‘peaceful’ army coup, ‘peaceful’ being a relative term here. There may be many reasons why Morsi was not the man for the job or his party not the one to unite Egypt. However, the fact is he was elected to the post of president in the country’s first fair and free elections in our life time. The people of Egypt had every right to peacefully protest against his actions and policies but did the army have the right to remove him from power? If we believe in democracy surely that is the job of the electorate at the next election.

In Bulgaria, the popularist GERB government resigned in February after violent street protests over a hike in electricity prices, which few could afford, and the economic state of the EU’s poorest country. In the May general election GERB, which has links to organised crime and is notorious for vote rigging, was returned as the largest party but its share of the vote collapsed.

It could not govern on its own so the socialist BSP, which came second, joined a coalition to keep GERB out. However, to do so it had to make a pact with the Movement for Rights and Freedoms (MRF) and the nationalist party ATAKA to rule. ATAKA is anti Turkish and anti Roma whilst the MRF speaks for both groups. The MRF also has a history of vote rigging.

Some initial mistakes by the new prime minister brought the same protestors out onto the streets again and even the president has now suggested that new elections will have to be called. If so, where does Bulgaria go from here? Do the protestors want GERB back? Certainly not. Do they want a socialist government? Possibly but even the BSP has in the past had links with its communist roots, oligarchs and criminals. Do they want the MRF or ATAKA to govern? Hardly. So how do you run a country when the rejected options are the most voted for parties even if vote rigging and buying is rife? The current anti-GERB coalition is far from perfect but it is realpolitik, like it or not.

In Spain, Transparency International reports that 86 per cent of Spaniards believe their politicians are corrupt as Rajoy wobbles under the sleaze accusations of the Bárcenas scandal. The political and summer heat is getting much hotter for the Partido Popular Prime Minister.

In a country where over 26 per cent of people are jobless, where if you are young you a more likely to be on the dole than in work, where thousands have lost their homes and are still deep in debt, where the economic crisis stumbles from bad to worse, for how long are people going to stand idly by whilst they are ruled by crooks. My guess is not long at all and social upheaval will soon be upon Spain as it is in Turkey and has been in Greece.

Italy and Portugal could well be next.

Gibraltar was already remarkable in that Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus and people of other religions and none live side by side in perfect harmony in a world where that is far from the norm.

In addition to that distinction, Gibraltarians can get on with their lives safe in the knowledge they live in a stable democracy, as solid as their Rock.

However, there are warnings for Gibraltar’s politicians and voters in what is happening around the world. The warning to its politicians is that voters will not accept governments that govern for themselves and not the people. The warning to its voters is to treasure the open, free and fair democracy they enjoy and protect it with all their might – because it is rarer and more fragile than they may think.

12 comments:

  1. ""was not at all what the Major Government wanted to hear"

    Gibraltar has only ever been secure under a Tory Government.

    The last time Labour were in power, it tried to give it away behind the backs of its people-until those people (spurred by the Right-wing British press) held a spontaneous referendum to pull the rug out from under Labour.


    "Shared sovereignty" indeed!

    The people of Gibraltar remember which treacherous party that was.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Indeed-Gibraltar remains solidly British despite the treacherous best efforts of the Labour Party to sell it off in 2002, so as to curry favour with its beloved EU.

    Their 2002 referendum was a brilliant piece of PR which, backed by the British right-wing press, saved them from Spain.

    Gibraltarians know better than most that Left-wing British Governments mean betrayal and surrender to their enemies.

    Just like Attlee's Government scuttled from our imperial responsibilities and created the problems we now see in Iraq, Afghanistan, India and Pakistan.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You are just making stuff up now.

    Major was openly desperate to be rid of Gibraltar, and furious at the victory of the very left-wing, strongly trade union-based GSLP, which put the kibosh on that one.

    You are hopelessly out of your depth.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "Whilst in Old Europe we take free and fair elections for granted, such a situation does not even hold true within the entire EU. Likewise whilst the majority of Old Europe sees its political parties act within the electoral norms."

    "The warning to its politicians is that voters will not accept governments that govern for themselves and not the people. The warning to its voters is to treasure the open, free and fair democracy they enjoy and protect it with all their might – because it is rarer and more fragile than they may think."

    What is the point in having free and fair elections when the politicians do NOT act within the electoral norms. This prime minister, aided and abetted by his deputy Clegg and the compliant leader of the supposed opposition has not acted within the electoral norms in pushing through a bill that NONE of them had in a manifesto and was never put before the people. In not having any mandate from the people, and rejecting out of hand numerous attempts to provide safeguards, this despicable trio were obviously governing for themselves.
    How can voters treasure the open, free and fair democracy they enjoy and protect it with all their might, when the politicians they elect to represent them arrogantly and publicly reject such principles.
    The recent example of the 'gay marriage' legislation is the best example I can give. When a government, aided and abetted by unprincipled and opportunistic fellow travellers, passes a law on a matter that was in no party's manifesto, it should be rejected out of hand by the monarch acting on behalf of the people, and such legislation should also be subject to a judicial review in the courts as having no electoral validity. Old Europe? New Europe? It makes no difference when a country is led by a scoundrel, and aided by scoundrels.

    ReplyDelete
  5. But it was Labour who actually tried to get rid of Gibraltar when it held "shared sovereignty" negotiations, until the people of Gibraltar launched a coup to save themselves from Labour with a referendum.

    Jack Straw and Tony Blair hilariously condemned the referendum as a stunt.

    But Blair was only continuing in the long Labour tradition of scuttle from Empire- which began with Clement Atlee.

    Blair was, in a way, a Labour traditionalist.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Illiterate.

    If we must, let's start with the fact that no African country ever became independent of Britain under a Labour Government. Not one.

    Every British imperial loss in Africa was made by the Tories. Every single one.

    For example.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Who mentioned an African country?

    Attlee scuttled from everywhere else-the modern three-way civil war in Iraq between Kurd, Shia and Sunni, the horrendous four-way division of Kurdistan and the ongoing strife between India and Pakistan all originate from Labour and the British Left's hasty scuttles from our imperial responsibilities.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It was an example (well, rather a lot of examples, actually), and you cannot answer it.

    There was not a Labour Government when the Ottoman Empire was carved up, nor at the time of the Balfour Declaration.

    British accession to the demand for Pakistan was Churchill's idea: "Keep a bit of India." Britain had long favoured the Muslims (most of whom did not want Pakistan, but that is another story), and Britain continued to favour Pakistan over India long after independence.

    You are out of your depth.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Out of my depth?

    I rather think not-it was Labour who scuttled from Palestine, India and modern-day Iraq and carved up Kurdistan, in addition to fleeing Burma in disgrace.

    These are simple historical facts which you can't deal with.

    Churchill was, of course, a floor-crossing Liberal, not a Tory.

    The Tories opposed all of Attlee's scuttles-even Churchill initially wanted to keep India and vowed, upon returning to office "I will not preside over a dismemberment" before sending troops to put down revolts in Kenya and Malaya.

    And I do not defend the atrocities which the British perpetrated in Kenya.

    We created the worst British concentration camps since the Boer War in that place-(read Caroline Elkington's harrowing book on it).



    ReplyDelete
  10. All over the place.

    Good Lord, preserve us from well-meaning third rate undergraduates.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Don't talk about your blog like that.

    Although I agree its author is well-meaning, in his slightly unhinged way.

    He's also unemployed at the tender age of 35.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I wish that I were unemployed, I might get some work done.

    ReplyDelete