Supposed defenders of traditional America are preparing to leaflet against ObamaCare. In shopping malls. On Thanksgiving.
But in the midst of this madness, John writes:
But in the midst of this madness, John writes:
In an interesting piece
in The Atlantic, Megan
Garber discusses the
new plan to have the U.S. Post Office deliver Amazon packages on
Sundays. Ms. Garber also describes how an alliance of churches and labor unions
ended Sunday delivery in 1912. While many people probably don't care much about
this development, I find it rather disturbing.
Christian religious
observance is being undermined by commercialism. Taking just one example, more
people are working
on Christmas than ever before. While I understand the need for health and
emergency staff to work on holidays (of course, with extra compensation), I am
shocked by how many non-essential services such as restaurants and stores
are open during the holidays. And yes, it is often the case that those who must
work on the holidays are in low-paying service jobs.
The decline in the
observance of holidays as days of rest from paid labor is part of capitalism's
tendency to subject all of human life to economic calculation and the demands
of capital. When Christianity was the dominant cultural force in Europe during
the Middle Ages, peasants and artisans actually had ample holiday time.Workers sometimes
had as much as one-third
of the year off. Medieval farmers and artisans had more
vacation time than their modern counterparts.
Despite predictions
that leisure time would increase in advanced societies, Americans and Western
Europeans are seeing their leisure time scaled back under neoliberalism. The
eight-hour workday and other victories won by the labor movement are being
demolished while workers are harangued by capitalists and their lackeys in the
government and media about the need to stay competitive in the global
economy.
Amintore
Fanfani, in his seminal work Catholicism,
Protestantism, and Capitalism, described how the capitalist state
reduced the influence of Christianity and other forces that might impede
the rationalization of society along capitalist lines. As Fanfani wrote:
"The one
endeavor of capitalism has been to emancipate itself from ideas, or
institutions based upon ideas, that impeded the economic rationalization of
life." (Fanfani 1934: 92).
Interestingly, Fanfani
goes on to described the Soviet Union as the final realization of
capitalist civilization, writing:
"It may seem a
paradox, but the most technically perfect economic realization of capitalistic
civilization is the Soviet system, in which all private and public efforts have
only one end: the economic rationalization of the whole of life, to the point
of abolishing private property and the family and of attempting the destruction
of all religious ideals that might threaten such materialistic rationalization.
Russia has carried the rationalizing experiment of capitalism to its logical
conclusion." (Fanfani 1934: 92).
In opposition to both
capitalism and communism, Fanfani presents the Church as the entity that has,
throughout history, sought to protect society from domination by purely
economic forces.
"In the Middle Ages, by supporting the intervention of public bodies in economic life as a check to individual activity and to defend the interests of society as a whole; in our own time, by calling for State intervention for the same reasons, the Church has remained faithful to her anti-capitalistic ethics. Both during the predominance of the medieval guild system, and during that of capitalism, the Church, and those Catholics that listened to her voice, set or sought to set bounds not lawfully to be overstepped to the course of economic life — even at the cost of a sacrifice of mechanical and technical progress, which in the Catholic conception of society, has never been identical with civilization."(Fanfani 1934: 126).
"In the Middle Ages, by supporting the intervention of public bodies in economic life as a check to individual activity and to defend the interests of society as a whole; in our own time, by calling for State intervention for the same reasons, the Church has remained faithful to her anti-capitalistic ethics. Both during the predominance of the medieval guild system, and during that of capitalism, the Church, and those Catholics that listened to her voice, set or sought to set bounds not lawfully to be overstepped to the course of economic life — even at the cost of a sacrifice of mechanical and technical progress, which in the Catholic conception of society, has never been identical with civilization."(Fanfani 1934: 126).
Thus, we can see that
sacrificing the leisure time of workers to the demands of the capitalist market
is antithetical to the Catholic conception of society, which places certain
non-economic values above purely economic ones, even if it may reduce
competitiveness or technical progress or some other material aspect of life.
From a Catholic perspective, those who insist on market fundamentalism are
making the same mistake as followers of Marxist communism. This
mistake is the reduction of all politics, and indeed all of human life, to
economics.
Therefore, we should
not be surprised when Pope Francis discusses the need for workers to have plenty
of leisure time, a sentiment also shared by his immediate
predecessor. It is not a coincidence that the decline of Christian influence
in the West has led to an erosion of working conditions for Western workers.
Without a strong, countervailing philosophical force to stand in its way,
capital can simply run over whatever feeble opposition secularists manage
to put up. By separating Christianity and economics, we have allowed ourselves
to be ruled by the high priests of Mammon.
WORKS CITED
Fanfani, Amintore. Catholicism,
Protestantism, and Capitalism. 1934. Reprint. (Norfolk,
VA.: IHS Press, 2003).
I don't understand why the Left in Britain are so protective over the supposed Affordable Health Care for America Act.
ReplyDeleteIt isn't - and not even close to - a form of socialized health care provision, so much so that even Bill Clinton has felt the necessary compunction to criticize it publicly.
The Mormon from Massachusetts was the man to deliver that. But we know what the Left did to him, don't we?
That has nothing to do with the substance of this post.
ReplyDelete