Proving what a dangerous Maoist infiltrator he is (maybe, just maybe, it is his metrosexuality-by-force-of-arms critics who are unpatriotic and un-British?), Andy Newman writes:
In January 2013, Vince Cable, the business
secretary, announced that the relationship between pub companies (PubCos)and
publicans would be defined in law, and an independent adjudicator appointed to
examine unfair practices.
The Financial Times reported Mr Cable speech at the time,
where the minister said:
There is some real hardship in the pubs
sector . . . some of this is due to pubcos exploiting and squeezing their
tenants by unfair practices and a focus on short-term profits.” He said he
wanted the statutory code to enshrine the principle that tied licensees should
be no worse off than independents. The code will apply to pubcos with more than
500 tied leases, following evidence that smaller pubcos have behaved more
responsibly towards publicans than the bigger operators.”
But yesterday, Conservative and Liberal Democrat
MPs voted AGAINST a Labour Opposition Day Motion, calling for Pubco regulation
to be introduced in this year’s Queen’s Speech; this latest vote suggests they
have no intention of legislating to protect local pubs.
An estimated 26 pubs are closing each week in
Britain and the large chains of PubCos have been accused of giving landlords a
raw deal, with many paying over the odds for their alcoholic products.
In May
2013 a number of organizations formed the “‘Fair Deal for Your Local’ campaign”, Guild of Master
Victuallers, Campaign for Real Ale , Federation of Small Businesses, Forum of
Private Businesses, Fair Pint Campaign, Licensees Supporting Licensees, Justice
for Licensees, Save the Pub Group and Licensees Unite.
The GMB trade union
joined the organisation in July 2013, and Steve Kemp, GMB political officer,
said: “GMB wants MPs to support the option which
will give tied pub tenants the ability to buy products from the open market and
pay a fair market rent for the building.”
Pub campaigners are asking that a legally
enforceable code should include a free-of-tie option, open market rent reviews
and an independent pubs adjudicator.
This would give every landlord the choice
to go free-of-tie, allowing licencees to operate in a more competitive market.
Thriving pub businesses are vital hubs for
communities and are valued strongly by local people. Pub closures costs jobs,
especially for young people, and hits the local economy by an average of
£80,000 each time a pub shuts.
In small towns and villages it also takes away
an important focus for bringing people together.
We need to back our local pubs.
That’s why, it’s
time for the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats to take real action to support
small landlords otherwise we all risk losing more pubs, and more jobs.
I have little faith in the ability of politicians to preserve the pubs through legislation. Where they have tried to protect the competitiveness and diversity of the pub industry, their intervention has had precisely the opposite effect to that intended, as with the 1989 Beer Orders - http://www.sunriseag.net/adoptapub/A01-beerorders.htm - and most recent legislation seems to have been designed to destroy the industry (the duty escalator and the smoking ban being two obvious examples).
ReplyDelete