For the second week running, it seems that I have to wait until Monday for my Spectator, in which Hugo Rifkind writes:
Possibly you’ve missed this. However, for the last three years or thereabouts, I have been conducting a low-key campaign for the revival of the turnip lantern.
Possibly you’ve missed this. However, for the last three years or thereabouts, I have been conducting a low-key campaign for the revival of the turnip lantern.
And this year, for the first time ever, I am remembering
to write about this before Halloween, rather than afterwards, albeit narrowly
so.
Fie on this pumpkin nonsense.
If you are thirtysomething
or older, one surefire way of figuring out whether somebody comes from outside
the M25 is to ask them whether they have ever carved a turnip.
‘A what?’
they’ll ask, if they are from the south-east, because they don’t even know what
turnips are, because they call them swedes.
Which is just one of many ways in
which they are wrong.
For them, anyway, the feckless American import that is a
pumpkin has been an autumnal fixture.
For them, the carving of a lantern has
always been an easy, weak-wristed process, with the bulk of the work done for
you before you even begin.
Never have they hurt themselves doing it. Not unless
they’re cack-handed as hell.
Never has their honest childhood blood added a
purple tinge to the inside of the lid.
You want to know the true metropolitan elite? They’re the
people who don’t even realise that, outside London, pumpkins were more or less
unheard of until about 1992.
Yet now they have come and spread like grey
squirrels, usurping that which came before.
Where’s Ukip on turnip lanterns,
that’s what I want to know. Please, guys. It’s what you’re for.
No comments:
Post a Comment