Rahul Pandita writes:
The late 1960s were heady times. In China, the
Cultural Revolution was in progress. And in Calcutta, in eastern India,
restless and angry youths were hurling crude bombs at police vans.
It was not far from there that a Maoist rebellion
broke out in 1967, which China termed as “a peal of spring thunder”. India had
gained independence 20 years ago. But nothing had changed for its poor. Many
young men and women rose to the call of revolution, drawing inspiration from
Maoist ideology. Many of them came from middle-class families.
One such young man returned to India from London,
without completing a course in accountancy. He returned wearing an overcoat
that had 24 secret pockets, all stuffed with Maoist literature. Kobad Ghandy
came from a wealthy family in Bombay – his father was the finance director of
Glaxo pharmaceuticals.
Kobad had been radicalised in the UK and would
become the leading light of the Maoist movement in India, only arrested by the
police in 2009. Towards the end of 1969 a young British teacher, Mary Tyler,
also came to India along with her Indian husband Amalendu Sen. They joined a
Maoist group active on the Bengal-Bihar border in eastern India. But shortly afterwards,
they were arrested by the police.
Mary spent five years in an Indian jail.
Defending the actions of her rebel husband she writes: “Amalendu’s crime … is
the crime of all those who cannot remain unmoved and inactive in an India …
where justice is the exception and injustice the rule.”
The Maoism of Comrade Bala had been a historical
footnote until now. But it is that sense of injustice that is still attracting
thousands of people – mostly tribal people known as the Adivasis – to the
Maoist movement. The Maoists are active in central and eastern India areas left
ungoverned for decades. It is this void that the Maoists have filled.
But revolution remains a utopia. The Adivasis are
now caught in a vicious war between the Maoists and the state. They continue to
suffer.
No comments:
Post a Comment