On something only just short of an official Labour Party website, that party's single largest donor, John Mills, writes:
Late last year, the Financial Times printed an article suggesting that Labour party figures were coming
under pressure from politicians in Europe to spell out their position on an EU
referendum.
Really we shouldn’t be surprised that confusion
over the party’s stance on giving the British people a vote has spread
overseas. This is one of the defining issues of the day.
Some weeks there are very positive noises and
then other weeks, such as happened in late December, someone like Tony Blair’s
former Political Director John McTernan [who hasn't mattered for years, and who knows it] will emerge and tell the country that
Labour won’t ever offer a referendum.
Having a say on Europe is something that a lot of
people feel very strongly about (more on this later) and, if the volume of
emails, tweets and arguments that get directed towards both me and Labour for a
Referendum are any clue, the void in our EU policy is upsetting our domestic
supporters as well as those on the continent.
It was in this atmosphere of uncertainty that
Labour for a Referendum launched last summer, committed to raising the issue
of, and support for, an EU referendum within the party.
As a coalition of those who want to leave and
stay in, we were surprised and delighted by the levels of support we received
from MPs, peers, councillors and party members, and we believe we set off a
debate within the party that continues today.
In recent months, the likes of Keith Vaz, Kate
Hoey, Owen Jones and Richard Wilson have been joined by Austin Mitchell, Tom
Watson and Lord Prescott, raising the status of the issue even further.
I know some Labour Party people are wary of this
campaign.
They argue that the party needs to focus on core
issues – the cost of living crisis that Ed Miliband skilfully identified in the
summer and has stuck Cameron on the back foot ever since, the energy bill
freeze, the bedroom tax, payday loans.
However I would argue that a prospective future
government must be able to confront the big issues of the day, and Europe falls
squarely within this bracket.
Those who like to point to the issues tracker
that places the EU down on the list of voters’ concerns, ought to recognise
that the issues that place above it – immigration, economy, even taxation – are
all affected, if not determined, by the EU. An EU referendum is also
universally popular – with large majorities of, notably, Labour voters backing
the call for a vote.
And, as the Chairman of the People’s Pledge, I
can tell you that we received huge levels of support from those on the Left
when we held referenda on holding an in/out vote in seats around the country.
There are now just four months until the EU
elections. Allied with the local elections, this should be a vote that the
Labour Party is looking to win outright.
We can’t just cede victory to Ukip with a
resigned shrug [no chance of that, anyway; it is tied with the Conservatives for a distant second place] because we have been too scared to take a stance on an EU
referendum.
The Labour for a Referendum campaign is gearing
up. Will you help me make the case, and help our party win in 2014
and 2015?
If he wants to leave the EU, why isn't he happy to " cede" the Euro elections to UKIP, the only pro- withdrawal party in the race?
ReplyDeleteThe poor old dear is clearly confused.
Now, when in 2014 Labour remains the only party in Parliament not to offer even a referendum, will Mills do the decent thing and switch to UKIP?
Even Cameron is better than Labour-even he offers a referendum.
Mills must be embarrassed.
UKIP is not a party. UKIP is just an angry golf club after too much gin. It is tied with the Conservatives for third place at the Euros. Third.
ReplyDeleteThe Euros? It doesn't work like that.
ReplyDelete