The only honest part of the most recent witness statement against me, by the person with the coveted distinction of hating me more than anyone else in the world did, was, "[I] was never placed under any restrictions" by or in relation to the Church, and, "[I] was eventually sent a cease and desist letter from the Diocese in respect of [my] conduct towards [the author] but this did not restrict what [I] was doing within [my] parish or church." Honestly, how do these things get around? And in that case, then nothing that had ever been alleged against me could possibly be true. As, of course, it is not. The horse's mouth. A horse that has presumably been sacrificed to Baphomet.
And so to business. Do the four known suicides of wronged subpostmasters prove their guilt? Here is your weekly reminder that this could not have been an executive summary of this. That would have been impossible, since they bear no resemblance to each other. It is all here, including on the ludicrous definition of "grooming" that was used to hound Canon Michael McCoy to his death, apparently as the Satanic sacrifice that my own suicide was intended to have been, and that either my suicide, or my murder in prison, is still intended to be.
Something has changed since 3 May 2023. What is it? And where is the original report? I do not resile from this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this or this. Rather, I reiterate every word of each and all of them. There was no cathedral sex party. The move from the old Bishop's House to the new one made a profit. There was no allegation of sexual assault against Bishop Robert Byrne CO, who should sue every media outlet that had suggested one. Although I am often asked, I know neither where nor how Bishop Byrne is. But I am often asked.
I may not, but I may, accept the present report when Bishop Byrne had done so, and to the extent that he had done so. His Lordship has yet to do so to any extent. At least while that remains the case, then I reject the whole thing out of hand, and so should you. The sum total of the charge sheet against Bishop Byrne is that he did not automatically do as he was told by the hired help. But Pat Buckley, who died in May, did not like Bishop Stephen Wright, so Bishop Wright must be all right.
Indeed, His Lordship preached well at his Enthronement. He clearly has a deep spirituality. There was also a speech by a self-identified survivor of clerical sexual abuse, one Maggie Vickerman. Neither her case, nor those to which she referred, had anything to do with Bishop Byrne, if they really happened at all. How do we know? At most, they were long before his brief time in this Diocese. If anything, certain people with some responsibility for them were in that sanctuary. Nor did Ms Vickerman make any attempt to disguise her theological agenda. Well, nor do I make any attempt to disguise mine.
No comments:
Post a Comment