Kevin Meagher, with whom I was greatly impressed at the Blue Labour conference this year, writes:
If you control language then you control the
debate. That is what the Italian Marxist theorist Antonio Gramsci claimed in
his theory of “passive revolution”, which focused on shaping attitudes in order
to secure changes in a society’s culture.
The methods may seem opaque now, but his
successors are those who seek to reduce Christianity’s special place in society
by anonymising religious denominations and removing any sense of entitlement,
either for Catholics, Anglicans or, more broadly, for this country’s Christian
heritage.
This is the product of a pseudo-liberal
groupthink that remains inherently hostile to the religious having any role in
public affairs at all. It therefore seeks to “manage” religions (or, as they
are termed these days, “faith communities”), lumping Catholicism in with small
groups like Scientology and the Bahá’í.
We find ourselves corralled together as
“people of faith” in order to be controlled, minimised and, all too often,
demonised. This all stems from a mindset where religion is seen to be an
inherently regressive force, something that once enjoyed privileges and from
whose clutches society should be escaping.
Something that’s had too much power and now needs
firmly putting in its place. In fact, so pervasive is this belief that no less
a figure than Barack Obama spouts it. Speaking in Northern Ireland while he was
attending the G8 earlier this year, Obama said: “If towns remain divided – if
Catholics have their schools and buildings, and Protestants have theirs – if we
can’t see ourselves in one another, if fear and resentment are allowed to
harden, that encourages division. It discourages cooperation.”
At a stroke, his
infuriating remarks reduced a complex ethno-national conflict to the fault of
Catholic schools and the insulting, injurious and entirely spurious belief they
are somehow fermenting intolerance and hatred.
Yet whatever disdain liberals reserve for the
role of Catholic education now pales against the suspicion they direct towards
the steady trickle of Islamic schools that are beginning to open up. Last month
the Al-Madinah free school in Derby was judged by schools regulator Ofsted to
be inadequate, with the threat that it would be closed unless urgent measures
were taken to rectify its poor performance, which included discrimination
against girl pupils and non-Muslims.
There will have been a collective
muttering of “I told you so” among the panjandrums of the liberal educational
elite, who see a growth in Muslim schools as a nightmare scenario, a de facto
licence to introduce gender discrimination into the classroom, with a
curriculum offering little more than “madrassas on the rates”.
Yet, rather than deal with the problem at hand,
describing the Al-Madinah free school as a “faith school” is a way of not
calling it a “Muslim school”. This way, Islamic schools can be challenged, but
couched as a collective punishment for the God botherers.
This is why “faith”
is a linguistic holding pen for Catholics, a way of marginalising the role of
religion in society, but also a means for Catholics and other Christians to
cross-subsidise Islam. This is the product of a post-9/11 obsession in trying
to bring Islam into the mainstream to avert any accusation that there is a
“clash of civilisations” with western Christian mores. The solution to reducing
Islam’s “otherness” has been to place Muslims firmly together with all the
other “people of faith”.
In minimising religion in this way, the aim is to
reduce it to a solely private matter. It cannot provide moral leadership in a
pluralist society. It must not provide adoption agency services that do not
abide by strictures about gay relationships. And it certainly should not be
involved in “indoctrinating” children with religion in school.
As Catholics, it is time we reasserted our
separateness. We should stop allowing ourselves to be hemmed in by those who
seek to manage and marginalise us. We should lead a counter-Gramscian cultural
shift towards making the expression of religious conviction in the public
sphere seem normal again. This should start by eschewing terms like “faith
school” and “faith community”. It should also mean proudly and visibly
proclaiming Catholic schools to be just that.
After all, there are no problems with Christian
church schools. They offer the state sector – as they always have done – a
bedrock of consistently superb educational establishments, basing access not on
wealth but simply on religious adherence.
Measured either by parental consent or
examination results, church schools form the building blocks of our state
education system. So those liberals who dislike them should be forced to come
clean about what they really mean.
Of course, what they really want is no more
Al-Madinahs. They want to strangle off the very concept of Muslim schools,
which they believe will usher in retrograde practices (with some evidence, it
has to be said). But their liberalism is torn between protecting the rights of
a religious and ethnic minority and upholding universal rights for girls.
That’s their headache.
It’s time we Christians stopped allowing
ourselves and our institutions to be framed as a problem simply because
atheistic liberal opinion is too weak, or too conflicted, to face up to and
deal with Islam’s less attractive cultural practices.
Of course, the parents at the Al-Madinah free
school are simply exercising the same parental choice we enjoy in establishing
a school that gives expression to the tenets of their religion. But if they see
the value of boys and girls differently, the state, in the guise of Ofsted’s
inspectors, is entitled to come down hard on their errant practices. But that
is their battle to fight, not ours.
We Catholics should defend our right to religious
freedom and parental choice, defending the record of Catholic schools in
providing first-rate comprehensive education. We should throw off the shackles
that have us bound up as a faith group in order to be classified and
marginalised by atheistic pseudo-liberals.
We should wrest control the debate
by insisting on our own language to define ourselves. We can start that process
by losing “faith”.
Kevin Meagher is associate editor of the
website Labour Uncut and a former special adviser in the last Labour government.
"the Blue Labour conference"
ReplyDeleteSince there's nothing left of Blue Labour, and nobody any longer knows that it exists, I'm surprised the "conference" (if that's the word for it) wasn't held in some dank underground bunker attended by a few bearded men in hoods and disguises, perhaps in some disused farmhouse with a guard at the gate.
Well, it wasn't. You need to get out more.
ReplyDeleteAnon@22:58 must be thinking of UKIP.
ReplyDeleteSomeone still has to be, I suppose.
ReplyDelete