Iain Dale reports the difficulty of trying to persuade Greenpeace (a centimillionaire, seriously elite organisation, I might add) to debate global warming.
Well, cutting CO2 emissions has a long history as a solution in search of a problem. Time was when it was supposed to be the solution to global cooling.
Funnily enough, it always involves no restoration (indeed, the further destruction) of high-wage, high-skilled, high-status jobs for the working classes in general and for working-class men in particular, plus little or no economic growth in the poorer parts of the world.
Such jobs would also be created, in an entirely "carbon neutral" way, by nuclear power, which offers independence from Arab oil and Russian gas. The super-rich, super-posh Greenpeace lobby is dead against that, too. How very odd...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment