It has been 20 years since I read Hard Times as a set book at my bog standard comp.
Polly Toynbee writes:
Polly Toynbee writes:
Michael Gove is Mr
M'Choakumchild and Thomas Gradgrind personified: "What I want is, Facts. Teach these boys and girls nothing but
Facts. Facts alone are wanted in life. Plant nothing else, and root out
everything else." In Gove's schools, whatever might seize the imagination,
give pleasure and stay in the heart and mind for a lifetime longer than
rote-learned facts is being rooted out.
When he has done with cleansing the curriculum,
it may be the case that fewer people know who Gradgrind and M'Choakumchild are.
Dickens and much of literature will be a closed book to those not lucky enough
to encounter them outside their exam-crammed education. English literature is to be stripped out of the core English GCSE exam,
leaving nothing but grammatical correctness and straitjacket language reduced
to right and wrong answers.
Literature is to become an optional extra, and
probably not a highly regarded one, for fear it might let the imagination roam
dangerously free. English language, maths, three sciences, a foreign language
and history or geography are the core English
baccalaureate subjects. The rest is silence, more or less. (But soon few may recognise
that reference.) In a world of harsh exams, with the screw tightened down to
factual rigour, league table tyranny will increasingly sideline optional
extras.
An array of writers, artists and academics fired
off a letter of protest to the Sunday Times, including Michael Morpurgo,
Robert Harris, Sheila Hancock, Miriam Margolyes and professors John Carey and
John Sutherland. The new English literature exam will become more rigorous,
concentrating on pre-20th century texts, which may deter all but enthusiasts: when
everyone had to do some literature, it was more accessible to all. Prof
Sutherland talks of how "the humanities humanise us".
No doubt Gove thinks that soft-headed, but he
might ponder the conservative values of preserving the best. If few read literature
together, the idea of a canon vanishes. The Bible has all but gone in a
generation, a deep cultural loss: apart from the nativity, there is no common
reference point, no chill to the marrow at God telling Abraham to cut his son's throat, no common
understanding of a reference to Lazarus.
Another term of Gove-ism, and Jane
Austen, Dickens, Orwell, Wilfred Owen, JD Salinger and all the rest will go the
same way: it doesn't take long. Pupils may groan at literary texts, but books
stay in the mind for further exploring. Whatever is unexamined with marks and
tables is unvalued under the Gove whip.
The consultation in progress is unlikely to
change the plan. Gove pretends it's for schools to choose – but drama, dance,
art and now literature will slip away. Confident top schools may keep these
subjects, but average schools, under intense pressure to perform in core EBacc
exams, will let the rest slide. The Cultural Learning Alliance argues passionately for the cause of
arts in schools. The Arts Council is negotiating valiantly behind the scenes
with Ofqual about how to ensure
arts exams are as rigorous, and so of equal status, as the rest.
In Gove's groves of academe, high achievers will
be more clearly set apart, laurels for the winners in his regime of fact and
rote, 1950s grammar schools reprised, rewarding those who already thrive under
any system. The UK always scored well with top students: it is the long tail of
those falling behind who drag down our ranking in PISA tables.
He is giving
this unequal society, made more so by this government, schools better honed to
reflect that social difference. The hurdles are set higher, the fallers will
fall further and harder, with fewer paths into education for those not fired up
by a strict diet of maths, grammar, physics and French.
Rudely Gove dismisses the education world as "the blob" – but
if he asked further education colleges, those havens of second and third
chances, what best rescues students failed by schools first time round, it is
often those other doors into the many gardens of learning.
Schools need friendly secret niches with
different kinds of teachers: for some children it might be sport, for others
design, art, music, dance or drama where other talents and enthusiasms are
welcomed to draw a child in, not propel them out. New GCSE codes downgrade all
these, urging schools to discourage them. Under Gove's tutelage 14% fewer
pupils are taking arts GCSEs.
The Commons education select committee reports
that the EBacc effect narrows options away from the arts, affecting
disadvantaged children most. An Ipsos Mori report finds that schools with a
high proportion of children taking free school meals are more than twice as
likely to abandon arts subjects as are privileged schools.
Gove boasts: "We've rewarded
schools that teach traditional subjects, which help all students get into
university." Liz Truss, his
minister, parrots: "We are rebalancing the curriculum towards
high-value subjects – in maths, sciences, DT, computing, English and
languages."
What is "low value" about drama? Small
children learn through acting out imaginary roles. There is no discipline
tougher than putting on a play, relying on one another, learning a part,
hitting a cue, in mortal peril of failure and hope of triumph before an
audience. Anyone who ever acted in a school play remembers it for ever. Ability
to speak out, perform and pretend is essential for most jobs, from estate agent
upwards.
Employers complain that young people mumble, slouch and don't look
them in the eye, prizing the "soft skills" that elite schools teach
through drama and debating. Emotionally, drama teaches children lacking in
empathy to put themselves into others' shoes, to express fears.
But ever fewer schools employ specialist drama
teachers: English teachers may or may not have an aptitude. Shakespeare is on
the curriculum, no longer to be examined, but dead on the page without
performance to breathe life and sense into it.
The RSC sends out a toolkit to
help-teachers teach Shakespeare. The Shakespeare
Schools Festival is in progress, a thousand primary and secondaries
performing in real theatres everywhere, a brilliant project – but drama should
be the right of every child. No school should be judged good or outstanding
unless it's good at arts: the Arts Council awards an "Artsmark" to
schools that do well, but only a quarter earn it.
My guess is Gove wouldn't
send a child of his to any school that regards arts as a waste of time.
No comments:
Post a Comment