It has been a long time coming, but Rome is finally about to act against the doctrinal, moral and numerical collapse of the Religious Life for women in the United States, and by extension elsewhere as well.
Take the trick employed by numerous American and other dioceses to weed out potential orthodox candidates for the Priesthood, of using some nun with a certificate in this or that to trap them into expressing support for the Church’s Teaching that ordination can be validly received by male persons only, leading Sister to file a report stating “psychological unsuitability” or whatever.
Funnily enough, this never seems to have weeded out a pederast. Being as child-hating (and especially boy-hating) as they are man-hating, these dis-habited radical feminists of the old school have packed seminaries, and thus presbyteries, with “ephebophiles”. Once the wickedness had done its work, they could, did and do trumpet the “proving” of their “point” that they were the ones who should have been made priests, and of course bishops, in the first place. Too bad for the altar boys. But who cares about them?
Oh, yes, there is certainly work to be done.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
It actually sounds like a very good idea.
ReplyDeleteThere was a time when "orthodox" priests were a tolerable eccentric minority within the Church.
The collapse of vocations has meant that several of these folks were accepted as candidates for the priesthood.
If Nuns can weed out the "eccentrics" then it would indeed be a good thing.
It would of course be unfortunate if ALL eccentrics were weeded out.
I am very much in favour of Diversity.
I'm not talking about screaming reactionaries, just people who - call them old-fashioned - agree with the Magisterium.
ReplyDeleteThe pederast promotion comes, of course, out of the same stable as Harriet Harman's and Patricia Hewitt's support for the Paedophile Information Exchange and Paedophile Action for Liberation.
So were the nuns child-hating and boy-hating? Or were they secret paedophile-promoters?
ReplyDeleteThe latter because the former.
ReplyDelete