As the F-16s wing their way and as Keir Starmer effectively declares war by authorising the use of British-supplied Storm Shadows inside Russia, while the bombing of hospitals and the killing of children go unremarked when they happen in Gaza, this letter appears in, of all publications, the Financial Times:
Russia’s latest military gains in the Donetsk region reinforce the case for a negotiated settlement of the war in Ukraine. The US and its allies support Ukraine’s key war aim, which is a return to the 2014 frontiers, i.e., Russia’s expulsion from Crimea and Donbas. But all informed analysts agree that short of a serious escalation of war, the likeliest outcome will be continued stalemate on the ground, with a not insignificant chance of a Russian victory.
This conclusion points to the desirability, even urgency, of a negotiated peace, not least for the sake of Ukraine itself. Reluctance by the official west to accept a negotiated peace rests on the belief that anything short of a complete Ukrainian victory would allow Putin to “get away with it”.
But this ignores by far the most important outcome of the war so far: that Ukraine has fought for its independence, and won it — as Finland did in 1939-40. Some territorial concessions would seem a small price to pay for the reality, rather than semblance, of independence.
If a peace based on roughly the present division of forces in Ukraine is inevitable, it is immoral not to try for it now.
Washington should start talks with Moscow on a new security pact which would safeguard the legitimate security interests of both Ukraine and Russia. The announcement of these talks should be immediately followed by a time-limited ceasefire in Ukraine. The ceasefire would enable Russian and Ukrainian leaders to negotiate in a realistic, constructive manner.
We urge the world’s leaders to initiate or support such an initiative. The longer the war continues the more territory Ukraine is likely to lose, and the more the pressure for escalation up to a nuclear level is likely to grow. The sooner peace is negotiated the more lives will be saved, the sooner the reconstruction of Ukraine will start and the more quickly the world can be pulled back from the very dangerous brink at which it currently stands.
Lord Skidelsky
Professor Emeritus of Political Economy, University of Warwick
Sir Anthony Brenton
British Ambassador to Russia (2004-2008)
Thomas Fazi
Journalist, author, columnist for UnHerd
Anatol Lieven
Senior Fellow, Quincy Institute for Responsible Statesmanship
Jack Matlock
US Ambassador to the USSR (1987-1991)
Ian Proud
British Embassy in Moscow (2014-2019)
Richard Sakwa
Professor Emeritus of Russian and European Politics, University of Kent
Christopher Granville
British Embassy, Moscow (1991-1995)
Who do they think they are, Oliver Kamm?
ReplyDeleteWho?
DeleteThe way to read these letters is that the arguments expressed in the letter are not important. Who signed the letter and where it appeared is what is important.
ReplyDeleteIt is all important, but I know what you mean.
DeleteI got The Times to publish an endorsement of Jeremy Corbyn by world class economists in the summer of 2015. There is someone who has never got over it.