David Mitchell writes:
Have you noticed those special sparkly poppies
that some people on television have taken to wearing instead of the normal
ones? I don't know when they first cropped up – it feels like about two years
ago, which usually means it's roughly 10. But only this year did it start to
get on my nerves.
I don't know why I was initially fine with them.
That's not like me. Maybe it's because of the context. The X Factor, where I
first noticed them, is such a hellish environment, such a horrendous,
screaming, Klingon parliament of a space, that even those glittery whored-up
symbols of remembrance seemed to have an incongruous innocent simplicity about
them, rather like the original poppies which grew out of the cordite-wrecked
soil of the western front.
But then Louis Walsh changed my mind. I was
flicking through the channels a couple of weeks ago when, like a moth drawn to
the flame, like an addict returning to the needle, like an early 20th-century
emperor lured into a conflict he will be able neither to control nor
comprehend, I paused to watch some hopeless hopefuls forgettably finish singing
a song and then line up to hear it described as unforgettable.
Walsh, his very presence a more devastating
refutation of the principle of the sanctity of human life than Verdun, was
repeating a platitude that had been expressed seconds earlier by someone else –
only altering the word order slightly so that it didn't quite make sense.
His
mouth was opening and closing, his ears were waggling, his voice was straining
to be heard over the screeches of audience approval which his empty praise was
generating, and my eyes, drawn to the screen yet repelled by his face, lighted
on the blinged-up poppy on his fucking shirt. I saw it clearly for the first
time.
How dare television designers adapt this token of
remembrance to blend in with their trashy aesthetic? How dare they make it
twinkly? The poppy is an incredibly moving symbol. This flower somehow
flourished on battlefields smashed by the world's first experience of
industrialised war – a war of unprecedented carnage which became almost as
terrifying to the statesmen who had let it start as it was to the millions of
soldiers who were killed or wounded by it.
Such was the international shock that, even after
our side had won, no one could bring themselves to remember it with anything
other than unalloyed sorrow. No victory arches, no triumphal parades, but the
plain, mournful Cenotaph and a tradition of wearing paper versions of the
flowers that had grown among the dead, the petals with which nature had rebuked
the murderousness of men.
That's why, while I understand the point they're
trying to make, I disagree with those who eschew the red poppy but wear a white
one for peace. To me, the poppy is already a pacifist rather than a martial
symbol – a sign that war should be rejected at almost all costs.
The poppy represents the consensus that existed
after the armistice – not a military or political consensus, but an emotional
one that the indiscriminate bloodletting of total war was too terrible ever to
be forgotten, that only in solemn remembrance can any sense be made of those
millions of deaths. On that simple point, almost everyone was, and continues to
be, agreed.
And for the symbol to be powerful and meaningful, I think it needs
to be uniform – as uniform as the franchise. We should all wear the same type
of poppy or it's like some of us saying "I'm Spartacus" in a funny
voice. By encouraging the sparkly poppy, TV producers almost literally gild the
lily. And literally glamorise war.
However, this broad consensus is only powerful if
it's genuine, and genuinely voluntary. So people were rightly outraged last
week by the wrongful outrage provoked by ITV News presenter Charlene White's decision not to wear a poppy
on TV. This included a fair bit of racist and misogynistic abuse, much of it
emanating from rightwing extremists up in arms at the disrespect they claimed
she'd shown to soldiers who'd died fighting against rightwing extremists.
In a way, Charlene White is fortunate that her
detractors centred on organisations like the English Defence League, because
it's not unknown for more respectable members of the community to have a pop at
poppy-absence – and their censure is harder to shake off.
The Mirror generated
some negative publicity for the BBC out of the fact of some viewers complaining
about a lack of poppies on the Halloween-themed edition of Strictly Come
Dancing, broadcast more than a week before Remembrance Sunday.
And Labour
MP Gerry Sutcliffe wasn't too busy to criticise Google for sporting too small a
poppy on its homepage, saying: "Around Remembrance Day it is
demeaning not to have something that is spectacular." Something more like
the artillery barrage which started the Battle of the Somme, perhaps.
The effect of these criticisms is corrosive. It
means that people on TV, and appearing in public in general, will come to wear
poppies primarily to avoid disapproval – in fact they're undoubtedly doing so
already. Privately they may buy and wear poppies as an act of respect or
remembrance, or they may not, but publicly they'll just wear them for a quiet
life. "Lest We Forget" will be reduced to the level of remembering to
check your flies are done up. That's not a meaningful consensus any more –
that's just bland conformity.
If this development goes unchallenged, the next
stage in the story of the poppy is inevitable: if people have to wear
them to be deemed respectable, then gradually more people will start refusing
as a gesture of rebellion against the establishment.
The poppy will cease to be
a symbol of the horror of war and of soldiers' sacrifice and it will become a
political badge of the status quo – the Unknown Soldier will be displaced by
George Osborne. The fallen will be forgotten as a direct result of the efforts
of those who wish to enforce their remembrance.
It's wonderfully humane and moving if everyone
wears a poppy – but only if they don't feel they have to, and wouldn't fear not
to. Otherwise, we really might as well doll up our poppies with sequins,
because they'll have stopped meaning anything at all.
No comments:
Post a Comment