Friday, 22 September 2023

The Safeguarding Challenge: Day 74

I am morally and factually innocent of every criminal offence with which I have ever been charged, and the allegation at the base of any outstanding charge has been made in order to incite my suicide.

That purely factual statement is acknowledged as such, unless and until it had been expressly repudiated to davidaslindsay@hotmail.comby each and all of the members of the Board of the Catholic Safeguarding Standards Agency, currently Nazir Afzal, Amanda Ellingworth, Wesley Cuell, Bishop Paul Mason, Carol Lawrence, Jenny Holmes, Sister Frances Orchard CJ, and Sir David Behan.

That purely factual statement is acknowledged as such, unless and until it had been expressly repudiated to davidaslindsay@hotmail.comby each and all of the members of the Hexham and Newcastle Diocesan Safeguarding Committee, currently Monsignor Andrew Faley, Gail McGregor, Paul Weatherstone, Father Christopher Hancock MHM, Father Jeff Dodds, Canon William Agley, and Catherine Dyer.

And that purely factual statement is acknowledged as such, unless and until it had been expressly repudiated to davidaslindsay@hotmail.com, by each and all of the members of the Hexham and Newcastle Diocesan Safeguarding Team, currently Meriel Anderson, Ian Colling, Paul Brown, Lisa Short, Yvonne Brown, and Robert Appleby.

I am morally and factually innocent of every criminal offence with which I have ever been charged, and the allegation at the base of any outstanding charge has been made in order to incite my suicide. I should emphasise that there is absolutely no risk that I might ever give anyone the satisfaction of my suicide.

This post will appear daily until further notice.

32 comments:

  1. You have not appealed the conviction where you gave a 'not guilty' plea.

    When you said you were guilty, David, that was good enough for the rest of us.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You must know some of these people.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You said you were going to appeal. Frit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Keeping buying those Lottery tickets for me, then.

      Never say never, but when absolutely no one believes in my guilt, then why bother?

      Delete
  4. Everyone in Lanchester knows you’re guilty as sin.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Give me a name. I am aware of literally nobody, whether in Lanchester or anywhere else.

      Delete
  5. Everyone in Lanchester. Your fingerprints were all over the evidence!

    ReplyDelete
  6. No way. You’re a criminal harasser and I don’t want you stalking me and my family. Get a job and go on a diet, you disgusting slob.

    ReplyDelete
  7. https://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/23577422.county-durham-blogger-denies-breaching-restraining-order/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "I am morally and factually innocent of every criminal offence with which I have ever been charged, and the allegation at the base of any outstanding charge has been made in order to incite my suicide."

      Love to Oliver. He says that he never sets foot in Durham for fear of running into me. But I could pass him in the street and never know. Like you, he has never set eyes on Lanchester.

      Delete
  8. The jury laughed at you. The police laughed at you. Guilty as sin.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Time for your meds, Ollie Boy. Yet another "early retirement" among those who have made an enemy of me.

      Delete
  9. You faked a letter pretending to be a terrorist threat so your trial would be called off. How did that work out for you? Oh do tell! Then go on a crash diet and get a job, you loathsome stalker.

    ReplyDelete
  10. You’ve got a criminal conviction for it!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As already stated on the day after my release: "The instant that Labour lost control of Durham County Council, then I was granted an unsolicited tag for more than 10 weeks of future good behaviour. I invite each and every Member of Parliament for the area covered by Durham County Council, each and every member of Durham County Council, and each and every member of Lanchester Parish Council, to contact davidaslindsay@hotmail.com if they thought that I was factually or morally guilty of any criminal charge that had ever been brought against me. Not legally guilty; Bill Cosby is legally innocent. Factually and morally guilty. No name would be published except at the request of its bearer, but if anyone ever did get in touch, then the readers of this site would be the first to know." The current total is zero.

      Furthermore, I invite each and every other candidate for the parliamentary seat containing Lanchester to contact davidaslindsay@hotmail.com if they thought that I was factually or morally guilty of any criminal charge that had ever been brought against me. Not legally guilty; Bill Cosby is legally innocent. Factually and morally guilty. In this case, names most certainly will be published, including as part of my election literature. The current total is zero. If that remained the case when the next General Election was called, then my literature would state that each and all of my opponents, by name, did not think that I was factually or morally guilty of any criminal charge that had ever been brought against me. At least in that event, then I challenge Oliver Kamm to contest this seat.

      And I invite each and every bishop, priest and deacon of the Diocese of Hexham and Newcastle to contact davidaslindsay@hotmail.com if he thought that I was factually or morally guilty of any criminal charge that had ever been brought against me. Not legally guilty; Bill Cosby is legally innocent. Factually and morally guilty. No name would be published except at the request of its bearer, but if anyone ever did get in touch, then the readers of this site would be the first to know. The current total is zero.

      Delete
  11. Hilarious! You’re a stalker and a liar. You claimed to have a PhD 🤣🤣 Everybody here knows you and knows you are a poisonous stalker who has no friends and no qualifications. The police laugh themselves silly about your stupid hoax. You are such a failure.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Before Red Tory and Blue Labour there was David Lindsay. He was arguably the first to announce a postliberal politics of paradox, and to delve into the deep, unwritten British past in order to craft, theoretically, an alternative British and international future. It is high time that the singular and yet wholly pertinent writings of this County Durham Catholic Labour prophet receive a wider circulation."

