This is what you voted for, neocons on purpose (think Turkey, Kosovo, Pakistan, Kashmir, Chechnya, Azerbaijan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Xinjiang...) and the BNP because you are the not exactly over-bright BNP, when you removed a son of the white working class as Mayor of London and replaced him with an Ottoman aristocrat of very recent extraction who has publicly recited the Shahada in Arabic.
Take a look over the list of signatories to and officers of the Henry Jackson Society, or the original list on the Euston Manifesto, and tell me that any of those people, including sitting Labour MPs, who live in London (as almost, if almost, all of them do) did not vote Boris Johnson for Mayor and the BNP for the Assembly. Tell me. But I won't believe you.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Why would they have done that?
ReplyDeleteBNP stalwarts voted for Johnson because they are thick, or at least extremely ill-informed.
ReplyDeleteBut the Euston/Jacksosn lot and their associates purposely put in a man whom they knew would call for an amnesty for the illigal immigrants on whom their own lifestyle depends.
And they purposely put a BNP member on the GLA in order to blame it on the white working class, the better to marginalise it yet further politically, and the better to repress it yet further economically, socially, culturally and physically.
And they purposely put a BNP member on the GLA
ReplyDeleteYour impression of the reach of the Eustonites seems far removed from the apparent reality. Can you clarify exactly how they were able to engineer this?
I signed the Euston Manifesto. Not only did I vote for Ken Livingstone, I campaigned for him.
ReplyDelete(I don't agree with Boris about the amnesty - but it's worth noting that Ken does. All three main candidates called for an amnesty for illegal immigrants during the campaign.)
Just one more reason why we need new parties.
ReplyDeleteMistoffeelees, "apparent" is the word.
Just one more reason why we need new parties.
So are you going to answer my question? How exactly did they engineer a BNP victory?
ReplyDeleteThey didn't.
ReplyDeleteBut they contributed towards it, as the extremely tight-knit and heavily London-based lot that they are.
I see now that the head of the Catholic Church in England supports an amnesty. What say you to that?
ReplyDeleteAh, so they're 'tight knit'. That explains everything. And thank you for clarifying your own position.
ReplyDelete"I see now that the head of the Catholic Church in England supports an amnesty. What say you to that?"
ReplyDeleteHe retires in the very near future.
"Ah, so they're 'tight knit'. That explains everything."
It explains a great deal, yes. Did you think that they had never met each other, or something?