What's It All About?

So young Alfie is not the Daddy after all.

Women, as it would have to be, have been all over the radio claiming that boys cannot impregnate until they are 43 or something. Mothers of teenage sons, I expect.

But there is absolutely no doubt that the fragrant Chantelle went to bed with a 12-year-old. Is she in custody? If not, why not?

And remember those pictures of his rather nice home: she was clearly casting her net far and wide, and I suggest that she was attracted to him by nothing more or less than his parents' obvious wealth.

Not for the first time in this case, imagine the roles reversed. Or if Alfie had been seduced by a girl from his own background. Posh girls do get pregnant too, you know. It's just that they have abortions. Yet still this whole story is being run as "Let's all laugh, but in a disgusted way, at the Jeremy Kyle classes".

The great sage and wordsmith David Cameron opined that he was "really worried" by this case. Is he also "really worried" at today's revelation that underage chlamydia is up by ninety per cent?

Clearly not, since he has never questioned those who call for ever-more "sex education". In fact, this girl and her child's actual, also underage father have been brought to this situation precisely by that publicly funded grooming.

No one in this country over the age of seven or eight can now be in the slightest doubt as to where babies come from. Yet things like this go on happening, underage abortions are routinely recorded as other things in order to disguise the real rate of them, venereal disease is at epidemic levels among the very young, and so on, and on, and on.

The real reason for public grooming is exactly the same as that for private grooming: to encourage children into sex with each other and with adults. And it is succeeding only too horrifically well.