Monday 20 June 2011

Father, Dear Father

Better late than never, a post for Fathers’ Day.

Our society is crying out for a legal presumption of equal parenting. For the restoration of the tax allowance for fathers for so long as Child Benefit was being paid to mothers. For the restoration of the requirement that providers of fertility treatment take account of the child’s need for a father. For repeal of the ludicrous provision for two women to be listed as a child’s parents on a birth certificate, although even that is excelled by the provision for two men to be so listed. And for paternity leave to be made available at any time until the child was 18 or left school.

That last, in particular, would reassert paternal authority, and thus require paternal responsibility, at key points in childhood and adolescence. That authority and responsibility require an economic basis such as only the State can ever guarantee, and such as only the State can very often deliver. And that basis is high-wage, high-skilled, high-status employment. All aspects of public policy must take account of this urgent social and cultural need. Not least, that includes energy policy: the energy sources to be preferred by the State are those providing the high-wage, high-skilled, high-status jobs that secure the economic basis of paternal authority in the family and in the wider community. So, nuclear power. And coal, not dole.

And it includes foreign policy, in no small part because those sent to war tend to come from working-class backgrounds, where starting to have children often still happens earlier than has lately become the norm. Think of those very young men whom we see going off or coming home, hugging and kissing their tiny children. Yet our society urgently needs to re-emphasise the importance of fatherhood. That authority cannot be affirmed while fathers are torn away from their children and harvested in wars.

You can believe in fatherhood, or you can support wars under certainly most and possibly all circumstances, the latter especially in practice today even if not necessarily in the past or in principle. You cannot do both. Which is the conservative position? Which makes present in the world the Fatherhood of God proclaimed by Jesus Christ, the fundamental point of reference for all three of our political traditions?

16 comments:

  1. Great news about your books. When are they published and where can we order them?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Right now, your guess is as good as mine. I mean, I know that they are happening; as much as anything else, the publishers have done too much work on them to back out now. I just wish that they would get on with it. Still, typical first-time author, I expect. Now, on topic, please.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Good that they're being published. Who are the publishers?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I've reached the stage where I no longer discuss the books until they actually appear, when this blog's readers will be the first to know. So again I say, on topic, please.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Rumor has it one of them will be published here in the States before it is published in the UK. Since it contains the material in this post among a great many other things, I do not see how that is off topic. To the contrary, the wise words of this post are going to be published on both sides of the Atlantic, to enormous acclaim. I did not know that you had one or more other books. Also on theology? Either way, I greatly look forward to them as many people do. God bless you.

    ReplyDelete
  6. No, one that could exactly be called theology is not the one we are waiting for on the London think-tank circuit that David would kill me for letting you know he had any links to.

    Everything by David is somehow theological but his other book, if there are not even more in the pipe line, seems to mirror the American one. I expect the American one is about how the conservative and liberal wings of the Catholic church are both half right and half wrong.

    David has similar thoughts on the Tory right and the Labour left. Us regulars here knew that already.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I was going to castigate the great man for letting an off-topic comment up when he'd said he wouldn't. But if his other book, or one of them, is as Lucky Jim says then it will also be typified by this post. A great man, a very great man indeed. If you don't believe me, look at his critics.

    ReplyDelete
  8. If the rumours about America are true, you don't mess about with anyone below the very, very top. Father, Dear Father, indeed. I wish I had your self-belief. I wish I was entitled to it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. They are probably searching Amazon as I write although you might not believe me because you have always had a tendency to think that stupid or evil people were not as stupid or evil as they appeared. But I'm serious. Bloody Amazon. Undergraduate amateurs. Hasn't your tutoring had any elevating effect on them or are they so much of that generation that they are beyond help?

    ReplyDelete
  10. The former in some cases, but, I fear, the latter in others. My consolation is that only a tiny number of my tutees (well, one really) has ever taken against me, and that, though I say so myself, I seem to inspire a quite ferocious loyalty in the rest.

    Those in the second category may be "undergradute amateurs", but one can grow and be trained out of that. In the first are one or more amateur undergraduates, only at university at all in the absence of the grammar schools. I need hardly tell you that such people are also characteristically fond of Wikipedia.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I think you should give even someone educated that far beyond their intelligence a bit more credit than to suggest that they go looking for a forthcoming book on Amazon and if they can't find it decide it doesn't exist. Maybe they should never have been let into a university but they have spent several years at one and, hell, they must have learned *something*.

    Are we talking about your stellar lineup of peers and so on already signed up to write for your edited book, are we talking about the one entirely by you that already has a high powered collection of essays in response being put together, or are we talking about something else? Whatever, I hope they all contain the phenomenally important insights contained in this post and many previous ones on the same theme.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Umpteenth Time Author20 June 2011 at 21:57

    Once one of them is out, all the others will be in rapid succession. Cheer up, old man. We've all been there.

    ReplyDelete
  13. @19:23, you have clearly never met the only ever traitor in the Lindsay fold.

    He has been at university for longer than three years but he has learned nothing worth nothing. Except not to f**k with David Lindsay, but there is no need to go into that.

    If his silly little organ had the slightest potency, he would be unable to function as a member of college after trying to stick the knife into everybody's favourite uncle. That is probably why he never comes in.

    But he does not realise that his silly little organ is a flop, nobody cared what he did with it or even noticed very much. Or does he never come in because he does realise that?

    Sorry, off-topic.

    ReplyDelete
  14. If Mr Lindsay says it, it is true. Eight words to live by. Trust that the book launches will be held in college. We all know who will not be invited.

    ReplyDelete
  15. WTF have any of these comments got to do with Young Maister Lindsay's half decent, accent on the "half" here, original post? Dissapointing...

    Just a thoct you understand but you widnae be sock puppeting Young Maister?

    Kennybhoy

    ReplyDelete
  16. WTF, indeed?

    Oh, no, I'm as frustrated as anyone that this thread has been hijacked, even if some of the unpublishable comments have been very, very funny. A comment on the original post would be more than welcome.

    ReplyDelete