      So wrote Professor John Milbank, a sobering 11 years ago now. In April, Kammiknickers in a twist that Matthew Goodwin was a Professor even though Oliver Kamm was not. He used to have the same objection to John, but at least John was 11 years older than Kamm. Goodwin is 18 years younger, which must sting good and hard.

      Kamm has never held an academic position, because he would consider anything below a Chair to be beneath him. So far as I am aware, he has never started a doctorate, or published an academic paper, because that would involve submitting his work to assessment and evaluation. Then again, it would not surprise me in the least if he had either failed to complete a doctoral thesis, or, let my life be complete, submitted one and seen it failed.

      Instead, though, he whines that proper academics are unfit, as if he were competent to judge. And he has spent nearly 20 years claiming that I had once claimed to have a PhD. I have never made any such claim, nor have I ever attempted to become Dr Lindsay. I always correct people who so address me, but it is worth mentioning that I have been making that correction since September or October 1996.

      In one order or the other but I cannot remember which, I received a letter addressed to "Dr David Lindsay" from Jimmy Goldsmith, of all people, and a letter addressed to "The Reverend Dr David Lindsay" from a Reverend Doctor who, at almost exactly the same time, admitted me as an undergraduate for the next year at the Durham college of which he was Principal.

      Sir James was corrected, although he continued the correspondence even once he knew that I was a 19-year-old barman, but my other correspondent left both his position and this country very soon afterwards. To this day, I have never met him, so I can only assume that he thought that there were two David Lindsays at this address, presumably a father and son.

      Goldsmith is the only person without a doctorate ever to have assumed me to have held one, but people with their own have done it with remarkable frequency. For example, the Centre of Theology and Philosophy at the University of Nottingham innocently listed me among its members as "Dr David Lindsay" until Kamm noticed and threw a hissy fit.

      I corrected it, and it was put right. Kamm had been completely ignored on the subject, as was only right and proper. I have no idea why, but academically distinguished people read my work and just assume me to be a PhD. None of them has ever had that reaction to Kamm's effusions. Hey, ho.

      Delete
    2. As for the Reverend thing, an old lady from South Shields did once ask me, "Are you David Miliband, Father?" I explained that I was neither, and that it would have been impossible to have been both. Apart from that, though, the only people to have assumed me to have been ordained have themselves been ordained.

      Again, I am not, I have never claimed to be, and I have never attempted to be. Yet, among other things, I have had "Dear Father Lindsay" from bishops and from Vatican officials, both of whom one might have expected to have been in a position to check. I cannot begin to explain it, although, again, I do of course always correct it.

      I might let "Dr Lindsay" go among my own people, variously conceived, if it were to arise spontaneously among them, in the manner of the late Sheikh Ahmed Yassin. It would wind up Kamm no end, and what is life for, if not for that? Other than that, I would tolerate objections to it only from people who would never have said or written either "Dr Paisley" or "Dr Angelou".

      "We hand this woman, Margaret Thatcher, over to the Devil." "I'm not cute or built to suit a fashion model's size." Dr Lindsay would be happy to give his most favourable peer review to that vintage Dr Angelou and to that vintage Dr Paisley, in that order.

      As for Not Professor Kamm, Professor Goodwin might consider Dr Adel Batterjee of Jeddah, who is both a member of the Editorial Advisory Board of Mankind Quarterly, which is a linchpin of racist pseudo-academia, and, unless there are two Drs Adel Batterjee of Jeddah, the founder of the Benevolence International Foundation, which was a fake charity that was placed under UN sanctions because it was a front for funding al-Qaeda.

      Also on that Editorial Advisory Board is Mankind Quarterly's former Editor, Ed Dutton, whom I knew at university, and whose eugenic views sit ill with the fact that he has been disabled for as long as I have known him, and quite possibly all his life. He also hilariously once tried to seduce me after Mass, so I know his little secret.

      Ed recently secured the publication of this masterpiece in Evolutionary Psychological Science: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40806-018-0158-4. On the Editorial Board of that is Professor Steven Pinker, the Johnstone Professor of Psychology at Harvard, who has very recently written (https://www.weidenfeldandnicolson.co.uk/titles/oliver-kamm/mending-the-mind/9781474610858/): "Oliver Kamm's urbanity, erudition and compassion are raised to the power of two in Mending the Mind. He put them to work in crafting this gorgeous and urgent book, and on every page they remind us of his moral that enviable gifts are no protection against the affliction of depression." Kamm, Pinker, Dutton, Batterjee. Batterjee, Dutton, Pinker, Kamm. Truly, an Axis of Evil.

      Delete
  12. What was it the judge called you? Was it “a pathetic loser”? Why yes it was! Everybody round here says the same about you. Go on a crash diet and get a job.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, it was not. And no, they do not. They really, really, really do not.

      Delete
  13. Oh yes it was. Oh yes we do. Lanchester laughs at the “pathetic loser” alright. Go on a diet and get a job, pathetic loser.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is not all right to write "alright".

      We can all see who is the pathetic loser here.

      Delete
  14. The police laugh at you for faking that letter. Durham laugh at you for faking a PhD. How is the think tank going 🤣🤣

    ReplyDelete
  15. That’s what the judge called you and is your name round here. Get a job and go on a diet, loser. Everyone laughs at you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It isn't, it isn't, they don't, and you have never been here.

      Go to bed, you silly little boy.

      Delete