Saturday 11 June 2011

Not Angels, But Anglicans

The Archbishop of Canterbury is a Privy Counsellor and a Member of Parliament, so if he cannot speak on political matters, then who can? But is he the leader of the 70-million-strong Anglican Communion? That is a piece of English post-imperial wishful thinking, quite apart from the fact that that huge figure is only attained by including everyone who was baptised in the Church of England.

It is a strange feature of the Church of England that neither of its Archbishops is currently an Englishman, nor even, I believe it is correct to say, a native speaker of English, although all Welsh-speakers in Wales rather than in Patagonia might as well be. Both Dr Williams and Dr Sentamu are really figures of the Anglican Communion rather than of the Church of England. And the Anglican Communion was overwhelmingly created by people who did not like the Church of England, or very often the English in general.

The Church of Ireland has provided two Presidents of the Irish Republic, including the ardently Irish-speaking first, both in the days when that Republic’s Constitution still laid claim to “the whole island of Ireland”. James Ussher wrote to his Canterbury counterpart as “Brother Primate” and even “Brother Patriarch”; their equality was undoubted on either side. (Ussher’s calculations of the date of creation are by far the least interesting thing about him, and a full biography was quite recently published by Professor Alan Ford of Nottingham, who previously had the questionable pleasure of lecturing me at Durham on the Reformation.) Anglicans and not Presbyterians may have founded the Orange Order and the Ulster Unionist Party, but the very many who are still in them (and very many are) are fully part of the “Ulster British” culture that includes never cheering for England against anyone, and supporting the Union strictly as a means of defending and of paying for what is really the State of Ulster.

The Governing Body of the Church in Wales includes Lord Elis-Thomas, the first person ever elected to the House of Commons specifically as a Welsh Nationalist before becoming the first ever such Peer, although the Leader of Plaid Cymru actively encourages his members to apply. Most people assume that R S Thomas was a Chapel minister. He was not.

The Episcopal Church in the United States is a product of the American Revolution, deriving its name and orders from the Episcopal Church in Scotland, which then had a recent history of armed insurrection against the Hanoverian monarchy, and which remains heavily concentrated in the area where the SNP is also strongest. Especially in the nineteenth century, American Episcopalians have provided several extremely anti-British Presidents of the United States.

Most of the rest of the Anglican Communion’s founding fathers were either hardline Anglo-Catholics or hardline Evangelicals, and had deliberately gone to the ends of the earth, by no means only within the British Empire, in order to escape from the Church of England and start again from scratch, keeping in touch for purposes of spiritual and material support only with parishes whose clergy were, and are, seldom or never made bishops in England. In stark contrast to the Catholic Church in Zimbabwe, the Anglican Church there is closely allied to Robert Mugabe. There were plenty of Anglican clergymen and laymen in the Mau Mau.

And so on, and on, and on.

It is no wonder that there is such bafflement at the smug English oligarchic suggestion that Anglican identity consists in unity with whoever some Muslim or atheist Prime Minister of the United Kingdom chooses to give a seat in the British Parliament. It is not so much that most Anglicans have, say, moved away from that sort of thinking. It is that they had never, ever heard of it in the first place.

3 comments:

  1. Perhaps you can answer this. If High Church is associated with Anglo-Catholics and Low Church with Evangelics then what do you call traditional Book of Common Prayer King James Bible Anglicans? They're not Anglo-Catholics (they tend to identify as Protestants and aren't fans of Catholic ritual) but nor do they go in for frankly weird tambourine bashing "modern" evangelical ceremonies. In fact they were traditionally the vast majority of Anglicans so it's weird that there's no common term to refer to them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh, there are several. Central. Middle of the Road, &c. It must be said that not many of them use the BCP and KJV these days, but then until the Sixties, and even later, no one was more vigorous in those causes than the Evangelical wing.

    Central Churchmanship is usually associated with theological liberalism, but scratch below the surface and that is far more a feature of the clergy than of the laity. Similarly, many advanced ritualists are really very liberal indeed, especially on homosexuality.

    And the Evangelicals (who never call themselves Low, whereas High people do call themselves High) are now following the once-mighty Nonconformists down the road to oblivion that is merely baptising the presuppositions of the “middle middle classes”. They are not the only ones...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Interesting, thanks.

    ReplyDelete